scholarly journals Prognostic Impact of Additional Chromosomal Abnormalities in Egyptian Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. S292
Author(s):  
Yasser Elnahass ◽  
Fatma Elrefaey ◽  
Magda Assem ◽  
Magdy Saber ◽  
Sarah Abdullah ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (B) ◽  
pp. 623-630
Author(s):  
Yasser H. ElNahass ◽  
Magda M. Assem ◽  
Magdy M. Saber ◽  
Sarah K. Abdalla ◽  
Hossam K. Mahmoud ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Emergence of additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is associated with disease progression to advanced phases and reflects the genetic instability of CML. AIM: Is to evaluate the frequency of ACAs in chronic phase (CP) and advanced disease (AP) CML patients and study their impact on patient’s outcome, overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). RESULTS: The studied group (n = 73) included 31 males (43%) and 42 females (57%). Median age of patients at diagnosis was 37 years (17–76). Median TLC was 208×109/L (2.1–784.2), median Hb was 9.4 g/dL (5.7–13), and median platelets count was 290.5×109/L (13–1271). We identified 32 patients (44%) with ACAs. ACAs emergence was significantly associated with advanced phases of CML (13/21, 62%) compared to CP (19/52, 36%) (p = 0.048). ACAs were associated with lower median OS and EFS in CP compared to AP (38 vs. 120 ms) and (58.3 vs. 77 ms) (p = 0.026 and p = 0.065, respectively). Early molecular responders (6/17, 35%) at 3 months, and 6 months (10/26, 38%) developed ACAs less than nonoptimal responders. Disease phase, hepatomegaly and bone marrow eosinophilia were significant predictors of OS (p < 0.001, p = 0.02, p = 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSION: Early identification of ACAs in Ph+ metaphases at diagnosis and during therapy predicts CML outcome. ACAs emergence occurred at a higher frequency and at a younger age in our CML patients and are related to inferior EFS and OS.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5537-5537
Author(s):  
Nader I Al-Dewik ◽  
Hisham Morsi ◽  
Rola Ghasoub ◽  
Mohamed A. Yassin

