RAD18 promotes the migration and invasion of esophageal squamous cell cancer via the JNK-MMPs pathway

2018 ◽  
Vol 417 ◽  
pp. 65-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shitao Zou ◽  
Jianlong Yang ◽  
Jiaming Guo ◽  
Ye Su ◽  
Chao He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Squamous Cell Cancer ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer ◽  
Migration And Invasion

Genome-wide copy number variation analysis identified ANO1 as a novel oncogene and prognostic biomarker in esophageal squamous cell cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 1198-1208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yue Yu ◽  
Jing Cao ◽  
Weibing Wu ◽  
Quan Zhu ◽  
Yu Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
Transforming Growth Factor ◽  
Squamous Cell Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Biomarker ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Copy Number Variations ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer ◽  
Migration And Invasion

Abstract Copy number variations (CNVs) represent one of the most common genomic alterations. This study aimed to evaluate the roles of genes within highly aberrant genome regions in the prognosis of esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). Exome sequencing data from 81 paired ESCC tissues were used to screen aberrant genomic regions. The associations between CNVs and gene expression were evaluated using gene expression data from the same individuals. Then, an RNA expression array profile from 119 ESCC samples was adopted for differential gene expression and prognostic analyses. Two independent ESCC cohorts with 315 subjects were further recruited to validate the prognostic value using immunohistochemistry tests. Finally, we explored the potential mechanism of our identified novel oncogene in ESCC. In total, 2003 genes with CNVs were observed, of which 76 genes showed recurrent CNVs in more than three samples. Among them, 32 genes were aberrantly expressed in ESCC tumor tissues and statistically correlated with CNVs. Strikingly, 4 (CTTN, SHANK2, INPPL1 and ANO1) of the 32 genes were significantly associated with the prognosis of ESCC patients. Patients with a positive expression of ANO1 had a poorer prognosis than ANO1 negative patients (overall survival rate: 42.91% versus 26.22% for ANO1−/+ samples, P < 0.001). Functionally, ANO1 promoted ESCC cell proliferation, migration and invasion by activating transforming growth factor-β pathway. Knockdown of ANO1 significantly inhibited tumor progression in vitro and in vivo. In conclusion, ANO1 is a novel oncogene in ESCC and may serve as a prognostic biomarker for ESCC.

Topical oro-dispersible budesonide tablets for stricture prevention after near circumferential ESD for esophageal squamous cell cancer – a case report

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Mathies ◽  
Tsuneo Oyama ◽  
Ingo Steinbrück ◽  
Franz Ludwig Dumoulin
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Endoscopic Resection ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Squamous Cell Cancer ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Complete Healing ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer ◽  
Stricture Formation ◽  
Local Injections

Abstract Background Endoscopic resection is the treatment of choice for early esophageal cancers. However, resections comprising more than 70–80 % of the circumference are associated with a high risk of stricture formation. Currently, repetitive local injections and/or systemic steroids are given for prevention. Case report We present here the case of a 78-year-old male patient who had a near circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection for a pT1a mm, L0, V0, R0, G2 esophageal squamous cell cancer. At the end of endoscopic resection, 80 mg of triamcinolone was injected locally. The patient was then treated with oro-dispersible budesonide tablets (2 × 1 mg/day) and nystatin (4 × 100 000 I.E.) for 8 weeks. This treatment resulted in complete healing without any stricture formation and did not result in any complications. Discussion Treatment with orodispersible budesonide tablets could help prevent strictures after large endoscopic resections in the esophagus.

scholarly journals Low cardiac dose and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predict overall survival in inoperable esophageal squamous cell cancer patients after chemoradiotherapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Chieh Ho ◽  
Yuan-Chun Lai ◽  
Hsuan-Yu Lin ◽  
Ming-Hui Ko ◽  
Sheng-Hung Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Squamous Cell Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Cardiac Dose

AbstractWe aimed to determine the prognostic significance of cardiac dose and hematological immunity parameters in esophageal cancer patients after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). During 2010–2015, we identified 101 newly diagnosed esophageal squamous cell cancer patients who had completed definitive CCRT. Patients' clinical, dosimetric, and hematological data, including absolute neutrophil count, absolute lymphocyte count, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), at baseline, during, and post-CCRT were analyzed. Cox proportional hazards were calculated to identify potential risk factors for overall survival (OS). Median OS was 13 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.38–15.63). Univariate analysis revealed that male sex, poor performance status, advanced nodal stage, higher percentage of heart receiving 10 Gy (heart V10), and higher NLR (baseline and follow-up) were significantly associated with worse OS. In multivariate analysis, performance status (ECOG 0 & 1 vs. 2; hazard ratio [HR] 3.12, 95% CI 1.30–7.48), heart V10 (> 84% vs. ≤ 84%; HR 2.24, 95% CI 1.26–3.95), baseline NLR (> 3.56 vs. ≤ 3.56; HR 2.36, 95% CI 1.39–4.00), and follow-up NLR (> 7.4 vs. ≤ 7.4; HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.12–3.41) correlated with worse OS. Volume of low cardiac dose and NLR (baseline and follow-up) were associated with worse patient survival.

Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer Chemoprevention Trial of Selenomethionine and Celecoxib

2005 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 863-873 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul J. Limburg ◽  
Wenqiang Wei ◽  
Dennis J. Ahnen ◽  
Youlin Qiao ◽  
Ernest T. Hawk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Squamous Cell Cancer ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Cancer Chemoprevention ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer ◽  
Chemoprevention Trial
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document