Effectiveness and implementability of state-level naloxone access policies: Expert consensus from an online modified-Delphi process

Introduction: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) has emerged as a promising resuscitation strategy for select patients suffering out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), though limited data exists regarding detailed best practices for the complex process of initiating ECPR following OHCA. Hypothesis: Expert consensus using a modified Delphi process can systematically identify detailed best practices for ECPR initiation following adult non-traumatic OHCA. Methods: We utilized a modified Delphi process consisting of two survey rounds and a virtual consensus meeting to systematically identify best practices for ECPR initiation following adult non-traumatic OHCA. A modified Delphi process builds content validity and is an accepted method to develop consensus by eliciting expert opinions through multiple rounds of questionnaires. Consensus was achieved when items reached a high level of agreement, defined as greater than 80% responses for a particular item rated a 4 or 5 on a 5-point Likert scale. Results: Snowball sampling generated a panel of 14 content experts, composed of physicians from four continents and four primary specialties. Seven existing institutional protocols for ECPR cannulation following OHCA were identified and merged into a single comprehensive list of 216 items. The panel ultimately reached consensus on 95 items: Prior to Patient Arrival (8 items), Inclusion Criteria (8), Exclusion Criteria (7), Patient Arrival (8), ECPR Cannulation (21), Go On Pump (17), and Post-Cannulation (26). Conclusion: We present a list of essential items for initiation of ECPR following adult non-traumatic OHCA, generated using a modified Delphi process from an international panel of content experts. These findings can benefit centers currently performing ECPR for OHCA in quality assurance and performance improvement, and can serve as a template for new ECPR programs to follow.

Download Full-text

Diagnostic criteria and symptom grading for delayed gastric conduit emptying after esophagectomy for cancer: international expert consensus based on a modified Delphi process

Diseases of the Esophagus ◽

10.1093/dote/doz074 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 33 (4) ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

M Konradsson ◽

M I van Berge Henegouwen ◽

C Bruns ◽

M A Chaudry ◽

E Cheong ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Diagnostic Criteria ◽

Gastric Conduit ◽

Delphi Process ◽

Adverse Outcomes ◽

Water Soluble ◽

Expert Consensus ◽

Barium Swallow ◽

International Expert ◽

Modified Delphi ◽

Esophagectomy For Cancer

Abstract Delayed gastric conduit emptying (DGCE) after esophagectomy for cancer is associated with adverse outcomes and troubling symptoms. Widely accepted diagnostic criteria and a symptom grading tool for DGCE are missing. This hampers the interpretation and comparison of studies. A modified Delphi process, using repeated web-based questionnaires, combined with live interim group discussions was conducted by 33 experts within the field, from Europe, North America, and Asia. DGCE was divided into early DGCE if present within 14 days of surgery and late if present later than 14 days after surgery. The final criteria for early DGCE, accepted by 25 of 27 (93%) experts, were as follows: >500 mL diurnal nasogastric tube output measured on the morning of postoperative day 5 or later or >100% increased gastric tube width on frontal chest x-ray projection together with the presence of an air–fluid level. The final criteria for late DGCE accepted by 89% of the experts were as follows: the patient should have ‘quite a bit’ or ‘very much’ of at least two of the following symptoms; early satiety/fullness, vomiting, nausea, regurgitation or inability to meet caloric need by oral intake and delayed contrast passage on upper gastrointestinal water-soluble contrast radiogram or on timed barium swallow. A symptom grading tool for late DGCE was constructed grading each symptom as: ‘not at all’, ‘a little’, ‘quite a bit’, or ‘very much’, generating 0, 1, 2, or 3 points, respectively. For the five symptoms retained in the diagnostic criteria for late DGCE, the minimum score would be 0, and the maximum score would be 15. The final symptom grading tool for late DGCE was accepted by 27 of 31 (87%) experts. For the first time, diagnostic criteria for early and late DGCE and a symptom grading tool for late DGCE are available, based on an international expert consensus process.

