Atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure: what is the impact of long-term anticoagulation on outcomes

Between 1968 and 1995, a total of 153 patients who were between 35 and 63 years of age (mean 49.8 years), underwent surgery for secundum type atrial septal defect. There were 78 (50.9%) males and 75 females (49.1 %). Mean left-to-right shunt ratio was calculated as 2.49. Mean pulmonary artery pressure was 50.15 mm Hg. Three patients died within 30 days of surgery, giving a hospital mortality of 1.96%. Long-term follow-up was available in 135 cases (90%). Total follow-up was 967.3 patient-years and ranged from 3 months to 11.3 years (mean 7.16 years). There were no late deaths reported. Four patients were readmitted with atrial fibrillation and 2 with pericardial effusion. In our experience, surgical closure of atrial septal defect in adults was found to be successful, safe, and with low morbidity in patients with pulmonary hypertension and congestive heart failure.

Download Full-text

P985The long-term impact of maintaining sinus rhythm on the risk for death or heart failure after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in a real world clinical practice

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0578 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

T Yoshizawa ◽

H Shiomi ◽

M Tanaka ◽

T Aizawa ◽

S Yamagami ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Heart Failure ◽

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Catheter Ablation ◽

P Value ◽

Af Ablation ◽

Risk Of Death ◽

The Impact ◽

Af Recurrence

Abstract Background Catheter ablation has been rapidly spread as a first line therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF). A recent randomized trial have shown that AF ablation reduces the risk of death or hospitalization for heart failure (HF). However, the impact of maintained sinus rhythm (SR) on long-term risk of death or HF hospitalization has not been adequately evaluated. Purpose To investigate the impact of maintaining SR by AF ablation on long-term risk of all-cause death or HF hospitalization. Methods The long-term clinical outcomes were compared between patients with maintained SR and those with recurrent AF using a landmark analysis in which the landmark point was set at 1.5-year after the 1st ablation. Results Among consecutive 1467 patients who underwent AF ablation in our institution between February 2004 and December 2017, the study population consisted of 1311 patients after excluding 150 patients because of death or lost to follow-up. Mean age was 67.9±0.3 and paroxysmal AF was 67%. Among 460 patients who had AF recurrence within 1.5 years after the 1st ablation, 328 underwent 2nd ablation. Therefore, at 1.5-year after the 1st AF ablation, 1145 patients had maintained SR rhythm (SR-group), and 166 patients had recurrent AF episodes (AF-group). During 4.7±2.4 years of follow-up, the cumulative 5-year incidence of death or HF beyond 1.5 years after the 1st ablation was 5.1% in SR-group and 15.6% in AF-group (log rank P<0.001). After adjusting for baseline confounders, the lower risk of SR-group relative to AF-group for death or HF was still statistically significant (HR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.11–3.58, P=0.02). Risks for a Composite of Death or HF Hazard Ratio (95% CI) Crude HR P value Adjusted HR P value AF recurrence 2.59 (1.43–4.43) 0.002 2.05 (1.11–3.58) 0.02 Age>75 years old 2.55 (1.56–4.10) <0.001 2.32 (1.39–3.81) 0.002 Female 0.85 (0.49–1.43) 0.56 0.73 (0.40–1.25) 0.26 PeAF 1.25 (0.68–2.16) 0.45 0.98 (0.52–1.75) 0.94 LSAF 1.10 (0.46–2.23) 0.82 0.70 (0.28–1.53) 0.39 LVEF>50% 0.27 (0.16–0.48) <0.001 0.57 (0.31–1.09) 0.09 Past history of HF 7.06 (4.18–11.6) <0.001 4.67 (2.51–8.41) <0.001 CKD 4.74 (2.08–9.39) <0.001 2.23 (0.94–4.69) 0.07 AF, Atrial fibrillation; PeAF, Persistent AF; LSAF; Long standing AF; HF, Heart failure; CKD, Chronic kidney disease. Figure 1 Conclusions Successfully maintained SR was associated with reduced long-term risk for death or HF hospitalization in real world patients undergoing AF ablation.

Download Full-text

Abstract 17014: The Impact of Risk Score (CHADS2 versus CHADS2-Vasc) on Long-term Outcomes After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.130.suppl_2.17014 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽

Author(s):

Victoria Jacobs ◽

Heidi T May ◽

Tami L Bair ◽

Brian G Crandall ◽

Michael Cutler ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Heart Failure ◽

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Risk Score ◽

Collaborative Study ◽

Superior Performance ◽

Long Term Outcomes ◽

Af Ablation ◽

The Impact ◽

Af Recurrence

Background: Risk stratification tools are needed to better select candidates for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Both the CHADS2 and CHADS2-VASC scores have utility in predicting AF-related outcomes and guiding anticoagulation treatment. We sought to determine if these risk scores predict long-term outcomes after AF ablation and if one risk score provides comparative superior performance. Methods: CHADS2 and CHADS2-VASC scores were calculated in 2179 AF ablation patients enrolled into Intermountain Heart Collaborative Study. CHADS2 and CHADS2-VASC were categorized by recursive partitioning categories as CHADS2: 0-1, 2-4, and >4 and CHADS2-VASC: 0-2, 2-5, >5. Patient outcomes were analyzed over 5 years for AF/Aflutter recurrence and MACE (death, stroke, heart failure hospitalization and AF/Aflutter recurrence). Results: Average age was 65.7±10.5 years and 61.1% were male. Both scores incrementally predicted risk of AF recurrence, stroke, heart failure, and death at 5 years (Figure). Increasing CHADS2 (hazard ratio [HR] =1.19, p<0.001) and CHADS2-VASC (HR=1.15, p<0.0001) scores were both associated with AF/Aflutter recurrence. Results were similar for MACE: with increasing CHADS2 (HR=1.20, p<0.0001) and CHADS2-VASC (HR=1.15, p<0.0001) scores associated with risk. When CHADS2 and CHADS2-VASC were modeled simultaneously, only CHADS-VASC significantly predicted AF recurrence (HR=1.13, p=0.001) and MACE (HR=1.13, p=0.001). Conclusion: Both the CHADS2 and CHADS2-VASC scores were excellent in stratifying patients for 5-year outcomes after AF ablation. However, the CHADS2-VASC score was superior to CHADS2 when accounting for all baseline variables for predicting both AF recurrence and AF-related morbidities.

