Wear Resistance of Bulk-Fill Dental Resins Cured by Different Light-Curing Settings

Biotribology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 100197
Author(s):  
Elisa Gaoyang Li ◽  
John Neil Waddell ◽  
Joanne Jung Eun Choi
Polymers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 470
Author(s):  
Andrea Kowalska ◽  
Jerzy Sokolowski ◽  
Kinga Bociong

The presented paper concerns current knowledge of commercial and alternative photoinitiator systems used in dentistry. It discusses alternative and commercial photoinitiators and focuses on mechanisms of polymerization process, in vitro measurement methods and factors influencing the degree of conversion and hardness of dental resins. PubMed, Academia.edu, Google Scholar, Elsevier, ResearchGate and Mendeley, analysis from 1985 to 2020 were searched electronically with appropriate keywords. Over 60 articles were chosen based on relevance to this review. Dental light-cured composites are the most common filling used in dentistry, but every photoinitiator system requires proper light-curing system with suitable spectrum of light. Alternation of photoinitiator might cause changing the values of biomechanical properties such as: degree of conversion, hardness, biocompatibility. This review contains comparison of biomechanical properties of dental composites including different photosensitizers among other: camphorquinone, phenanthrenequinone, benzophenone and 1-phenyl-1,2 propanedione, trimethylbenzoyl-diphenylphosphine oxide, benzoyl peroxide. The major aim of this article was to point out alternative photoinitiators which would compensate the disadvantages of camphorquinone such as: yellow staining or poor biocompatibility and also would have mechanical properties as satisfactory as camphorquinone. Research showed there is not an adequate photoinitiator which can be as sufficient as camphorquinone (CQ), but alternative photosensitizers like: benzoyl germanium or novel acylphosphine oxide photoinitiators used synergistically with CQ are able to improve aesthetic properties and degree of conversion of dental resin.


2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Cláudia Lapria Faria ◽  
Ubiratan Menezes Benassi ◽  
Renata Cristina Silveira Rodrigues ◽  
Ricardo Faria Ribeiro ◽  
Maria da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos

This study evaluated the surface hardness and wear resistance of indirect composites (Artglass and Solidex) and the existence of a correlation between these properties. Twenty-four specimens (12 per material) were fabricated using a polytetrafluoroethylene matrix (5.0 mm in diameter; 7.0 mm high) following an incremental technique. Polymerization was done with a xenon stroboscopic light curing unit. After polishing, the specimens were stored in water at 37°C during either 1 day (n=6 per material) or 55 days (n=6 per material), after which Vickers surface hardness and wear resistance were assessed. Data were analyzed statistically by unpaired Student t-test, two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. Surface hardness. Artglass had higher surface hardness than Solidex after 1-day immersion period (p<0.01), but after 55 days there was no significant difference between the materials (p>0.05). Comparing the materials at both periods, Artglass means differed significantly to each other (p<0.01), while no significant difference was found between Solidex means (p>0.05). Wear resistance. Solidex had higher wear than Artglass after 1-day immersion period (p<0.01), but no significant difference was found between the materials after 55 days (p>0.05). Comparing the materials at both periods, Artglass means differed significantly to each other (p<0.01), with higher wear at 55-day period, but no difference was found between Solidex means (p>0.05). These results suggest that Artglass was better than Solidex in terms of hardness and wear resistance after 1-day water immersion. However, it was more susceptible to degradation, showing greater wear after 55 days. In conclusion, there was an inverse correlation between surface hardness and wear resistance for both Artglass and Solidex indirect composites, that is the higher the hardness, the lower the wear.


2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Haenel ◽  
Berenika Hausnerová ◽  
Johannes Steinhaus ◽  
Richard B.T. Price ◽  
Braden Sullivan ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-43
Author(s):  
Fahad Alkhudhairy

ABSTRACT Introduction The aim of this study was to assess the wear resistance of four bulk-fill composite resin restorative materials cured using high- and low-intensity lights. Materials and methods Twenty-four samples were prepared from each composite resin material (Tetric N-Ceram, SonicFill, Smart Dentin Replacement, Filtek Bulk-Fill) resulting in a total of 96 samples; they were placed into a mold in a single increment. All of the 96 samples were cured using the Bluephase N light curing unit for 20 seconds. Half of the total specimens (n = 48) were light cured using high-intensity output (1,200 mW/cm2), while the remaining half (n = 48) were light cured using low-intensity output (650 mW/cm2). Wear was analyzed by a three-dimensional (3D) noncontact optical profilometer (Contour GT-I, Bruker, Germany). Mean and standard deviation (SD) of surface loss (depth) after 120,000 cycles for each test material was calculated and analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a significance level at p < 0.05. Results The least mean surface loss was observed for SonicFill (186.52 µm) cured using low-intensity light. No significant difference in the mean surface loss was observed when comparing the four tested materials with each other without taking the curing light intensity into consideration (p = 0.352). A significant difference in the mean surface loss was observed between SonicFill cured using high-intensity light compared with that cured using low-intensity light (p < 0.001). Conclusion A higher curing light intensity (1,200 mW/cm2) had no positive influence on the wear resistance of the four bulk-fill composite resin restorative materials tested compared with lower curing light intensity (650 mW/cm2). Furthermore, SonicFill cured using low-intensity light was the most wearresistant material tested, whereas Tetric N-Ceram cured using high-intensity light was the least wear resistant. Clinical significance The wear resistance was better with the newly introduced bulk-fill composite resins under low-intensity light curing. How to cite this article Alkhudhairy F. Wear Resistance of Bulk-fill Composite Resin Restorative Materials Polymerized under different Curing Intensities. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017;18(1):39-43.


