Safety of the anti-CD19 antibody Tafasitamab in long term responders from a phase II trial for relapsed lymphoma

Abstract Abstract 3303 INTRODUCTION: Chronic uncontrolled complement activation drives systemic thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) and life-threatening complications in aHUS. In the initial 26-wk, phase II trial of eculizumab, (ECU) a terminal complement inhibitor, in pts with aHUS requiring chronic PE/PI for an extended period of time, a statistically significant and sustained suppression of TMA was observed. In addition, no pt required PE/PI, no new dialysis was required and all pts either maintained/improved renal function in the absence of PE/PI (Licht ASN 2011). We report longer follow-up data from this trial. METHODS: Pts ≥12 yrs with aHUS, receiving chronic PE/PI on an unchanged regimen were enrolled in a controlled, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial. After an 8-week observation period, pts discontinued PE/PI and started ECU (900mg/week for 4 wks, 1200mg at wk 5, then 1200mg q2 wks). Pts received a meningococcal vaccine. Primary endpoint: TMA event-free status defined as ≥12 consecutive wks of stable platelet count, no PE/PI and no new dialysis. Secondary endpoints included TMA intervention rate (no. of PE/PI and new dialysis events/pt/day), renal function, and safety. Pts continued into an extension trial. RESULTS: Of 20 pts (median age=28 yrs) who received ECU through Wk 26 of the initial trial, 19 pts continued ECU treatment into the extension trial. Mean (SD) duration of ECU treatment was 60 (12) wks at data cut-off. Median time from diagnosis to screening=48 mo (0.66–286). Median time from overt clinical symptoms of aHUS to screening=8.6 mo (1.2–45). Median no. of PE/PI sessions per pt during current clinical presentation=62 (20–230). Median duration of eGFR ≤60 mL/min/1.73m2=180 days (23–485). Six pts had no complement regulatory factor mutation (CRFM) identified. Ongoing treatment with long-term ECU was associated with continued improvements in TMA intervention rate and TMA event-free status and further improvement in renal function (Table). Long-term ECU treatment showed a highly significant time-dependent improvement in eGFR (p<0.0001) with a significant improvement from baseline of 8 mL/min/1.73m2 at 1 yr (p<0.0001). PE/PI or new dialysis was not required with chronic ECU treatment in any pt through Wk 26 or during ongoing long-term ECU therapy (through data cut-off). ECU was similarly effective in pts with/without identified CRFMs. ECU was well tolerated; only 7 pts had adverse events deemed possibly or probably related to drug (mild to moderate in severity). The extension trial continues. CONCLUSIONS: Despite PE/PI, >50% of pts with aHUS are expected to die, require dialysis or have permanent renal damage within the first year of diagnosis. In this trial, all pts treated with ECU for a mean duration of >1 year are still alive and none progressed to ESRD or required new dialysis with sustained ECU treatment. Importantly, compared with historical outcomes with chronic PE/PI, initiation of sustained, long-term ECU therapy, without PE/PI, was associated with a highly significant time-dependent improvement in eGFR. Switching to chronic ECU therapy significantly changed the course of the disease in severe and prolonged renal insufficiency pts, resulting in sustained suppression of TMA. These data further demonstrate ECU to be the new standard of care for aHUS. Disclosures: Licht: Alexion: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Eculizumab but as part of clinical controlled trials. Muus:Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Legendre:Alexion: Research Funding. Douglas:Alexion: Genzyme, but not relevant to current submission, Research Funding. Hourmant:Alexion: Research Funding. Delmas:Alexion: Research Funding. Herthelius:Alexion: Research Funding. Trivelli:Alexion: Research Funding. Goodship:Alexion: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bedrosian:Alexion: Employment. Loirat:Alexion: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase II Study of Rituximab in Newly Diagnosed Stage IA Nodular Lymphocyte-Predominant Hodgkin Lymphoma (NLPHL): A Report From the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.2711.2711 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 2711-2711

Author(s):

Dennis A. Eichenauer ◽

Michael Fuchs ◽

Annette Pluetschow ◽

Beate Klimm ◽

Teresa Halbsguth ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Phase Ii Trial ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Free Survival ◽

Stage Ia ◽

Cd20 Antibody ◽

Anti Cd20

Abstract Abstract 2711 Background: Nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) is a rare subtype of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) accounting for about 5% of cases. The clinical course is usually more indolent than in classical HL (cHL) resulting in an excellent long-term prognosis. This is particularly true for patients diagnosed with early-stage NLPHL representing the majority of cases. However, current standard treatment consisting of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (RT) is associated with an increased risk of late toxicity. Thus, there is a need for novel treatment strategies. Since CD20 is consistently expressed on the malignant lymphocyte-predominant (LP) cells, anti-CD20 antibody treatment appears to be a promising option. After impressive response rates were reported in relapsed NLPHL patients, the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) initiated a trial to evaluate the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab in newly diagnosed stage IA NLPHL without clinical risk factors. Methods: Between June 2006 and October 2007, 29 patients from 23 sites were enrolled in this multicenter phase II trial. Study entry was restricted to adult patients (age 18 to 75) with biopsy-proven stage IA NLPHL without clinical risk factors. Treatment consisted of four weekly infusions of the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab at a dose of 375 mg/m2. Efficacy endpoints included remission status as assessed by computed tomography (CT) four weeks after completion of treatment, overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at two years; feasibility endpoints were acute treatment-related toxicities, adverse events, dose reductions and therapy delays. Results: Twenty-eight patients were eligible for the final analysis of this phase II trial; 71.4% of patients were male, 72% had supradiaphragmatic disease and the median age was 40 years. Treatment was conducted in the outpatient setting in the majority of cases. Rituximab was well tolerated; no grade III/IV toxicities were observed. Transfusions of erythrocytes or platelets were not required. At final restaging four weeks after the last rituximab application, 24 patients (85.7%) were in CR/CRu and four patients (14.3%) had partial remission (PR). Thus, overall response rate (ORR) was 100%. After a median follow-up of 43 months, all patients were still alive. Progression-free survival rate estimates at two, three and four years were 85.3%, 81.4% and 77.1%, respectively. Seven patients (25%) have relapsed and two patients developed secondary solid tumors. All patients with NLPHL relapse were successfully salvaged. Conclusions: The results of the present trial confirm the previously reported excellent response of NLPHL patients to rituximab. However, with a relapse rate of 25% at a median observation time of 43 months, rituximab does not seem to be as effective as RT alone or combined-modality strategies in stage IA NLPHL patients. Nonetheless, anti-CD20 antibodies have a favorable toxicity profile and may be offered to selected patients who are at particular risk for long-term side effects such as secondary malignancies. In addition, the combination of anti-CD20 antibodies and chemotherapy may also improve efficacy and decrease toxicity of NLPHL treatment in early unfavorable, advanced or relapsed disease. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text