scholarly journals Hepatic Immune-Mediated-Adverse-Effects of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Analysis of Real-Life Experience

2021 ◽  
pp. 100561
Author(s):  
Joana Alves da Silva ◽  
Daniela Falcão ◽  
Cláudia Cardoso ◽  
Ana Luísa Pires ◽  
António Araújo ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. S460-S461
Author(s):  
K. Fuglsang Junker ◽  
G. Persson ◽  
J. Lykkegaard Andersen ◽  
J. Sørensen ◽  
S. Langer ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 221 ◽  
pp. 61-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ke-Tao Jin ◽  
Shi-Bing Wang ◽  
Xiao-Jiang Ying ◽  
Huan-Rong Lan ◽  
Jie-Qing Lv ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 369-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory A Daniels ◽  
Angela D Guerrera ◽  
Donna Katz ◽  
Jayne Viets-Upchurch

Multiple drugs of a new class of cancer treatments called immune checkpoint inhibitors, which work by enabling the immune system to attack tumour cells, have been approved for a variety of indications in recent years. Immune checkpoints, such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 and programmed death-1, are part of the normal immune system and regulate immune activation. Treatment with inhibitors of these checkpoints can significantly improve response rates, progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with cancer; it can also result in adverse reactions that present similarly to other conditions. These immune-mediated adverse reactions (IMARs) are most commonly gastrointestinal, respiratory, endocrine or dermatologic. Although patients’ presentations may appear similar to other types of cancer therapy, the underlying causes, and consequently their management, may differ. Prompt recognition is critical because, with appropriate management, most IMARs resolve and patients can continue receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Rarely, these IMARs may be life-threatening and escape detection from the usual evaluations in the emergency environment. Given the unusual spectrum and mechanism of IMARs arising from immune checkpoint inhibitors, emergency departmentED staff require a clear understanding of the evaluation of IMARs to enable them to appropriately assess and treat these patients. Treatment of IMARs, most often with high-dose steroids, differs from chemotherapy-related adverse events and when possible should be coordinated with the treating oncologist. This review summarises the ED presentation and management of IMARs arising from immune checkpoint inhibitors and includes recommendations for tools and resources for ED healthcare professionals.


2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 11725-11740
Author(s):  
Tian-ming Cui ◽  
Yao Liu ◽  
Jia-bei Wang ◽  
Lian-xin Liu

Immunotherapy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 235-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Reinhorn ◽  
Oded Jacobi ◽  
Oded Icht ◽  
Elizabeth Dudnik ◽  
Ofer Rotem ◽  
...  

Aim: The treatment paradigm of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer has recently changed with the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). It is common practice to continue treatment beyond progression (TBP) in selected cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate real life practice and outcomes related to TBP. Materials & methods: We retrospectively evaluated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with ICI therapy and identified patients who were treated beyond progression. Results: Of 207 patients included in this analysis, 22% patients received TBP. A total of 36% achieved a clinical benefit. A total of 27% patients had a progression-free interval over 6 months after receiving TBP. Conclusion: A subset of patients who were treated beyond progression with ICI achieved a clinically meaningful response with durable disease control.


2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 1219-1227 ◽  
Author(s):  
ONDREJ FIALA ◽  
ONDREJ SOREJS ◽  
JAN SUSTR ◽  
RADEK KUCERA ◽  
ONDREJ TOPOLCAN ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document