Abstract Background: The introduction of Imatinib Mesylate (IM) has revolutionized the outcome of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) patients. However, the success of the rationally designed therapy is tempered by the understanding that a substantial proportion of CML patients fail treatment. In Qatar, 54% of CML patients do fail IM according to European leukemia net (ELN) recommendations 2013. Point mutation & unique tri-nucleotide insertions explained only 14% of treatment failure. Additional chromosomal abnormalities were the most common cause of IM failure in our patients’ cohort & were documented in 50% of cases. 14% of patients stopped IM due to intolerance & the mechanisms of resistance remained unknown in 28% of patients. Other cause such as patients’ adherence to IM is being prospectively investigated. Therefore, Non adherence to IM must be ruled out as a possible cause of lack of optimal response before considering such patients to be IM-resistant & switching them to next-line treatment. Aim: To correlate between CML patients’ adherence to IM treatment & their responses and identify the factors affecting non-adherence. Methods: 36 CML patients (5 citizens & 31 residents) are consented into the study. adherence to Imatinib was assessed using four different techniques: calculation of the Medication Possession Ratio (MPR), electronic Medical Records (eMR), survey questionnaire & Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS). MPR is defined as the sum of the days' supply of medication divided by the number of days between the first fill & the last refill. Patients medications history was obtained from questionnaire, pharmacy electronic Medical record (eMR) & studying drug – drug interactions was done using MICROMEDEX® 1.0 (Healthcare Series). The Questionnaire used to identify potential factors revolving around the patient's lifestyle, affordability & knowledge related to IM, in addition to standardized evaluation based on the 9-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS) ranging from 1 to 13. Scores ≤10 indicates non adherence whereas ≥ 11 indicates adherence. Patient adherence was tracked electronically using the Medication Electronic Monitoring System (MEMS) that provided real time measures of adherence for a period up to 4 months. 95 Peripheral blood (PB) samples were collected & the level of BCR-ABL1 transcripts was measured via RT-QPCR. The ELN 2013 recommendations for the management of CML was adopted & employed in this study to assess the response/resistance of patients to treatment. Responses were defined at the haematological, cytogenetic & molecular levels. Patients responses were classified into optimal, suboptimal or failure. Results: Out of 36 patients, 23 patients were adherent (MMAS, MPR &MEMS were ≥ 80%) & 13 patients were classified as non-adherent (MMAS, MPR &MEMS were <80 % ) All adherent patients were optimally responded to the treatment (achieved CCyR & MMR) while the 13 non-adherent patients failed the treatment (2 patients were intolerant, 9 patients did not achieved CCyR & molecular response & 2 patients developed additional chromosomal abnormalities. Questionnaire feedback results showed that 69% patients could not afford to pay the remaining 10% of its cost, the other factors such as lack of knowledge (comprehensive & insight of illness) & illiteracy were observed in 35% & 30% of patients respectively. Discussion & conclusion: Due to high rate of Imatinib failure in Qatar, patient’s adherence to treatment was studied. Non adherence to the treatment was one of the most common causes of Imatinib failure in our patients’ cohort & was documented in 36% of cases. Economic factor (Unaffordable drug price) was one of the main causes of non-adherence & efforts should be made locally to improve access to medications for cancer diseases. Other risk factors associated with poor adherence can be improved by close monitoring & dose adjustment. Monitoring risk factors for poor adherence in combination with patient education that includes direct communication between the health care teams doctors, nurses pharmacists & patients are essential components for maximizing the benefits of TKI therapy & could rectify this problem. Our preliminary results showed that patients’ response to treatment may be directly linked to patient adherence to the treatment. However, further in-depth & specific analysis may be necessary in a larger cohort. Disclosures Al-Dewik: Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC): Employment, HMC Medical Director's Grant Competition (GC) 1013A Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Morsi:HMC: Employment, Research Funding. Ghasoub:HMC: Employment, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1577-1577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghayas C. Issa ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Gautam Borthakur ◽  
Srdan Verstovsek ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs) in the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative metaphases that emerge as patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been reported during treatment with imatinib. It has been suggested that these might be associated with an inferior outcome and in rare instances lead to the emergence of a new malignant clone resulting in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Jabbour et. al, Blood 2007). This phenomenon has not been well characterized when other TKIs are used. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients treated on imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, and ponatinib frontline trials to assess the frequency and prognostic impact of ACAs appearing during the treatment after achieving cytogenetic response. Patients and Methods A total of 524 patients with CML were evaluated with a median age at diagnosis of 48 years (range 15 to 86). These included 236 patients treated with imatinib, 125 with nilotinib, 118 with dasatinib and 45 with ponatinib. All the patients were treated in clinical trials approved by the institutional board review and signed an informed consent in accordance with institutional guidelines and in accordance with the declaration of Helsenki. Conventional cytogenetic analysis was done in bone marrow cells using standard G-banding technique at baseline, every 3 months during the first year, then every 6-12 months. Clonal ACAs were identified as abnormalities present in ≥2/20 metaphases or, if only one metaphase, present in ≥2 consecutive assessments. Results After a median follow-up of 83.8 months (range 0.3-176.6 months) 13% (72/524) patients had ACAs, of which 7% (41/524) were clonal. ACAs were seen in 11% (27/236) of patients on imatinib compared to 11% (13/118, p=0.9) on dasatinib, 19 % (24/125, p= 0.04) on nilotinib, and 17% (8/45, p=0.2) on ponatinib. Six patients had both clonal evolution (CE) and ACAs at different times. The median number of metaphases containing ACAs was 5/20 (range 1 to 20) with an average of 7/20. Most appeared within the first year of the start of the TKI (median 6 months, range 3-72 months); they first appeared after 12 months of therapy in 21 of the 72 (29%) patients. ACAs were transient and were detected in 2 or less time points in 52 of the 72 (72%) cases. The most common clonal ACAs were - Y (13/41) and +8 (4/41). The rates of cytogenetic and molecular responses were similar for patients with and without clonal ACAs (CCyR: 88% vs 91%; p=0.55) (MMR: 78% vs 86%, p=0.20). Having clonal ACAs did not affect the rate of deep molecular response either (MR4.5 71% vs 67%; p =0.65). There was no significant difference in EFS and OS (5y EFS 73% vs 86%; p=0.19) (5y OS 77% vs 93%; p=0.06) although there was a trend for lower rates for both. Responses and clinical outcomes were similar between different TKIs for patients with and without clonal ACAs. One patient with -7 treated with ponatinib developed MDS. Monosomy 7 appeared 9 months from the start of treatment in 9/20 metaphases and persisted. He was taken off ponatinib because of pancytopenia. He subsequently received bosutinib, achieved and maintained a CCyR. A high-risk MDS was documented approximately 1 year after appearance of the -7 clone. He was started on decitabine and achieved a partial cytogenetic response for MDS. Another patient in the imatinib cohort with -7 developed secondary AML (CCyR for CML) and died from a multiple organ failure after allogeneic stem cell transplant from a one antigen-mismatched unrelated donor. There was a third patient with -7 that later had CE and developed Ph+ CML blast phase. Conclusion ACAs are rare and mostly transient events that appear during the treatment of CML with TKIs. These changes do not affect responses or clinical outcomes, independent of what TKI is used. A small subset of patients with -7 may develop AML or MDS warranting close monitoring of patients with changes that are reminiscent of those diseases. Molecular analysis after appearance of ACAs could help identify mutations driving the Ph-clone into AML or MDS. Disclosures Pemmaraju: Stemline: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; LFB: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cortes:BerGenBio AS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ambit: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Jenssen: Consultancy.


2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 545-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ridvan Ali ◽  
Fahir Ozkalemkas ◽  
Vildan Ozkocaman ◽  
Tahsin Yakut ◽  
Hulya Ozturk Nazlioglu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunila Tashfeen Arif ◽  
Rafia Mahmood ◽  
Saleem Ahmed Khan ◽  
Tahir Khadim

Objective: To determine the frequency of additional chromosomal abnormalities in Philadelphia chromosome positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) by conventional cytogenetic analysis. Methods: This descriptive cross sectional study was conducted at Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP), Rawalpindi, from January 2012 to December 2016. A total number of 528 newly diagnosed CML patients were included in the study. The subjects were tested for the presence of Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome and other additional cytogenetic abnormalities by conventional cytogenetic analysis interpreted according to International System of Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (ISCN) criteria. Molecular analysis for BCR-ABL was also performed for each patient. The additional cytogenetic abnormalities were then classified into major route abnormalities and minor route abnormalities. Results: Out of the 528 newly diagnosed CML patients, 378 (71.6%) were males and 150 (28.4%) were females. The age of patients ranged between 18 to 74 years. Four hundred and ninety-eight (94.3%) patients showed Philadelphia chromosome on karyotyping while 30 (5.7%) were negative for the Philadelphia chromosome. On analysis of these 498 Philadelphia positive patients, additional cytogenetic aberrations were detected in 26 (4.9%) patients. Of these, 7 (1.3%) had major route abnormalities while 19 (3.6%) had minor route abnormalities. Conclusion: The frequency of additional chromosomal abnormalities in our study were not in accordance with previous local and international studies. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.2.1384 How to cite this:Tashfeen S, Mahmood R, Khan SA, Khadim T. Additional chromosomal abnormalities in Philadelphia positive chronic myeloid leukemia. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(2):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.2.1384 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document