Download Full-text

Nutrition in Primary Health Care: Using a Delphi Process To Design New Interdisciplinary Services

Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research ◽

10.3148/67.0.2006.s14 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 67 (S1) ◽

pp. S14-S29 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Paula Brauer ◽

Linda Dietrich ◽

Bridget Davidson ◽

Keyword(s):

Primary Care ◽

Health Care ◽

Health Care Providers ◽

Administrative Support ◽

Care Service ◽

Delphi Process ◽

Care Providers ◽

Modified Delphi ◽

Nutrition Services ◽

Key Features

Purpose: A modified Delphi process was used to identify key features of interdisciplinary nutrition services, including provider roles and responsibilities for Ontario Family Health Networks (FHNs), a family physician-based type of primary care. Methods: Twenty-three representatives from interested professional organizations, including three FHN demonstration sites, completed a modified Delphi process. Participants reviewed evidence from a systematic literature review, a patient survey, a costing analysis, and key informant interview results before undertaking the Delphi process. Statements describing various options for services were developed at an in-person meeting, which was followed by two rounds of e-mail questionnaires. Teleconference discussions were held between rounds. Results: An interdisciplinary model with differing and complementary roles for health care providers emerged from the process. Additional key features addressing screening for nutrition problems, health promotion and disease prevention, team collaboration, planning and evaluation, administrative support, access to care, and medical directives/delegated acts were identified. Under the proposed model, the registered dietitian is the team member responsible for managing all aspects of nutrition services, from needs assessment to program delivery, as well as for supporting all providers’ nutrition services. Conclusions: The proposed interdisciplinary nutrition services model merits evaluation of cost, effectiveness, applicability, and sustainability in team-based primary care service settings.

Download Full-text

Identifying the capabilities most important for veterinary employability using a modified Delphi process

Veterinary Record ◽

10.1002/vetr.777 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Melinda A. Bell ◽

Martin A. Cake ◽

Laura T. King ◽

Caroline F. Mansfield

Keyword(s):

Delphi Process ◽

Modified Delphi

Download Full-text

Development of an explicit tool assessing potentially inappropriate medication use in Hong Kong elder patients

BMC Geriatrics ◽

10.1186/s12877-021-02024-0 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Huanyu Zhang ◽

Eliza LY Wong ◽

Eng-kiong Yeoh ◽

Bosco HM Ma

Keyword(s):

Hong Kong ◽

Inappropriate Medication ◽

Delphi Process ◽

Potentially Inappropriate Medication ◽

Medical Conditions ◽

Modified Delphi ◽

Adverse Health Outcomes ◽

Elder Patients ◽

Prescribing Quality ◽

Prescribing Practice

Abstract Background Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use has adverse effects on health, particularly in elder patients. Various country-specific explicit criteria have been developed to measure the appropriateness of prescribing worldwide. However, it is difficult to apply the criteria developed from other regions to measure and guide the local prescribing practice in Hong Kong. This study aims to develop a Hong Kong-specific PIM assessing tool from previously published criteria and validate this tool using the modified Delphi method. Methods A disease-oriented Hong Kong-specific preliminary PIM list was developed based on nine sets of reference criteria selected from a literature review. Any medication or medication class appeared in at least two sets of the reference criteria as well as its related medical conditions were selected as PIM candidates. After examining the availability of PIM candidates by the Hong Kong Hospital Authority drug formulary, the Hong Kong-specific preliminary PIM list was validated by a two-round of modified Delphi process. Eight experts from different specialties were invited to rate the degree of inappropriateness of each PIM candidate using a five-point Likert scale. The experts were also encouraged to propose therapeutic alternatives and new PIM candidates not covered by the preliminary PIM list. The PIM candidates that the expert panel didn’t reach consensus on were excluded from the final Hong Kong-specific PIM list. Results After two rounds of the Delphi process, eight PIM candidates remained questionable and thus were excluded from the PIM list. The final Hong Kong-specific PIM list included a total of 164 statements applicable to older adults aged 65 years or above, among which 77 were under PIMs independent of diagnoses, and 87 were under PIMs considering specific medical conditions. Conclusions The Hong Kong-specific PIM list can be used as a quality measure and an educational tool to improve the local prescribing quality. Further studies should validate its association with adverse health outcomes in clinical and research settings.

Download Full-text

Multi-organ point-of-care ultrasound for COVID-19 (PoCUS4COVID): international expert consensus

Critical Care ◽

10.1186/s13054-020-03369-5 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 24 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Arif Hussain ◽

Gabriele Via ◽

Lawrence Melniker ◽

Alberto Goffi ◽

Guido Tavazzi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Lung Ultrasound ◽

Expert Panel ◽

Point Of Care ◽

Expert Consensus ◽

Future Research ◽

Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽

The Past ◽

Modified Delphi ◽

Grade Methodology

AbstractCOVID-19 has caused great devastation in the past year. Multi-organ point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) including lung ultrasound (LUS) and focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) as a clinical adjunct has played a significant role in triaging, diagnosis and medical management of COVID-19 patients. The expert panel from 27 countries and 6 continents with considerable experience of direct application of PoCUS on COVID-19 patients presents evidence-based consensus using GRADE methodology for the quality of evidence and an expedited, modified-Delphi process for the strength of expert consensus. The use of ultrasound is suggested in many clinical situations related to respiratory, cardiovascular and thromboembolic aspects of COVID-19, comparing well with other imaging modalities. The limitations due to insufficient data are highlighted as opportunities for future research.

