A randomized controlled trial to study the effects of breakfast on energy intake, physical activity, and body fat in women who are nonhabitual breakfast eaters

Appetite ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 112 ◽  
pp. 44-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabrielle Marie LeCheminant ◽  
James D. LeCheminant ◽  
Larry A. Tucker ◽  
Bruce W. Bailey
2019 ◽  
Vol 110 (3) ◽  
pp. 583-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corby K Martin ◽  
William D Johnson ◽  
Candice A Myers ◽  
John W Apolzan ◽  
Conrad P Earnest ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Background Exercise is recommended for weight management, yet exercise produces less weight loss than expected, which is called weight compensation. The mechanisms for weight compensation are unclear. Objective The aim of this study was to identify the mechanisms responsible for compensation. Methods In a randomized controlled trial conducted at an academic research center, adults (n = 198) with overweight or obesity were randomized for 24 wk to a no-exercise control group or 1 of 2 supervised exercise groups: 8 kcal/kg of body weight/wk (KKW) or 20 KKW. Outcome assessment occurred at weeks 0 and 24. Energy intake, activity, and resting metabolic rate (RMR) were measured with doubly labeled water (DLW; with and without adjustments for change in RMR), armband accelerometers, and indirect calorimetry, respectively. Appetite and compensatory health beliefs were measured by self-report. Results A per-protocol analysis included 171 participants (72.5% women; mean ± SD baseline body mass index: 31.5 ± 4.7 kg/m2). Significant (P < 0.01) compensation occurred in the 8 KKW (mean: 1.5 kg; 95% CI: 0.9, 2.2 kg) and 20 KKW (mean: 2.7 kg; 95% CI: 2.0, 3.5 kg) groups, and compensation differed significantly between the exercise groups (P = 0.01). Energy intake by adjusted DLW increased significantly (P < 0.05) in the 8 KKW (mean: 90.7 kcal/d; 95% CI: 35.1, 146.4 kcal/d) and 20 KKW (mean: 123.6 kcal/d; 95% CI: 64.5, 182.7 kcal/d) groups compared with control (mean: −2.3 kcal/d; 95% CI: −58.0, 53.5 kcal/d). Results were similar without DLW adjustment. RMR and physical activity (excluding structured exercise) did not differentially change among the 3 groups. Participants with higher compared with lower compensation reported increased appetite ratings and beliefs that healthy behaviors can compensate for unhealthy behaviors. Furthermore, they increased craving for sweet foods, increased sleep disturbance, and had worsening bodily pain. Conclusions Compensation resulted from increased energy intake and concomitant increases in appetite, which can be treated with dietary or pharmacological interventions. Compensation was not due to activity or metabolic changes. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01264406.


2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 126-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer E. Lambert ◽  
Jill A. Parnell ◽  
Jasmine M. Tunnicliffe ◽  
Jay Han ◽  
Troy Sturzenegger ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (598) ◽  
pp. eabd8034
Author(s):  
Iain Templeman ◽  
Harry Alex Smith ◽  
Enhad Chowdhury ◽  
Yung-Chih Chen ◽  
Harriet Carroll ◽  
...  

Intermittent fasting may impart metabolic benefits independent of energy balance by initiating fasting-mediated mechanisms. This randomized controlled trial examined 24-hour fasting with 150% energy intake on alternate days for 3 weeks in lean, healthy individuals (0:150; n = 12). Control groups involved a matched degree of energy restriction applied continuously without fasting (75% energy intake daily; 75:75; n = 12) or a matched pattern of fasting without net energy restriction (200% energy intake on alternate days; 0:200; n = 12). Primary outcomes were body composition, components of energy balance, and postprandial metabolism. Daily energy restriction (75:75) reduced body mass (−1.91 ± 0.99 kilograms) almost entirely due to fat loss (−1.75 ± 0.79 kilograms). Restricting energy intake via fasting (0:150) also decreased body mass (−1.60 ± 1.06 kilograms; P = 0.46 versus 75:75) but with attenuated reductions in body fat (−0.74 ± 1.32 kilograms; P = 0.01 versus 75:75), whereas fasting without energy restriction (0:200) did not significantly reduce either body mass (−0.52 ± 1.09 kilograms; P ≤ 0.04 versus 75:75 and 0:150) or fat mass (−0.12 ± 0.68 kilograms; P ≤ 0.05 versus 75:75 and 0:150). Postprandial indices of cardiometabolic health and gut hormones, along with the expression of key genes in subcutaneous adipose tissue, were not statistically different between groups (P > 0.05). Alternate-day fasting less effectively reduces body fat mass than a matched degree of daily energy restriction and without evidence of fasting-specific effects on metabolic regulation or cardiovascular health.


2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle C. Kegler ◽  
Regine Haardörfer ◽  
Iris C. Alcantara ◽  
Julie A. Gazmararian ◽  
J. K. Veluswamy ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document