Comparing trophic levels estimated from a tropical marine food web using an ecosystem model and stable isotopes

2020 ◽  
Vol 233 ◽  
pp. 106518
Author(s):  
Jianguo Du ◽  
Petrus Christianus Makatipu ◽  
Lily S.R. Tao ◽  
Daniel Pauly ◽  
William W.L. Cheung ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 163 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jannie Fries Linnebjerg ◽  
Keith A. Hobson ◽  
Jérôme Fort ◽  
Torkel Gissel Nielsen ◽  
Per Møller ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 158 (5) ◽  
pp. 1275-1280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Velando ◽  
Ignacio Munilla ◽  
Marta López-Alonso ◽  
Juan Freire ◽  
Cristobal Pérez

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin J. Flynn ◽  
Douglas C. Speirs ◽  
Michael R. Heath ◽  
Aditee Mitra

Projecting ocean biogeochemistry and fisheries resources under climate change requires confidence in simulation models. Core to such models is the description of consumer dynamics relating prey abundance to capture, digestion efficiency and growth rate. Capture is most commonly described as a linear function of prey encounter or by rectangular hyperbola. Most models also describe consumers as eating machines which “live-to-eat,” where growth (μ) is limited by a maximum grazing rate (Gmax). Real consumers can feed much faster than needed to support their maximum growth rate (μmax); with feeding modulated by satiation, they “eat-to-live.” A set of strategic analyses were conducted of these alternative philosophies of prey consumption dynamics and testing of their effects in the StrathE2E end-to-end marine food web and fisheries model. In an experiment where assimilation efficiencies were decreased by 10%, such as might result from a change in temperature or ocean acidity, the different formulation resulted in up to 100% variation in the change in abundances of food web components, especially in the mid-trophic levels. Our analysis points to a need for re-evaluation of some long-accepted principles in consumer-resource modeling.


2009 ◽  
Vol 157 (1) ◽  
pp. 157-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Aberle ◽  
Thomas Hansen ◽  
Ruth Boettger-Schnack ◽  
Antje Burmeister ◽  
Anton F. Post ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 173 ◽  
pp. 112929
Author(s):  
Alethea S. Madgett ◽  
Kyari Yates ◽  
Lynda Webster ◽  
Craig McKenzie ◽  
Colin F. Moffat

Oecologia ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 138 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rod M. Connolly ◽  
Michaela A. Guest ◽  
Andrew J. Melville ◽  
Joanne M. Oakes

2006 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
pp. 1259-1268 ◽  
Author(s):  
MORTEN FREDERIKSEN ◽  
MARTIN EDWARDS ◽  
ANTHONY J. RICHARDSON ◽  
NICHOLAS C. HALLIDAY ◽  
SARAH WANLESS

2020 ◽  
Vol 637 ◽  
pp. 225-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
MA Ladds ◽  
MH Pinkerton ◽  
E Jones ◽  
LM Durante ◽  
MR Dunn

Marine food webs are structured, in part, by predator gape size. Species found in deep-sea environments may have evolved such that they can consume prey of a wide range of sizes, to maximise resource intake in a low-productivity ecosystem. Estimates of gape size are central to some types of ecosystem model that determine which prey are available to predators, but cannot always be measured directly. Deep-sea species are hypothesized to have larger gape sizes than shallower-water species relative to their body size and, because of pronounced adaptive foraging behaviour, show only a weak relationship between gape size and trophic level. Here we present new data describing selective morphological measurements and gape sizes of 134 osteichthyan and chondrichthyan species from the deep sea (200-1300 m) off New Zealand. We describe how gape size (height, width and area) varied with factors including fish size, taxonomy (class and order within a class) and trophic level estimated from stable isotopes. For deep-sea species, there was a strong relationship between gape size and fish size, better predicted by body mass than total length, which varied by taxonomic group. Results show that predictions of gape size can be made from commonly measured morphological variables. No relationship between gape size and trophic level was found, likely a reflection of using trophic level estimates from stable isotopes as opposed to the commonly used estimates from FishBase. These results support the hypothesis that deep-sea fish are generalists within their environment, including suspected scavenging, even at the highest trophic levels.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document