scholarly journals Non-invasive brain stimulation to investigate language production in healthy speakers: A meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. 10-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jana Klaus ◽  
Dennis J.L.G. Schutter
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jana Klaus ◽  
Dennis J.L.G. Schutter

Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has become a common method to study the interrelations between the brain and language functioning. This meta-analysis examined the efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the study of language production in healthy volunteers. Forty-five effect sizes from 30 studies which investigated the effects of NIBS on picture naming or verbal fluency in healthy participants were meta-analysed. Further sub-analyses investigated potential influences of stimulation type, control, target site, task, online vs. offline application, and current density of the target electrode. Random effects modelling showed a small, but reliable effect of NIBS on language production. Subsequent analyses indicated larger weighted mean effect sizes for TMS as compared to tDCS studies. No statistical differences for the other sub-analyses were observed. We conclude that NIBS is a useful method for neuroscientific studies on language production in healthy volunteers.


BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. e015669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Terrence O'Brien ◽  
Gabriel Torrealba Acosta ◽  
Rodrigo Huerta ◽  
Aurore Thibaut

Author(s):  
Vinzent Wolf ◽  
Anne Kühnel ◽  
Vanessa Teckentrup ◽  
Julian Koenig ◽  
Nils B. Kroemer

AbstractNon-invasive brain stimulation techniques, such as transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS), have considerable potential for clinical use. Beneficial effects of taVNS have been demonstrated on symptoms in patients with mental or neurological disorders as well as transdiagnostic dimensions, including mood and motivation. However, since taVNS research is still an emerging field, the underlying neurophysiological processes are not yet fully understood, and the replicability of findings on biomarkers of taVNS effects has been questioned. Here, we perform a living Bayesian random effects meta-analysis to synthesize the current evidence concerning the effects of taVNS on heart rate variability (HRV), a candidate biomarker that has, so far, received most attention in the field. To keep the synthesis of evidence transparent and up to date as new studies are being published, we developed a Shiny web app that regularly incorporates new results and enables users to modify study selection criteria to evaluate the robustness of the inference across potential confounds. Our analysis focuses on 17 single-blind studies comparing taVNS versus sham in healthy participants. These newly synthesized results provide strong evidence for the null hypothesis (g = 0.011, CIshortest = [−0.103, 0.125], BF01 = 25.587), indicating that acute taVNS does not alter HRV compared to sham. To conclude, based on a synthesis of the available evidence to date, there is no support for the hypothesis that HRV is a robust biomarker for acute taVNS. By increasing transparency and timeliness, we believe that the concept of living meta-analyses can lead to transformational benefits in emerging fields such as non-invasive brain stimulation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 197 ◽  
pp. 34-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caio Osoegawa ◽  
July Silveira Gomes ◽  
Ruth Bartelli Grigolon ◽  
Elisa Brietzke ◽  
Ary Gadelha ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 82-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Wook Kim ◽  
In-Soo Shin ◽  
Hyun Im Moon ◽  
Sang Chul Lee ◽  
Seo Yeon Yoon

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document