scholarly journals Assessment of stereotactic radiosurgery treatment response for brain metastases using MRI based diffusion index

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 84-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zengai Chen ◽  
Jinyan Zu ◽  
Lei li ◽  
Xiaojie Lu ◽  
Jianming Ni ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_4) ◽  
pp. iv22-iv23
Author(s):  
Markand Patel ◽  
Dilina Rajapakse ◽  
Jian Ping Jen ◽  
Sara Meade ◽  
Helen Benghiat ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), brain metastases can increase in size in up to a third of cases. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a limited role to distinguish between tumour recurrence and SRS-induced changes, which can impact patient management. Delayed contrast MRI treatment response assessment maps (TRAM) use the principle of contrast clearance seen in other tumours, where high vascularity shows a rapid rise in contrast as well as rapid clearance, whereas areas of damaged or low vascularity show accumulation of contrast. We aimed to assess the ability of delayed contrast MRI and multiparametric MRI techniques of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) and MR spectroscopy (MRS) to distinguish between radiation-related effects and tumour tissue, as these techniques assess tissue physiological and metabolic information. Method A retrospective review was performed on 23 patients who had delayed contrast and multiparametric MRI between October 2018 to April 2020. Studies were restricted to cases with brain metastases enlarging post-SRS with uncertainty at the MDT meeting regarding progression or treatment-related change, impacting the patient’s management. MRI was performed at 3T including DWI, PWI, MRS with short and intermediate echo times, and 3D T1 MPRAGE at 3-5, 20-30 and 70-90 minutes after administration of intravenous contrast. Contrast clearance analysis was performed by selecting an enhancing region of interest (ROI), measuring signal intensities at the three different timepoints and taking apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) values from the ROI. Choline/Creatine values were calculated from a single-voxel (10 mm isotropic) encompassing the entire contrast-enhancing lesion. Outcome was established from MRI follow-up at 6 months, with a stable or responding lesion considered treatment-related changes and increase considered progression. Results Across 23 patients, 24 metastases were assessed. Two patients were excluded as appropriate follow-up was not available. Sites of primary tumours included breast (n=8), lung (n=6), melanoma (n=4), neuroendocrine tumour from the lung (n=2) and renal cell carcinoma (n=2). Mean age was 56 years and 50% were female. In this cohort, 59% (n=13) were classified as having radiation-related changes on follow-up. Delayed MRI contrast clearance between the 3-5 and 70-90 minute imaging was significantly higher in cases of progression (23.6% vs. 2.5% decrease, p<0.05), as were the rCBV and Cho/Cr ratio (rCBV 3.1 vs. 1.5 and Cho/Cr ratio 2.3 vs. 1.4, p<0.05). Accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of using TRAM alone (contrast clearance decrease of >0%) for progression was 63%/100%/38%, PWI alone (rCBV cut-off 2.0) yielded results of 77%/75%/79% and for both Cho/Cr ratio alone (cut-off 1.8) and combined with TRAM, it was 90%/88%/92%. Neuroradiologist assessment of all techniques was 95%/100%/92%. Conclusion This study shows the effectiveness of delayed contrast and multiparametric MRI for treatment response assessment in patients with brain metastases treated by SRS in clinical practice. Although a delayed contrast MRI study is a very sensitive tool for detecting tumour progression, it lacks specificity. The accuracy of differentiating between tumour and treatment-related effects increases when delayed contrast MRI is used in combination with other advanced techniques such as MRS. By combining all these techniques, neuroradiologists had the highest accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for detecting progression in post-SRS brain metastases.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i8-i9
Author(s):  
Jiayi Huang ◽  
Yuan Rao ◽  
Mikhail Milchenko ◽  
Pamela LaMontagne ◽  
Christopher Abraham ◽  
...  

Abstract PURPOSE: To determine if dynamic susceptibility-weighted perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (DSC-PMR) can be used to predict local recurrence (LR) of brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS: This is a prospective observational study of adult brain metastasis patients treated with single-fraction SRS, who were imaged with DSC-PMRs before SRS and after 1 week. DSC-PMRs were performed with tracer method in which injection of gadolinium was followed by repeated T2*-weighted gradient echo-planar image acquisition. Regions of interests (ROIs) were generated based on the T1-enhancing tumors irradiated. Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) parameter maps were calculated by dividing the top 5% of CBV or CBF values within a ROI by the contralateral normal thalamus. LR was determined according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria. Cox regression was conducted to identify factors associated with time to LR. LR rates were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were enrolled from 2013 through 2016, with 24 evaluable lesions from 17 patients. After a median follow-up of 12.8 months (range: 3.0–53.7), 5 lesions (21%) developed LR after a median of 3.4 months (range: 2.3–5.7). On univariable analysis, higher rCBV at week 1 (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01–1.11, p=0.02), lower SRS dose (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.20–0.91, p=0.03), and larger tumor volume (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.05–2.20, p=0.03) were significantly associated with LR, but not histology, rCBV at baseline, change of rCBV at week 1 from baseline, or any rCBF parameters. Higher rCBV at week 1 (above the median) was associated with significantly higher risk of LR than lower rCBV (44% vs 0% at 1 year, respectively, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: DSC-PMR and specifically rCBV at week 1 may be a promising imaging biomarker to predict treatment response of brain metastasis after SRS and warrant further investigation.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3458
Author(s):  
Anna Petoukhova ◽  
Roland Snijder ◽  
Rudolf Wiggenraad ◽  
Linda de Boer-de Wit ◽  
Ivonne Mudde-van der Wouden ◽  
...  

