How does the Alexander Technique lead to psychological and non-physical outcomes? A realist review

IntroductionAugmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) are increasingly used to upskill health and care providers, including in surgical, nursing and acute care settings. Many studies have used AR/VR to deliver training, providing mixed evidence on their effectiveness and limited evidence regarding contextual factors that influence effectiveness and implementation. This review will develop, test and refine an evidence-informed programme theory on what facilitates or constrains the implementation of AR or VR programmes in health and care settings and understand how, for whom and to what extent they ‘work’.Methods and analysisThis realist review adheres to the Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) standards and will be conducted in three steps: theory elicitation, theory testing and theory refinement. First, a search will identify practitioner, academic and learning and technology adoption theories from databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, Embase, Education Resources Information Center, PsycINFO and Web of Science), practitioner journals, snowballing and grey literature. Information regarding contexts, mechanisms and outcomes will be extracted. A narrative synthesis will determine overlapping configurations and form an initial theory. Second, the theory will be tested using empirical evidence located from the above databases and identified from the first search. Quality will be assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), and relevant information will be extracted into a coding sheet. Third, the extracted information will be compared with the initial programme theory, with differences helping to make refinements. Findings will be presented as a narrative summary, and the MMAT will determine our confidence in each configuration.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is not required. This review will develop an evidence-informed programme theory. The results will inform and support AR/VR interventions from clinical educators, healthcare providers and software developers. Upskilling through AR/VR learning interventions may improve quality of care and promote evidence-based practice and continued learning. Findings will be disseminated through conference presentations and peer-reviewed journal articles.

Download Full-text

Contexts and mechanisms that promote access to healthcare for populations experiencing homelessness: a realist review

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043091 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (4) ◽

pp. e043091

Author(s):

Rikke Siersbaek ◽

John Alexander Ford ◽

Sara Burke ◽

Clíona Ní Cheallaigh ◽

Steve Thomas

Keyword(s):

Health System ◽

Healthcare Access ◽

Grey Literature ◽

Realist Review ◽

Access To Healthcare ◽

Staff Retention ◽

Programme Theory ◽

Eligibility Criteria ◽

Ovid Medline ◽

High Level

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to identify and understand the health system contexts and mechanisms that allow for homeless populations to access appropriate healthcare when needed.DesignA realist review.Data sourcesOvid MEDLINE, embase.com, CINAHL, ASSIA and grey literature until April 2019.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesThe purpose of the review was to identify health system patterns which enable access to healthcare for people who experience homelessness. Peer-reviewed articles were identified through a systematic search, grey literature search, citation tracking and expert recommendations. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were assessed for rigour and relevance and coded to identify data relating to contexts, mechanisms and/or outcomes.AnalysisInductive and deductive coding was used to generate context–mechanism–outcome configurations, which were refined and then used to build several iterations of the overarching programme theory.ResultsSystematic searching identified 330 review articles, of which 24 were included. An additional 11 grey literature and primary sources were identified through citation tracking and expert recommendation. Additional purposive searching of grey literature yielded 50 records, of which 12 were included, for a total of 47 included sources. The analysis found that healthcare access for populations experiencing homelessness is improved when services are coordinated and delivered in a way that is organised around the person with a high degree of flexibility and a culture that rejects stigma, generating trusting relationships between patients and staff/practitioners. Health systems should provide long-term, dependable funding for services to ensure sustainability and staff retention.ConclusionsWith homelessness on the rise internationally, healthcare systems should focus on high-level factors such as funding stability, building inclusive cultures and setting goals which encourage and support staff to provide flexible, timely and connected services to improve access.

Download Full-text

Voluntary agreements to protect private forests – A realist review

Forest Policy and Economics ◽

10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102457 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 128 ◽

pp. 102457

Author(s):

Matilda Miljand ◽

Therese Bjärstig ◽

Katarina Eckerberg ◽

Eeva Primmer ◽

Camilla Sandström

Keyword(s):

Realist Review ◽

Voluntary Agreements ◽

Private Forests

Download Full-text

Correction to: Community mobilisation approaches to preventing and reducing adolescent multiple risk behaviour: a realist review protocol

Systematic Reviews ◽

10.1186/s13643-021-01720-7 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Laura Tinner ◽

Deborah Caldwell ◽

Rona Campbell

Keyword(s):

Realist Review ◽

Risk Behaviour ◽

Community Mobilisation ◽

Review Protocol ◽

Multiple Risk ◽

Multiple Risk Behaviour

Download Full-text

Conversations about FGM in primary care: a realist review on how, why and under what circumstances FGM is discussed in general practice consultations

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039809 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (3) ◽

pp. e039809

Author(s):

