A comparative study of logistic model tree, random forest, and classification and regression tree models for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility

CATENA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 151 ◽  
pp. 147-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Chen ◽  
Xiaoshen Xie ◽  
Jiale Wang ◽  
Biswajeet Pradhan ◽  
Haoyuan Hong ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. P798-P799
Author(s):  
Charlotte Teunissen ◽  
Niki S.M. Schoonenboom ◽  
Pieter Jelle Visser ◽  
Wiesje M. Van der Flier ◽  
Dirk Knol ◽  
...  

Forests ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 830 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viet-Ha Nhu ◽  
Ayub Mohammadi ◽  
Himan Shahabi ◽  
Baharin Bin Ahmad ◽  
Nadhir Al-Ansari ◽  
...  

We used remote sensing techniques and machine learning to detect and map landslides, and landslide susceptibility in the Cameron Highlands, Malaysia. We located 152 landslides using a combination of interferometry synthetic aperture radar (InSAR), Google Earth (GE), and field surveys. Of the total slide locations, 80% (122 landslides) were utilized for training the selected algorithms, and the remaining 20% (30 landslides) were applied for validation purposes. We employed 17 conditioning factors, including slope angle, aspect, elevation, curvature, profile curvature, stream power index (SPI), topographic wetness index (TWI), lithology, soil type, land cover, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), distance to river, distance to fault, distance to road, river density, fault density, and road density, which were produced from satellite imageries, geological map, soil maps, and a digital elevation model (DEM). We used these factors to produce landslide susceptibility maps using logistic regression (LR), logistic model tree (LMT), and random forest (RF) models. To assess prediction accuracy of the models we employed the following statistical measures: negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), specificity, root-mean-squared error (RMSE), accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Our results indicated that the AUC was 92%, 90%, and 88% for the LMT, LR, and RF algorithms, respectively. To assess model performance, we also applied non-parametric statistical tests of Friedman and Wilcoxon, where the results revealed that there were no practical differences among the used models in the study area. While landslide mapping in tropical environment such as Cameron Highlands remains difficult, the remote sensing (RS) along with machine learning techniques, such as the LMT model, show promise for landslide susceptibility mapping in the study area.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document