A methodology for increasing the signal to noise ratio for the misfire detection at high speed in a high performance engine

2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolò Cavina ◽  
Giovanni Cipolla ◽  
Francesco Marcigliano ◽  
Davide Moro ◽  
Luca Poggio
Keyword(s):  
High Speed ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Signal To Noise ◽  
Noise Ratio ◽  
Misfire Detection

scholarly journals A Methodology for Increasing the Signal to Noise Ratio for the Misfire Detection at High Speed in a High Performance Engine

2004 ◽  
Vol 37 (22) ◽  
pp. 379-384
Author(s):  
Nicolò Cavina ◽  
Giovanni Cipollo ◽  
Francesco Marcigliano ◽  
Davide Moro ◽  
Luca Poggio
Keyword(s):  
High Speed ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Signal To Noise ◽  
Noise Ratio ◽  
Misfire Detection

Study on the measurement speed and signal to noise ratio of multi tone burst wave for high speed non-contact acoustic inspection method

2016 ◽  
Vol 140 (4) ◽  
pp. 3212-3212
Author(s):  
Nobuaki Kosuge ◽  
Tsuneyosi Sugimoto ◽  
Kazuko Sugimoto ◽  
Chitose Kuroda ◽  
Noriyuki Utagawa
Keyword(s):  
High Speed ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Tone Burst ◽  
Signal To Noise ◽  
Inspection Method ◽  
Noise Ratio ◽  
Acoustic Inspection

Improvement of signal-to-noise ratio in remote NQR spectroscopy by high-speed sampling

1995 ◽  
Vol 235 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 508-510
Author(s):  
Geng-Ying Li ◽  
Xue-Cheng Xu ◽  
Yi Liu ◽  
Xue-Wen Wu
Keyword(s):  
High Speed ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Signal To Noise ◽  
Noise Ratio ◽  
High Speed Sampling

Improving the signal-to-noise ratio of high-speed contact mode atomic force microscopy

2012 ◽  
Vol 83 (8) ◽  
pp. 083710 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. D. Payton ◽  
L. Picco ◽  
M. J. Miles ◽  
M. E. Homer ◽  
A. R. Champneys
Keyword(s):  
Atomic Force Microscopy ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Signal To Noise ◽  
Contact Mode ◽  
Force Microscopy ◽  
Atomic Force ◽  
Noise Ratio ◽  
Mode Atomic Force Microscopy

Homogeneity of the 18 QuickSIN™ Lists

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (03) ◽  
pp. 157-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel A. McArdle ◽  
Richard H. Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Signal To Noise ◽  
Speech In Noise ◽  
Performance Variability ◽  
Noise Test ◽  
Noise Ratio ◽  
Db Difference

The purpose of this study was to determine the list equivalency of the 18 QuickSIN™ (Quick Speech in Noise test) lists. Individuals with normal hearing (n = 24) and with sensorineural hearing loss (n = 72) were studied. Mean recognition performances on the 18 lists by the listeners with normal hearing were 2.8 to 4.3 dB SNR (signal-to-noise ratio), whereas the range was 10.0 to 14.3 dB SNR for the listeners with hearing loss. The psychometric functions for each list showed high performance variability across lists for listeners with hearing loss but not for listeners with normal hearing. For listeners with hearing loss, Lists 4, 5, 13, and 16 fell outside of the critical difference. The data from this study suggest nine lists that provide homogenous results for listeners with and without hearing loss. Finally, there was an 8.7 dB difference in performances between the two groups indicating a more favorable signal-to-noise ratio required by the listeners with hearing loss to obtain equal performance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document