Sharon Dixon ◽

Claire Duddy ◽

Gabrielle Harrison ◽

Chrysanthi Papoutsi ◽

Sue Ziebland ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Primary Care ◽

Grey Literature ◽

Relevant Literature ◽

Theory Development ◽

Realist Review ◽

Primary Outcome Measure ◽

Mandatory Reporting ◽

Programme Theory ◽

Genital Mutilation ◽

The Impact

ObjectivesLittle is known about the management of female genital mutilation (FGM) in primary care. There have been significant recent statutory changes relevant to general practitioners (GPs) in England, including a mandatory reporting duty. We undertook a realist synthesis to explore what influences how and when GPs discuss FGM with their patients.SettingPrimary care in England.Data sourcesRealist literature synthesis searching 10 databases with terms: GPs, primary care, obstetrics, gynaecology, midwifery and FGM (UK and worldwide). Citation chasing was used, and relevant grey literature was included, including searching FGM advocacy organisation websites for relevant data. Other potentially relevant literature fields were searched for evidence to inform programme theory development. We included all study designs and papers that presented evidence about factors potentially relevant to considering how, why and in what circumstances GPs feel able to discuss FGM with their patients.Primary outcome measureThis realist review developed programme theory, tested against existing evidence, on what influences GPs actions and reactions to FGM in primary care consultations and where, when and why these influences are activated.Results124 documents were included in the synthesis. Our analysis found that GPs need knowledge and training to help them support their patients with FGM, including who may be affected, what needs they may have and how to talk sensitively about FGM. Access to specialist services and guidance may help them with this role. Reporting requirements may complicate these conversations.ConclusionsThere is a pressing need to develop (and evaluate) training to help GPs meet FGM-affected communities’ health needs and to promote the accessibility of primary care. Education and resources should be developed in partnership with community members. The impact of the mandatory reporting requirement and the Enhanced Dataset on healthcare interactions in primary care warrants evaluation.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018091996.

Download Full-text

Alexander Technique vs. Targeted Exercise for Neck Pain—A Preliminary Comparison

Applied Sciences ◽

10.3390/app11104640 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (10) ◽

pp. 4640

Author(s):

Jordan J. Becker ◽

Tara L. McIsaac ◽

Shawn L. Copeland ◽

Rajal G. Cohen

Keyword(s):

Neck Pain ◽

Video Game ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Chronic Neck Pain ◽

Exercise Group ◽

Alexander Technique ◽

Private Lessons ◽

Pain Disability ◽

Exercise Class

Background: Alexander technique private lessons have been shown to reduce chronic neck pain and are thought to work by different mechanisms than exercise. Group classes may also be effective and would be cost-effective. Design: A two-group pre-test/post-test design. Participants were assigned to either a general Alexander technique class or an exercise class designed to target neck pain. Both groups met over 5 weeks for two 60 min sessions/week. Participants: A total of 16 participants with chronic neck pain (aged 50+/−16 years) completed this study. Interventions: The Alexander class used awareness-building methods to teach participants to reduce habitual tension during everyday activities. The exercise class was based on physical therapy standard of care to strengthen neck and back muscles thought to be important for posture. Measures: We assessed neck pain/disability, pain self-efficacy, activation of the sternocleidomastoid muscles during the cranio-cervical flexion test, and posture while participants played a video game. Results: Both groups reported decreased neck pain/disability after the interventions. Sternocleidomastoid activation decreased only in the Alexander group. Conclusion: In this small preliminary study, Alexander classes were at least as effective as exercise classes in reducing neck pain and seemed to work via a different mechanism. Larger, multi-site studies are justified.

Download Full-text

Rapid Realist Review of School-Based Physical Activity Interventions in 7- to 11-Year-Old Children

Children ◽

10.3390/children8010052 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (1) ◽

pp. 52

Author(s):

Emmanuel Defever ◽

Michelle Jones

Keyword(s):

Physical Activity ◽

School Leadership ◽

School Environment ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Implementation Fidelity ◽

Realist Review ◽

School Level ◽

School Settings ◽

Physical Activity Interventions ◽

Rapid Realist Review

Meta-analysis of physical activity interventions in school settings have revealed low efficacy and that there is a need to explore implementation fidelity. The aim of this rapid realist review was to determine, what physical activity interventions in school settings for children aged 7- to 11-years-old works, for whom, and in what circumstances. The realist synthesis was conducted following RAMESES guidelines. Relevant studies were identified following a systematic search process and data from 28 studies was extracted for evidence to form context-mechanism-outcome configurations that were clustered and refined. Using the five-level socioecological model, the program theories were classified into the levels of intrapersonal (child), interpersonal (teachers), institutional (program content, school administration, and school environment), community (home and neighborhood), and policy. The school level led to most context-mechanism-outcome configurations related to school leadership and policy, workforce structure, program characteristics, and school environment. At each level, we identified features of interventions, alongside implementation considerations that might work to promote efficacy and sustainability. The need to recognize the school environment as part of a complex system with multi-level interaction and influences was a key finding. In line with realist philosophy, the researchers encouraged primary research to confirm, refute, and refine the program theories presented.

Download Full-text