Women and corporate boards of directors: The promise of increased, and substantive, participation in the post Sarbanes-Oxley era

2010 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan R. Dalton ◽  
Catherine M. Dalton
2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 343-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
April Klein

One of the primary aims of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the New York Stock Exchange, and the NASDAQ corporate governance proposals is to improve the reporting systems for publicly traded companies. Many of the exchange proposals redefine the composition and duties of firms' boards of directors and their compensation and nominating committees. Sarbanes-Oxley places new duties on audit committees and provides oversight and restraints on public accounting companies. This paper describes many of the exchange proposals and puts them in their historical context. I also present the likely effects of the new corporate governance proposals on future boards of directors and assess their impact on the financial reporting system.


Author(s):  
Dan Marlin ◽  
Scott W. Geiger

<p class="MsoNormalCxSpFirst" style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt; mso-pagination: none; mso-add-space: auto;"><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt; mso-themecolor: text1;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">The purpose of this study is to examine corporate board characteristics pre- and post-Sarbanes-Oxley.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp;&nbsp; </span>More specifically, using a sample 1141 US publicly traded firms, board characteristics were identified and then changes in these characteristics were examined across the years 2001, 2004, and 2007.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>Our analyses reveal significant changes in 8 of 10 board characteristics examined.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>Implications and areas for future research are discussed.</span></span></p>


2018 ◽  
pp. 142-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. A. Garanina ◽  
A. A. Muravyev

This article studies the gender composition of corporate boards of Russian companies, including its relation to company performance. The analysis is based on a unique longitudinal dataset of virtually all Russian companies whose shares were traded on the stock market in 1998-2014. It shows a relatively small representation of women, just 12% of all the seats, while about 40% of the companies did not have any female director. At the same time, both the share of companies that appoint female directors and the share of female directors on boards show a clear upward trend. The econometric analysis suggests a positive link between the presence of female directors on boards and company performance, especially when firms appoint several, rather than one, female directors.


Author(s):  
Sabrina Bruno

Climate change is a financial factor that carries with it risks and opportunities for companies. To support boards of directors of companies belonging to all jurisdictions, the World Economic Forum issued in January 2019 eight Principlescontaining both theoretical and practical provisions on: climate accountability, competence, governance, management, disclosure and dialogue. The paper analyses each Principle to understand scope and managerial consequences for boards and to evaluate whether the legal distinctions, among the various jurisdictions, may undermine the application of the Principles or, by contrast, despite the differences the Principles may be a useful and effective guidance to drive boards' of directors' conduct around the world in handling climate change challenges. Five jurisdictions are taken into consideration for this comparative analysis: Europe (and UK), US, Australia, South Africa and Canada. The conclusion is that the WEF Principles, as soft law, is the best possible instrument to address boards of directors of worldwide companies, harmonise their conduct and effectively help facing such global emergency.


Author(s):  
Halil Kaya ◽  
Gaurango Banerjee

The paper examines the Sarbanes-Oxley (2002) Acts immediate impact on board composition and characteristics as well as possible reversals in its impact over time. Effects on directors age and tenure are analyzed over the 2001-06 sample period. Female participation in corporate boards is also studied in the pre-SOX and post-SOX periods. The dual roles of directors in being a member of the board as well as serving as either CEO, CFO, Chairman, Co-Chair, Founder, or Lead Director of their respective companies is also examined. We observe a short-term impact of SOX on board compositions due to changes seen in board characteristics between 2001 (pre-SOX), and 2003-05 short-term period (post-SOX). Also, we observe a reversal of board characteristics in 2006 to pre-SOX levels implying that the effects of SOX on board composition were short-lived, and needs to be monitored over time to ensure adherence to corporate accountability guidelines over the long-term.


2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 1867-1894 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret M. Cullen ◽  
Niamh M. Brennan

Purpose Boards of directors are assumed to exercise three key accountability roles – control, monitoring and oversight roles. By researching one board type – investment fund boards – and the power relations around those boards, the purpose of this paper is to show that such boards are not capable of operating the three key roles assumed of them. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted 25 in-depth interviews and a focus group session with investment fund directors applying a grounded theory methodology. Findings Because of their unique position of power, the authors find that fund promoter organisations (that establish and attract investors to the funds) exercise control and monitoring roles. As a result, contrary to prior assumptions, oversight is the primary role of investment fund boards, rather than the control role or monitoring role associated with corporate boards. The findings can be extended to other board-of-director contexts in which boards (e.g. subsidiary boards, boards of state-owned entities) have legal responsibility but limited power because of power exercised by other parties such as large shareholders. Practical implications Shareholders and regulators generally assume boards exercise control and monitoring roles. This can lead to an expectations gap on the part of shareholders and regulators who may not consider the practical realities in which boards operate. This expectations gap compromises the very objective of governance – investor protection. Originality/value Based on interviews with investment fund directors, the authors challenge the control-role theory of investment fund boards of directors. Building on our findings, and following subsequent conceptual engagement with the literature, the authors differentiate control, monitoring and oversight roles, terms which are often used interchangeably in prior research. The authors distinguish between the three terms on the basis of the level of influence implied by each.


2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Marlin ◽  
Scott W. Geiger

<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span><p style="margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt; text-align: justify; mso-pagination: none; mso-add-space: auto;" class="MsoNormalCxSpFirst"><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">The purpose of this study is to identify and examine differences in corporate board characteristics across four industries.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Using a sample of 2592 US publicly traded firms, eleven board characteristics were identified and then examined across manufacturing, retail trade, finance/insurance, and services industries.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Our analyses revealed significant differences in each of the eleven board characteristics examined.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Implications and areas for future research are discussed.</span></span></p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document