Radiotherapy of anal canal cancer

Author(s):  
D. Peiffert ◽  
F. Huguet ◽  
V. Vendrely ◽  
L. Moureau-Zabotto ◽  
E. Rivin Del Campo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (29) ◽  
pp. 4581-4586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph K. Salama ◽  
Loren K. Mell ◽  
David A. Schomas ◽  
Robert C. Miller ◽  
Kiran Devisetty ◽  
...  

PurposeTo report a multicenter experience treating anal canal cancer patients with concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).Patients and MethodsFrom October 2000 to June 2006, 53 patients were treated with concurrent chemotherapy and IMRT for anal squamous cell carcinoma at three tertiary-care academic medical centers. Sixty-two percent were T1-2, and 67% were N0; eight patients were HIV positive. Forty-eight patients received fluorouracil (FU)/mitomycin, one received FU/cisplatin, and four received FU alone. All patients underwent computed tomography–based treatment planning with pelvic regions and inguinal nodes receiving a median of 45 Gy. Primary sites and involved nodes were boosted to a median dose of 51.5 Gy. All acute toxicity was scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. All late toxicity was scored using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria.ResultsMedian follow-up was 14.5 months (range, 5.2 to 102.8 months). Acute grade 3+ toxicity included 15.1% GI and 37.7% dermatologic toxicity; all acute grade 4 toxicities were hematologic; and acute grade 4 leukopenia and neutropenia occurred in 30.2% and 34.0% of patients, respectively. Treatment breaks occurred in 41.5% of patients, lasting a median of 4 days. Forty-nine patients (92.5%) had a complete response, one patient had a partial response, and three had stable disease. All HIV-positive patients achieved a complete response. Eighteen-month colostomy-free survival, overall survival, freedom from local failure, and freedom from distant failure were 83.7%, 93.4%, 83.9%, and 92.9%, respectively.ConclusionPreliminary outcomes suggest that concurrent chemotherapy and IMRT for anal canal cancers is effective and tolerated favorably compared with historical standards.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. e137-e139
Author(s):  
Francesca De Felice ◽  
Daniela Musio ◽  
Vincenzo Tombolini

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Losada B ◽  
Pulido G ◽  
Cervera R ◽  
Ibeas P ◽  
Perezagua C

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
David T. Marshall ◽  
Charles R. Thomas Jr

There are around 5,000 new cases of anal canal cancer each year in the United States. It is of particular risk in HIV-positive populations. Many cases are related to persistent infection with human papillomavirus (HPV). The treatment of anal cancer has progressed from abdominoperineal resection mandating permanent colostomy in the 1940s through the 1970s to modern chemoradiation with sphincter preservation in around 80% of patients, even with locally advanced disease. The evolution of the treatment paradigm of this disease is a model for the treatment of malignant disease with organ preservation. Multiple randomized trials have been conducted to guide this evolution. Technological developments in the delivery of radiotherapy and anti-cancer pharmaceuticals harbor hope for further improvements in outcomes with possible reductions in toxicity and increases in tumor control. Perhaps most inspiring is the recent development of HPV vaccines that


1989 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 2414-2420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken HAYASHI ◽  
Teruyuki HIROTA ◽  
Masayuki ITABASHI ◽  
Keiichi HOJO ◽  
Yoshihiro MORIYA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 876-883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanouil P. Pappou ◽  
Jonathan T. Magruder ◽  
Tao Fu ◽  
Caitlin W. Hicks ◽  
Joseph M. Herman ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Bradford A. Perez ◽  
Christopher G. Willett ◽  
Brian G. Czito ◽  
Manisha Palta
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document