2001 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 381-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.H. Lloyd ◽  
S.N. Scrimgeour ◽  
D.M. Lane ◽  
G. Hunter ◽  
P.J. McDonald

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 279-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Kameyama ◽  
Hitoshi Hatayama ◽  
Junji Kato ◽  
Akiko Haruyama ◽  
Hiromi Teraoka ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luiz Henrique Soares Torres ◽  
Luiza Monzoli Covre ◽  
Caio Pimenteira Uchôa ◽  
Déborah Laurindo Pereira Santos ◽  
Renato Torres Augusto Neto ◽  
...  

As resinas compostas fotopolimerizáveis têm tido cada vez mais indicações na odontologia restauradora devido às vantagens que apresentam. Porém variações na técnica de fotoativação, densidade de energia, intensidade da luz e tempo de irradiação podem gerar polimerização incompleta, o que pode resultar em uma resina composta com alta porosidade, pouca dureza, baixo polimento, alta capacidade de pigmentação ou efeitos tóxicos na polpa. Este estudo tem por objetivo analisar o efeito do tempo de polimerização na pigmentação extrínseca de três resinas compostas fotopolimerizáveis. Utilizando uma fonte de LED, foram confeccionados 180 espécimes de resina composta microhíbrida, nanohíbrida e nanoparticulada, com diferentes protocolos de polimerização. Os espécimes foram subdivididos em grupos de acordo com o agente pigmentante. Com o uso de um colorímetro, foram analisados quanto à mudança de cor (ΔE). Os dados foram submetidos ao teste ANOVA e Duncan (α=0,05). A resina composta microhíbrida apresentou os menores valores de ΔE em comparação à nanoparticulada e à nanohíbrida quando imersos em vinho. Quanto maior o tempo de polimerização menores valores de ΔE foram obtidos. Não somente o tempo de polimerização influencia no grau de pigmentação, mas também fatores intrínsecos às resinas compostas tais como carga, agente fotoiniciador e matriz orgânica.Descritores: Autocura de Resinas Dentárias; Materiais Dentários; Pigmentação.ReferênciasMatson MR, Matson AMFP. Avaliação do grau de conversão de resinas compostas quando ativadas por luz halógena: método convencional, alta potência e método “soft”. Rev Inst Ciênc Saúde. 2006;24(4):307-11.Delaviz Y, Finer Y, Santerre JP. Biodegradation of resin composites and adhesivesby oral bacteria and saliva: A rationale for new material designs that consider the clinical environment and treatment challenges. Dent Mater. 2014;30(1):16-32.Nahsan FPS, Ueda JK, Silva JO, Schimitt VL, Naufel FS, Formighieri LA et al. Estabilidade de cor de resina composta após imersão em café, água e solução de clorexidina. Rev Bras Pesq Saúde. 2009;11(2):13-7.Al  Kheraif  AA,  Qasim  SS,  Ramakrishnaiah  R,  Rehman  I.  Effect  of different beverages on the color stability and degree of conversion of nano and microhybrid composites. Dent Mater J. 2013;(32)2:326-31.Ceballos L, Fuentes MV, Tafalla H, Martínez A, Flores J, Rodríguez J. Curing effectiveness of resin composites at different exposure times using LED and halogen units. Med Oral Pathol Oral Cir Bucal 2009;14(1):e51-6.Rahiotis C, Patsouri K, Silikas N, Kakaboura A. Curing efficiency of high- intensity light-emitting diode (LED) devices. J Oral Sci.  2010; 52(2):187-95.Sgarbi SC, Pereira SK, Martins JMH, Oliveira MAC, Mazur RF. Degree of conversion of resin composites light activated by halogen light and led analyzed by ultraviolet spectrometry. Rev Clín Pesq Odontol. 2010;6(3):223-30.Caldarelli PG, Beltrani FC, Santos FA, Shibayama R, Hoepper  MG. Manchamento de uma resina composta e sua Relação com o efeito da intensidade da luz Emitida por aparelhos fotopolimerizadores de Lâmpada halôgena. Rev Fac Odontol Aracatuba. 2011;(32)2:44-8.Valentini F, Oliveira SGD, Guimarães GZ, Barbosa RPS, Moraes RR. Effect of surface sealant on the color stability of composite resin restorations. Braz Dent J. 2011;22(5):365-68.Freitas ABDA, Gomes HR, Guimarães FBR, Marinho VA, Barros LM. Influência do tipo de aparelho fotopolimerizador na absorção de água por restaurações de resina composta. Rev Inst Ciênc Saúde.  2008;(26)1:65-9.Porto ICCM, Soares LES, Martin AA, Cavalli V, Liporoni PCS. Influence of the photoinitiator system and light photoactivation units on the degree of conversion  of  dental  composites. Braz Oral Res. 2010;24(4):475-81.Pequeno JHP, Araújo GS, Neri JR, Bomfim AGM, Mendonça JS, Santiago SL. Efeito dos protocolos de fotoativação na dureza de uma resina composta nanoparticulada. ROBRAC. 2012;21(56):394-97.Uhl A, Mills RW, Rzanny AE, Jandt KD. Time dependence of composite shrinkage using halogen and LED light curing. Dent Mater. 2005;21(3):278-86.Eick JD, Kotha SP, Chappelow CC, Kilway KV, Giese GJ, Glaros AG et al. Properties of  silorane-based  dental resins and composites containing    a    stressreducing  monomer. Dent Mater. 2007;23(8):1011-17.Neumann MG, Schmitt CC, Ferreira GC, Correa IC. The initiating radical yields and the efficiency of polymerization for various dental photoinitiators excited by different lightcuring units. Dent Mater. 2006;22(6):576-84.Asmussen   E,  Peutzfeldt   A.   Influence   of   composition   on   rate   of polymerization contraction of light-curing resin composites. Acta Odontol Scand. 2002;60(3):146-50.Silva EH, Albuquerque RC, Lanza LD, Vieira GC, Peixoto RT, Alvim HH et al. Influence of different light sources on the conversion of composite resins. Indian J Dent Res. 2011;22(6):790-94.Souza E, Espíndola M, Diegoli NM, Kuroshima KN. Avaliação da alteração de cor de diferentes compósitos restauradores - influência de corantes usados na cavidade oral - estudo in vitro. RGO. 2006;54(1):43-6.Salvego RN, Dias RPB. Figueiredo JLG. Estabilidade de cor de resinas compostas no processo de manchamento e clareamento, Rev Dental Press Estét. 2013;10(3):54-62.Firoozmandi LM, Balducci I, Araújo MAM.  Influência da Fotopolimerização e da Cor da Resina Composta na Microdureza. Pesq Bras Odontoped Clín Integr. 2009;9(1):37-42.Anfe TEA, Agra CM, Vieira GF. Comparação de duas técnicas de fotoativação na sorção e solubilidade de resinas compostas em solução de etanol. J Biodent Biomater. 2011;1(1):61-7.Villalta P, Lu H, Okte Z, Garcia-Godoy F, Powers JM. Effects of staining and bleaching on color change of dental composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;95(2):137-42.Barghi N, Berry T, Hatton C. Evaluation intensity output of curing lights in private dental offices. J. am. dent. assoc. 1994;125(7):992-96.Santini A, Miletic V, Swift MD, Bradley M. Degree of conversion and microhardness of TPO-containing resin-based composites cured by polywave and monowave LED units. J Dent. 2012;40(7):577-84.


