scholarly journals Development of event-specific qPCR detection methods for genetically modified alfalfa events J101, J163 and KK179

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 100076 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Guertler ◽  
Lutz Grohmann ◽  
Heike Naumann ◽  
Melanie Pavlovic ◽  
Ulrich Busch
2010 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-147
Author(s):  
Kazumi Kitta

The Japanese government introduced a labeling system for genetically modified (GM) foods. To ensure the authenticity of the labeling system, we have developed and validated detection methods for newly approved GM events. One was the development of quantitative analytical methods utilizing plasmid DNAs as calibrators, which enabled us to obtain an unlimited supply of calibrators of consistent quality and also to obtain a stable standard curve to quantify GM organisms (GMOs) in samples. The significance of quality control has been recognized among relevant stakeholders, and in response we launched a project to distribute certified reference materials (CRMs) to the users of our methods for the purpose of internal quality control. In addition to these activities, we have developed time- and cost-effective detection methods, such as a new screening method to simultaneously detect the sequence of Cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter (p35S) and the construct-specific sequence of GA21 event utilizing multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We also developed a qualitative nonaplex PCR detection method, which allows the simultaneous detection of eight events of GM maize lines. Because the influx of any unapproved and unknown GMOs into the Japanese market is not permitted, we continue to explore this issue.


Foods ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Deckers ◽  
Dieter Deforce ◽  
Marie-Alice Fraiture ◽  
Nancy H.C. Roosens

The use of food enzymes (FE) by the industrial food industry is continuously increasing. These FE are mainly obtained by microbial fermentation, for which both wild-type (WT) and genetically modified (GM) strains are used. The FE production yield can be increased by optimizing the fermentation process, either by using genetically modified micro-organism (GMM) strains or by producing recombinant enzymes. This review provides a general overview of the different methods used to produce FE preparations and how the use of GMM can increase the production yield. Additionally, information regarding the construction of these GMM strains is provided. Thereafter, an overview of the different European regulations concerning the authorization of FE preparations on the European market and the use of GMM strains is given. Potential issues related to the authorization and control of FE preparations sold on the European market are then identified and illustrated by a case study. This process highlighted the importance for control of FE preparations and the consequent need for appropriate detection methods targeting the presence of GMM, which is used in fermentation products.


2002 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 787-791 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gert van Duijn ◽  
Ria van Biert ◽  
Henriette Bleeker-Marcelis ◽  
Ineke van Boeijen ◽  
Abdi Jama Adan ◽  
...  

Abstract According to European Commission (EC) Regulation 1139/98, foods and food ingredients that are to be delivered to the final consumer in which either protein or DNA resulting from genetic modification is present, shall be subject to additional specific labeling requirements. Since 1994, genetically altered tomatoes, squash, potatoes, canola, cotton, and soy have been on the market. Recently, insect-resistant and herbicide-tolerant maize varieties have been introduced. Soy and maize are 2 of the most important vegetable crops in the world. During the past 4 years, both protein- and DNA-based methods have been developed and applied for detection of transgenic soy and maize, and their derivatives. For protein-based detection, specific monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies have been developed; for immunochemical detection, Western blot analysis and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays are the most prominent examples. For detection of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) at the level of DNA, polymerase chain reaction-based methods are mainly used. For these reactions, highly specific primer sets are needed. This study compares the principally different methods. Specificity of methods and the possible risks of false-positive or false-negative results are considered in relation to sampling, matrix effects, and food processing procedures. In addition, quantitative aspects of protein- and DNA-based GM detection methods are presented and discussed. This is especially relevant as EC regulation 49/2000, which defines a threshold for an unintentional comingling of 1%, came into force on April 10, 2000.


2020 ◽  
Vol 145 ◽  
pp. 01013
Author(s):  
Zhao Yu-jia ◽  
Fan Pei-lei ◽  
Liang Liang ◽  
Liu Yin-yin ◽  
Zhao Hai-bo ◽  
...  

Genetically modified crops (GMCs) have been known for the excellent qualities. The commercializing of GMCs has taken great economic and social benefits. However, the bio-security of GMCs was still an issue. To solve this problem, countries around the world were constantly strengthening regulations on planting, processing and detecting of GMCs. This paper reviewed the development of commercialization and detection of GMCs. The difference between protein and nucleic acid detection methods of genetically modified crop was further discussed. This paper will provide new insights for the application of genetically modified crops.


2016 ◽  
Vol 194 ◽  
pp. 20-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaojun Wei ◽  
Huangying Le ◽  
Aihu Pan ◽  
Junfeng Xu ◽  
Feiwu Li ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 97 (5) ◽  
pp. 1299-1309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rashmi Chhabra ◽  
Gurinder Jit Randhawa ◽  
Rajesh K Bhoge ◽  
Monika Singh

Abstract Qualitative diagnostics for all five commercialized genetically modified (GM) cotton events for insect resistance in India is being reported for the first time in this paper. The cost-effective and robust multiplex PCR (MPCR)-based detection assay, distinguishing the insect resistant transgenic Bt cotton events, viz., MON531, MON15985, Event 1, GFM-cry1A, and MLS-9124, has been developed. This decaplex PCR assay targets nine transgenic elements, viz., sequences of four transgenes, three transgene constructs, and two event-specific sequences along with one endogenous reference gene. The LOD of the qualitative MPCR assay was up to 0.1%. A quantitative detection method for four widely commercially cultivated GM cotton events, namely, MON531, MON15985, Event 1, and GFM-cry1A, covering 99.5% of the total area under GM cultivation in the country, is also reported. A construct-specific real-time PCR assay has been developed for quantification of these GM cotton events with LOQ <0.05% and LOD <0.025%. The developed assays will be of great use to screen for the presence/absence of authorized GM cotton events in unknown samples and to check the authenticity of GM cotton seed samples.


Food Control ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 375-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gert van Duijn ◽  
Ria van Biert ◽  
Henriëtte Bleeker-Marcelis ◽  
Heleen Peppelman ◽  
Martin Hessing

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document