Mechanism of action of the disease-modifying anti-arthritic thiol agents d-penicillamine and sodium aurothiomalate: Restoration of cellular free thiols and sequestration of reactive aldehydes

2008 ◽  
Vol 580 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 48-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul L. Wood ◽  
M. Amin Khan ◽  
Joseph R. Moskal
2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 213.3-214
Author(s):  
M. Y. Hachim ◽  
S. Hannawi

Background:Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused by SARS-COV2 represents an unprecedented global public health concern with a particular burden on patients with chronic diseases and those on immune-modulating drugs. It is especially worrisome to patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are on immune suppression regimens[1]. On the other side, many reports showed and recommended the use of some Disease-Modifying Drugs commonly used to treat rheumatic diseases like hydroxychloroquine. However, the general understanding of COVID-19 characteristics in this population and the mechanism of action of these drugs in COVID-19 is still unknown[2].Objectives:Explore publicly available transcriptomic dataset of patients infected with SARS-COV2 compared to uninfected to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to the immune system that might be pathogenic in RA synovium. Then explore the effect of Disease-Modifying Drugs on their local expression that might give hints about their possible mechanism of action.Methods:RNAseq dataset (GSE147507) were retrieved using the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and used to identify DEGs between infected and uninfected lung samples using BioJupies tools [3]. The DEGs were explored for common pathways using Metascape online tool (http://metascape.org) [10], as shown in figure (1). The chemokines genes were filtered out, and their common receptor (CR) was identified. The immune cells that express a higher level of the identified receptor were explored using DICE project tool (https://dice-database.org/). The expression of CR was searched in a microarray dataset (GSE77298) of synovial biopsies of RA and healthy controls. RNAseq dataset (GSE97165) of synovial biopsies taken from 19 early RA patients at baseline and after six months of Triple Disease-Modifying Anti-rheumatic drugs (tDMARD; methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and hydroxychloroquine) treatment.Results:84 DEGs were identified between uninfected and COVID-19 infected lung samples. These DEGs were enriched in pathways specific to (response to the virus, response to interferon, leukocyte activation, and chemotaxis). Interestingly, SARS-COV-2 infected lungs express more CCL4, CCL8, and CCL11; the three ligands shared the same receptor, which is CCR5. Top immune cells that express CCR5 were CD4 T memory T reg cells, Th17, Th1, and monocytes. CCR5 was significantly upregulated in RA compared to healthy controls synovium (p=0.04) and was dramatically downregulated after six months of tDMARD treatment (p=0.004), as shown in figure (2).Conclusion:Using publicly available transcriptomic datasets properly highlighted the possible beneficiary effect of DMARDs in patients with COVID-19, which can block CCR5 rich immune cells recruitment.References:[1]Favalli, E.G., et al.,COVID-19 infection and rheumatoid arthritis: Faraway, so close!Autoimmun Rev, 2020. 19(5): p. 102523.[2]Gianfrancesco, M.A., et al.,Rheumatic disease and COVID-19: initial data from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance provider registries.The Lancet Rheumatology, 2020. 2(5): p. e250-e253.[3]Torre, D., A. Lachmann, and A. Ma’ayan,BioJupies: Automated Generation of Interactive Notebooks for RNA-Seq Data Analysis in the Cloud.Cell Systems, 2018. 7(5): p. 556-561.e3.Figure 1.Flowchart of transcriptomic analysisFigure 2.(A) Top immune cells that express CCR5 (B) CCR5 expression in synovial biopsies of RA and control (C) CCR5 expression at baseline and after 6 months of tDMARD treatment.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Author(s):  
Joanna Ledingham ◽  
Sarah Westlake

A variety of immunosuppressants and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) with beneficial effects on inflammatory rheumatic diseases have been identified over the last 50 years. Their use for these conditions is now well established and has led to considerable improvements in disease management. Their use earlier in the inflammatory disease process and the use of combination therapies have also led to significantly improved patient outcomes. This chapter provides an overview of the immunosuppressants and DMARDs used to treat rheumatic disease, focusing particularly on those in common use and with the best evidence for efficacy. The mechanism of action, toxicity, and clinical indications are outlined. Tips for practical prescribing and for monitoring for potential complications are also included.


2013 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aristoteles Giagounidis ◽  
Ghulam J. Mufti ◽  
Pierre Fenaux ◽  
Ulrich Germing ◽  
Alan List ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-131
Author(s):  
Koichiro Ishikawa ◽  
Junichiro Ishikawa

Objective: To elucidate the radiographic outcomes for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients using the synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (sDMARD) Iguratimod (IGU) and other DMARDs including injectable sodium aurothiomalate, bucillamine, salazosulphapyridine, infliximab, etanercept, tocilizumab and/or abatacept.Patients and Methods: 213 patients were enrolled in this study. Total Genant-modified Sharp scores (GSS) of hands/wrists and feet at baseline and at week 104 were calculated in 31 RA patients treated with a daily dose of 25 mg or 50 mg for 104 weeks.Results: Total GSS of 31 patients at week 104 showed no progression (total GSS  <= 0.84: the smallest detectable change) in 16 (52%) patients with a mean score reduction (95% CI) of-4.3 (-8.1 ~ -0.5) (p < 0.05).Conclusion: Treatment with the sDMARD, IGU showed no radiographic progression in 16 (52%) RA patients at week 104. Concerning the suppression mechanism of joint destruction by IGU and other DMARDs, we speculate that DMARDs prevent bone/cartilage destruction by inhibiting the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF- kB) lig and (RANKL) and through other antirheumatic actions.


