Fragility assessment and optimum design of a steel–concrete frame structure with hybrid energy-dissipated devices under multi-hazards of earthquake and wind

2021 ◽  
Vol 245 ◽  
pp. 112878
Author(s):  
Chao Li ◽  
Yang Liu ◽  
Hong-Nan Li
Keyword(s):  
Optimum Design ◽  
Frame Structure ◽  
Hybrid Energy ◽  
Concrete Frame ◽  
Energy Dissipated

scholarly journals Strength and deformation of bending normal sections made of concrete frame structure

2021 ◽  
Vol 1083 (1) ◽  
pp. 012034
Author(s):  
D R Mailyan ◽  
G V Nesvetaev ◽  
Yu I Koryanova ◽  
E V Lesniak
Keyword(s):  
Frame Structure ◽  
Concrete Frame ◽  
Strength And Deformation

Influences of Tunnel Excavation Blasting Vibration on Surface High-Rise Building

2010 ◽  
Vol 163-167 ◽  
pp. 2613-2617
Author(s):  
Hai Liang Wang ◽  
Tong Wei Gao
Keyword(s):  
Vibration Frequency ◽  
Vertical Vibration ◽  
Frame Structure ◽  
Vibration Monitoring ◽  
Vibration Velocity ◽  
Blasting Vibration ◽  
Road Tunnel ◽  
Concrete Frame ◽  
High Rise ◽  
Order Of Magnitude

According to the 33 floors high building, blasting vibration monitoring had been carried on. The building, along Yunnan road tunnel of Qingdao Cross-harbor Tunnel Guide Line Project, has concrete frame structure. Monitoring data had been analyzed. Results showed that rules of vertical vibration velocity and main vibration frequency have similar relevance. Amplification effect of them was existed on the middle and top of the building. From the 2nd floor of downward ground to ground, the value of them suddenly decreased. Main vibration frequency is in the range of 101~102 order of magnitude.

Acoustic Emission Testing of Concrete Frame during Pseudo Dynamic Loading

2006 ◽  
Vol 13-14 ◽  
pp. 195-200
Author(s):  
Athanasios Anastasopoulus ◽  
S. Bousias ◽  
A. Tsimogiannis ◽  
T. Toutountzakis
Keyword(s):  
Acoustic Emission ◽  
Dynamic Testing ◽  
Frame Structure ◽  
Scale Model ◽  
Reinforced Concrete Frame ◽  
Energy Rate ◽  
Concrete Frame ◽  
Emission Testing ◽  
Real Size ◽  
Acoustic Emission Testing

Acoustic Emission (AE) monitoring was performed during Pseudo-Dynamic Testing of a torsionally unbalanced, two-storey, one-by-one bay reinforced concrete frame structure. The structure represented a 0.7-scale model of a real-size frame structure designed and detailed according to the standards prevailing in Greece in 60's, without engineered earthquake resistance. Real time monitoring of AE activity versus the complex applied load resulted in semi quantitative damage characterization as well as comparative evaluation of the damage evolution of the different size columns. Evolution of the AE energy rate per channel, as revealed from zonal location, and the energy rate of linearly located sources enabled the identification of damage areas and the forecast of crack locations before cracks were visible with naked eye. In addition to that, the results of post processing evaluation allowed for the verification of the witnessed damaged areas and formed the basis for quantitative assessment of damage criticality.

scholarly journals Experimental Study of a New Precast Prestressed Concrete Joint

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1871 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xueyuan Yan ◽  
Suguo Wang ◽  
Canling Huang ◽  
Ai Qi ◽  
Chao Hong
Keyword(s):  
Energy Dissipation ◽  
Seismic Performance ◽  
Prestressed Concrete ◽  
Precast Concrete ◽  
Concrete Strength ◽  
Frame Structure ◽  
Loading Test ◽  
Concrete Frame ◽  
Concrete Joints ◽  
Precast Prestressed Concrete

Precast monolithic structures are increasingly applied in construction. Such a structure has a performance somewhere between that of a pure precast structure and that of a cast-in-place structure. A precast concrete frame structure is one of the most common prefabricated structural systems. The post-pouring joint is important for controlling the seismic performance of the entire precast monolithic frame structure. This paper investigated the joints of a precast prestressed concrete frame structure. A reversed cyclic loading test was carried out on two precast prestressed concrete beam–column joints that were fabricated with two different concrete strengths in the keyway area. This testing was also performed on a cast-in-place reinforced concrete joint for comparison. The phenomena such as joint crack development, yielding, and ultimate damage were observed, and the seismic performance of the proposed precast prestressed concrete joint was determined. The results showed that the precast prestressed concrete joint and the cast-in-place joint had a similar failure mode. The stiffness, bearing capacity, ductility, and energy dissipation were comparable. The hysteresis curves were full and showed that the joints had good energy dissipation. The presence of prestressing tendons limited the development of cracks in the precast beams. The concrete strength of the keyway area had little effect on the seismic performance of the precast prestressed concrete joints. The precast prestressed concrete joints had a seismic performance that was comparable to the equivalent monolithic system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document