2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 488-495
Author(s):  
Umar S Yushau ◽  
Lama Almofeez ◽  
Ayhan Bozkurt

This article is focused on the preparation and characterization of functional nanosilica incorporated dental resins with better mechanical, cytotoxicity, sorption, and solubility properties. Silica nanoparticles were synthesized via Stöber method and were functionalized with 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole. Dental nanocomposites were produced by embedding the functionalized nanosilica into bisphenol-A-glycidyl methacrylate/triethylene glycol dimethacrylate matrix to form B1–B6 series. This was achieved by mechanical mixing of the monomer (50:50 wt%), filler (10–60 wt%), initiator combination (CQ/EDMAB:0.1:0.4 wt%) and then followed by LED light curing (wavelength: 450–500 nm, power density:1000 mW cm−2) for 60 s. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and thermogravimetric analysis techniques were used for characterization of the materials. Cytotoxicity tests were performed to evaluate cell viability and mechanical tests were done to check mechanical strength and stability of the materials. The mean sorption and solubility values of the materials were measured by making a series of experiments on different composite formulations.


2009 ◽  
Vol 88 (5) ◽  
pp. 439-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Wendl ◽  
P. Muchitsch ◽  
M. Pichelmayer ◽  
H. Droschl ◽  
E. Lankmayr ◽  
...  

Self-etching primers have simplified the process of direct bonding of dental resins, by eliminating the rinsing step after etching in conventional bonding, for example. Although it is generally assumed that all of the applied self-etching primer is incorporated into the resin, the possibility that a substantial amount remains free and extractable into a person’s saliva has not been investigated. The aim of the present study was to examine this issue by bonding brackets to extracted teeth with self-etching primers under controlled conditions and determining the proportion of the applied phosphoric acid ester that is subsequently extractable by high-performance liquid chromatography. Approximately half of the applied acid ester was extractable and thus not integrated into the polymeric network following standard light curing. This was reduced to 40% when the curing time was doubled. Acid ester leaching was a rapid process that was essentially completed within an hour.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document