Download Full-text

Implementation of an emergency department atrial fibrillation and flutter pathway improves rates of appropriate anticoagulation, reduces length of stay and thirty-day revisit rates for congestive heart failure

CJEM ◽

10.1017/cem.2017.418 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 20 (3) ◽

pp. 392-400 ◽

Cited By ~ 11

Author(s):

David Barbic ◽

Chris DeWitt ◽

Devin Harris ◽

Robert Stenstrom ◽

Eric Grafstein ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Heart Failure ◽

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Emergency Department ◽

Congestive Heart Failure ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

Primary Objective ◽

Evidence Based ◽

Post Evaluation ◽

Atrial Fibrillation And Flutter ◽

The Impact

AbstractObjectivesAn evidence-based emergency department (ED) atrial fibrillation and flutter (AFF) pathway was developed to improve care. The primary objective was to measure rates of new anticoagulation (AC) on ED discharge for AFF patients who were not AC correctly upon presentation.MethodsThis is a pre-post evaluation from April to December 2013 measuring the impact of our pathway on rates of new AC and other performance measures in patients with uncomplicated AFF solely managed by emergency physicians. A standardized chart review identified demographics, comorbidities, and ED treatments. The primary outcome was the rate of new AC. Secondary outcomes were ED length of stay (LOS), referrals to AFF clinic, ED revisit rates, and 30-day rates of return visits for congestive heart failure (CHF), stroke, major bleeding, and death.ResultsED AFF patients totalling 301 (129 pre-pathway [PRE]; 172 post-pathway [POST]) were included; baseline demographics were similar between groups. The rates of AC at ED presentation were 18.6% (PRE) and 19.7% (POST). The rates of new AC on ED discharge were 48.6 % PRE (95% confidence interval [CI] 42.1%-55.1%) and 70.2% POST (62.1%-78.3%) (20.6% [p<0.01; 15.1-26.3]). Median ED LOS decreased from 262 to 218 minutes (44 minutes [p<0.03; 36.2-51.8]). Thirty-day rates of ED revisits for CHF decreased from 13.2% to 2.3% (10.9%; p<0.01; 8.1%-13.7%), and rates of other measures were similar.ConclusionsThe evidence-based pathway led to an improvement in the rate of patients with new AC upon discharge, a reduction in ED LOS, and decreased revisit rates for CHF.

Download Full-text

Under-recognition of heart failure in patients with atrial fibrillation and the impact of gender: a UK population-based cohort study

BMC Medicine ◽

10.1186/s12916-021-02048-8 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 19 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Rosita Zakeri ◽

Ann D. Morgan ◽

Varun Sundaram ◽

Chloe Bloom ◽

John G. F. Cleland ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Heart Failure ◽

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Loop Diuretic ◽

Diuretic Therapy ◽

Surrogate Marker ◽

Population Based ◽

Loop Diuretics ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) complicated by heart failure (HF) have a poor prognosis. We investigated whether long term loop-diuretic therapy in patients with AF and no known diagnosis of HF, as a potential surrogate marker of undiagnosed HF, is also associated with worse outcomes. Methods Adults with incident AF were identified from UK primary and secondary care records between 2004 and 2016. Repeat prescriptions for loop diuretics, without a diagnosis of HF or documented non-cardiac indication, were classified as ‘isolated’ loop diuretic use. Results Amongst 124,256 people with incident AF (median 76 years, 47% women), 22,001 (17.7%) had a diagnosis of HF, and 22,325 (18.0%) had isolated loop diuretic use. During 2.9 (LQ-UQ 1–6) years’ follow-up, 12,182 patients were diagnosed with HF (incidence rate 3.2 [95% CI 3.1–3.3]/100 person-years). Of these, 3999 (32.8%) had prior isolated loop diuretic use, including 31% of patients diagnosed with HF following an emergency hospitalisation. The median time from AF to HF diagnosis was 3.6 (1.2–7.7) years in men versus 5.1 (1.8–9.9) years in women (p = 0.0001). In adjusted models, patients with isolated loop diuretic use had higher mortality (HR 1.42 [95% CI 1.37–1.47], p < 0.0005) and risk of HF hospitalisation (HR 1.60 [95% CI 1.42–1.80], p < 0.0005) than patients with no HF or loop diuretic use, and comparably poor survival to patients with diagnosed HF. Conclusions Loop diuretics are commonly prescribed to patients with AF and may indicate increased cardiovascular risk. Targeted evaluation of these patients may allow earlier HF diagnosis, timely intervention, and better outcomes, particularly amongst women with AF, in whom HF appears to be under-recognised and diagnosed later than in men.

Download Full-text