Download Full-text

Expert Consensus on Clinical Application of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Results From a Modified Delphi Study

Global Spine Journal ◽

10.1177/21925682211012688 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 219256822110126

Author(s):

Yong Hai ◽

Jingwei Liu ◽

Yuzeng Liu ◽

Tie Liu ◽

Xinuo Zhang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Lumbar Spine ◽

Delphi Method ◽

Delphi Study ◽

Interbody Fusion ◽

Expert Consensus ◽

Lumbar Spine Surgery ◽

Study Group ◽

Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽

Modified Delphi ◽

Chinese Study

Study Design: Modified Delphi study. Objective: The objective of this study was to establish expert consensus on the application of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) by using the modified Delphi study. Methods: From June 2019 to March 2020, Members of the Chinese Study Group for Lateral Lumbar Spine Surgery were selected to collect expert feedback using the modified Delphi method where 65 spine surgeons from all over China agreed to participate. Four rounds were performed: 1 face-to-face meeting and 3 subsequent survey rounds. The consensus was achieved with ≥a 70.0% agreement for each question. The recommendation of grade A was defined as ≥90.0% of the agreement for each question. The recommendation of grade B was defined as 80.0-89.9% of the agreement for each question. The recommendation of grade C was defined as 70.0-79.9% of the agreement for each question. Results: A total of 65 experts formed a panelist group, and the number of questionnaires collected was 63, 59, and 62 in the 3 rounds. In total, 5 sections, 71 questions, and 382 items achieved consensus after the Delphi rounds including summary; preoperative evaluation; application at the lumbar spinal stenosis, lumbar disc herniation, lumbar spondylolisthesis, adult degenerative scoliosis, postoperative adjacent segmental degeneration, and revision surgery; complications; and postoperative follow-up evaluation of LLIF. Conclusion: The modified Delphi method was utilized to ascertain an expert consensus from the Chinese Study Group for Lateral Lumbar Spine Surgery to inform clinical decision-making in the application of LLIF. The salient grade A recommendations of the survey are enumerated.

Download Full-text

Development of an international standard set of patient-centred outcome measures for overall paediatric health: a consensus process

Archives of Disease in Childhood ◽

10.1136/archdischild-2020-320345 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. archdischild-2020-320345

Author(s):

Beatrix Algurén ◽

Jessily P Ramirez ◽

Matthew Salt ◽

Nick Sillett ◽

Stacie N Myers ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Outcome Measures ◽

Healthcare Delivery ◽

Well Being ◽

Delphi Process ◽

Global Perspective ◽

Modified Delphi ◽

Starting Point ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Standard Set ◽

Paediatric Health

ObjectiveTo develop an Overall Pediatric Health Standard Set (OPH-SS) of outcome measures that captures what matters to young people and their families and recognising the biopsychosocial aspects of health for all children and adolescents regardless of health condition.DesignA modified Delphi process.SettingThe International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement convened an international Working Group (WG) comprised of 23 international experts from 12 countries in the field of paediatrics, family medicine, psychometrics as well as patient advisors. The WG participated in 11 video-conferences, through a modified Delphi process and 9 surveys between March 2018 and January 2020 consensus was reached on a final recommended health outcome standard set. By a literature review conducted in March 2018, 1136 articles were screened for clinician and patient-reported or proxy-reported outcomes. Further, 4315 clinical trials and 12 paediatric health surveys were scanned. Between November 2019 and January 2020, the final standard set was endorsed by a patient validation (n=270) and a health professional (n=51) survey.ResultsFrom a total of 63 identified outcomes, consensus was formed on a standard set of outcome measures that comprises 10 patient-reported outcomes, 5 clinician-reported measures, and 6 case-mix variables. The four developmental age-specific packages (ie, 0–5, 6–12, 13–17, 18–24 years) include either five or six measures with an average time for completion of 20 min.ConclusionsThe OPH-SS is a starting point to drive value-based paediatric healthcare delivery from a global perspective for enhancing child and adolescent physical health and psychosocial well-being.

Download Full-text