Author(s):  
Joanna Ledingham ◽  
Sarah Westlake

A variety of immunosuppressants and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) with beneficial effects on inflammatory rheumatic diseases have been identified over the last 50 years. Their use for these conditions is now well established and has led to considerable improvements in disease management. Their use earlier in the inflammatory disease process and the use of combination therapies have also led to significantly improved patient outcomes. This chapter provides an overview of the immunosuppressants and DMARDs used to treat rheumatic disease, focusing particularly on those in common use and with the best evidence for efficacy. The mechanism of action, toxicity, and clinical indications are outlined. Tips for practical prescribing and for monitoring for potential complications are also included.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 43-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Mascarenhas ◽  
Claire Harrison ◽  
Katarina Luptakova ◽  
Jessica Christo ◽  
Jing Wang ◽  
...  

The bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) family of proteins bind to chromatin to regulate the transcription of target genes involved in multiple pro-fibrotic pathways and is a novel therapeutic target for reducing fibrosis in myelofibrosis (MF). CPI-0610 is a unique, first-in-class, oral, small-molecule inhibitor of BET (BETi) proteins, designed to promote disease-modifying activity through selective gene regulation of key oncogenic, fibrotic, and inflammatory factors with potential to transform the standard of care in MF. Products with only one mechanism of action are approved currently for treatment of MF, Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitors (JAKi), with ruxolitinib (rux) being the standard of care for treatment-naïve MF patients. A minority of MF patients treated with rux (35%; 106 of 301) or fedratinib (37%; 35 of 96) achieved a spleen volume reduction ≥ 35% (SVR35) at 6-12 months. Disease-modifying therapeutic agents with a novel mechanism of action are needed to improve the outcomes in MF pts. Blocking BET activity with CPI-0610 inhibited aberrant maturation of megakaryocytes and decreased cytokine production in preclinical studies. In addition, synergistic antitumor activity of BETi and JAKi combination was observed in preclinical MF models. Clinical activity of CPI-0610 in combination with rux in JAKi-naïve MF patients observed in the phase 2 MANIFEST study was higher (SVR35 at wk 24: 63%) than that observed with rux alone in historical Phase 3 trials (Mascarenhas, EHA 2020). MANIFEST-2 is a global, phase 3, 1:1 randomized, double-blind, active-control study of CPI-0610 + rux vs. placebo + rux in JAKi treatment-naïve patients with primary MF, post-polycythemia-vera MF, or post-essential-thrombocythemia MF. Key eligibility criteria: DIPSS score ≥Int-1; platelet ≥100 x 109/L; spleen volume ≥ 450 cc by CT/MRI; ≥2 symptoms measurable (score ≥3) or a total symptom score (TSS) of ≥10 using the MFSAF v4.0; peripheral blast count &lt;5%, ECOG ≤2. Approximately 310 patients (155 in each arm) will be enrolled in the study. Patient randomization will be stratified by DIPSS risk category (Intermediate-1 vs. Intermediate-2 vs. High), platelet count (&gt; 200 × 109/L vs. 100 - 200 × 109/L), and spleen volume (≥ 1800 cm3 vs. &lt; 1800 cm3). Double-blind treatment (CPI-0610 or matching placebo) will be administered once daily (QD) for 14 consecutive days followed by a 7-day break, which is considered 1 cycle of treatment (1 cycle = 21 days). Rux will be administered twice daily (BID) for all 21 days within each cycle. Primary endpoint: SVR35 response (≥35% reduction in spleen volume) at wk 24; key secondary endpoint: TSS50 response (≥50% reduction in TSS) at wk 24; other secondary endpoints: safety, PK, PD, bone marrow morphology/fibrosis, duration of SVR35 response, duration of TSS50 response, PFS, OS, conversion from transfusion dependence to independence, rate of RBC transfusion for the first 24 wks, hemoglobin response, peripheral proinflammatory cytokines. Figure Disclosures Mascarenhas: Incyte, Kartos, Roche, Promedior, Merck, Merus, Arog, CTI Biopharma, Janssen, and PharmaEssentia: Other: Research funding (institution); Celgene, Prelude, Galecto, Promedior, Geron, Constellation, and Incyte: Consultancy. Harrison:Roche: Honoraria; Sierra Oncology: Honoraria; Promedior: Honoraria; AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte Corporation: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CTI Biopharma Corp: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Luptakova:Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Christo:Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Wang:Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Mertz:Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Colak:Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Shao:Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bobba:Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Trojer:Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Senderowicz:Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months; Puma Biotechnology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Humphrey:Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Verstovsek:Gilead: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; PharmaEssentia: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; ItalPharma: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma Corp: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corp: Research Funding; Protagonist Therapeutics: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document