The purpose was to compare linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery and hypofractionated radiotherapy plan quality of automated planning, intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and manual dynamic conformal arc (DCA) plans as well as single- and multiple-isocenter techniques for multiple brain metastases (BM). For twelve patients with four to ten BM, seven non-coplanar linac-based plans were created: a manually planned DCA plan with a separate isocenter for each metastasis, a single-isocenter dynamic IMRT plan, an automatically generated single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) plan, four automatically generated single-isocenter DCA plans with three or five couch angles, with high or low sparing of normal tissue. Paddick conformity index, gradient index (GI), mean dose, total V12Gy and V5Gy of uninvolved brain, number of monitor units (MUs), irradiation time and pass rate were compared. The GI was significantly higher for VMAT than for separate-isocenter, IMRT, and all automatically generated plans. The number of MUs was lowest for VMAT, followed by automatically generated DCA and IMRT plans and highest for manual DCA plans. Irradiation time was the shortest for automatically planned DCA plans. Automatically generated linac-based single-isocenter plans for multiple BM reduce the number of MUs and irradiation time with at least comparable GI and V5Gy relative to the reference separate-isocenter DCA plans.


Author(s):  
Ankita Gupta ◽  
Budhi Singh Yadav ◽  
Nagarjun Ballari ◽  
Namrata Das ◽  
Ngangom Robert

Abstract Background: Brain metastases (BM) are common in patients with HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer. In this study we aim to report clinical outcomes with LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) for BM in patients of breast cancer. Methods: Clinical and dosimetric records of breast cancer patients treated for BM at our institute between May, 2015 and December, 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients of previously treated or newly diagnosed breast cancer with at least a radiological diagnosis of BM; 1–4 in number, ≤3·5 cm in maximum dimension, with a Karnofsky Performance Score of ≥60 were taken up for treatment with SRS. SRT was generally considered if a tumour was >3·5 cm in diameter, near a critical or eloquent structure, or if the proximity of moderately sized tumours would lead to dose bridging in a single-fraction SRS plan. The median prescribed SRS dose was 15 Gy (range 7–24 Gy) and SRT dose was 27 Gy in 3 fractions. Clinical assessment and MR imaging was done at 6 weeks post-SRS and then every 3 months thereafter. Intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan–Meier method and subgroups were compared using log rank test. Results: Total, 40 tumours were treated in 31 patients. The median tumour diameter was 2·3 cm (range 1·0–4·6 cm). SRS and SRT were delivered in 27 and 4 patients, respectively. SRS/SRT was given as a boost to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in four patients and as salvage for progression after WBRT in six patients. In general, nine patients underwent prior surgery. The median follow-up was 7·9 months (0·2–34 months). Twenty (64·5%) patients developed local recurrence, 10 (32·3%) patients developed distant intracranial relapse and 7 patients had both local and distant intracranial relapse. The estimated local control at 6 months and 1 year was 48 and 35%, respectively. Median intracranial progression free survival (PFS) was 3·73 months (range 0·2–25 months). Median intracranial PFS was 3·02 months in patients who received SRS alone or as boost after WBRT, while it was 4·27 months in those who received SRS as salvage after WBRT (p = 0·793). No difference in intracranial PFS was observed with or without prior surgery (p = 0·410). Median overall survival (OS) was 21·7 months (range 0·2–34 months) for the entire cohort. Patients who received prior WBRT had a poor OS (13·31 months) as compared to SRS alone (21·4 months; p = 0·699). Conclusion: In patients with BM after breast cancer SRS alone, WBRT + SRS and surgery + SRS had comparable PFS and OS.


Author(s):  
Sergej Telentschak ◽  
Daniel Ruess ◽  
Stefan Grau ◽  
Roland Goldbrunner ◽  
Niklas von Spreckelsen ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose The introduction of hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (hSRS) extended the treatment modalities beyond the well-established single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated radiotherapy. Here, we report the efficacy and side effects of hSRS using Cyberknife® (CK-hSRS) for the treatment of patients with critical brain metastases (BM) and a very poor prognosis. We discuss our experience in light of current literature. Methods All patients who underwent CK-hSRS over 3 years were retrospectively included. We applied a surface dose of 27 Gy in 3 fractions. Rates of local control (LC), systemic progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan–Meier method. Treatment-related complications were rated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Results We analyzed 34 patients with 75 BM. 53% of the patients had a large tumor, tumor location was eloquent in 32%, and deep seated in 15%. 36% of tumors were recurrent after previous irradiation. The median Karnofsky Performance Status was 65%. The actuarial rates of LC at 3, 6, and 12 months were 98%, 98%, and 78.6%, respectively. Three, 6, and 12 months PFS was 38%, 32%, and 15%, and OS was 65%, 47%, and 28%, respectively. Median OS was significantly associated with higher KPS, which was the only significant factor for survival. Complications CTCAE grade 1–3 were observed in 12%. Conclusion Our radiation schedule showed a reasonable treatment effectiveness and tolerance. Representing an optimal salvage treatment for critical BM in patients with a very poor prognosis and clinical performance state, CK-hSRS may close the gap between surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, conventional radiotherapy, and palliative care.


Author(s):  
Allison N Palmiero ◽  
Denise Fabian ◽  
William St Clair ◽  
Marcus Randall ◽  
Damodar Pokhrel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document