scholarly journals The success rate of intrauterine insemination after failed oocyte retrieval

2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (3) ◽  
pp. e324
Author(s):  
M. Irani ◽  
V. Gunnala ◽  
I. Kligman ◽  
Z. Rosenwaks
2012 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 301-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Jasovic ◽  
Emilija Jasovic-Siveska

Background/Aim. Unknown cause of infertility exists in 10%-26% of couples with infertility problems. Treatment of these couples depends on the possibility of correcting the unidentified defect over time. Intrauterine insemination (IUI) and ovaluation stimulation are methods of choice in treatment of unexplained fertility, but if a woman is older than 37 years, in vitro fertilization (IVF) could be directly recommended. The aim of this research was to compare the success rate of pregnancies with IUI between the patients with unexplained infertility and the patients with mild form endometriosis. Methods. The study included on 50 patients diagnosed with mild form endometriosis (group A) and 50 patients with unknown cause infertility (group B). Using the same therapeutical protocol, human menopausal gonadothropin (hMG) stimulation and horionic gonadropin (hCG) induction were applied, as well as IUI. Results. The percentage of achieved ovulation was higher in the group B (p < 0.05). During the 3 simulated sequential periods 102 IUI were performed in the group A and 97 IUI in the group B. In the group A there were 6 single and 1 twin pregnancies sucesfully conceived (14%), while in group B there were 9 (18%) single pregnancies. Conclusion. The use of a combination of controled ovarian hyperstimulation and IUI is an effective, cheap and safe method for treating infertility couples, especially couples with unknown cause infertility. Mild form endometriosis, as etiological infertility factor, has a negative impact on IUI success rate.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-45
Author(s):  
Mafruha Khanam ◽  
Rokeya Begum ◽  
Aditi Banerjee ◽  
Jesmin Jerin ◽  
Mohamed Mazih Fazyl ◽  
...  

Background: Intrauterine Insemination (IUI) is one of the most common assisted reproductive technology methods in the world to treat various forms of infertility. The influence of number of IUI applied with the percentage of motile spermatozoa during insemination is critical on the likelihood of a successful pregnancy. The aim of our study is to assess the results of IUI as a function of the number of IUI applied with motile spermatozoa inseminated during intrauterine insemination in couples with infertility. Materials and methods: This is a prospective study conducted in Surgiscope Fertility Centre, Chattogram, Bangladesh over 21 months on 596 couples who underwent IUI from 01/12/2017 to 30/09/2019. We performed semen analysis of the male partner from the couples who underwent IUI, calculated the sperm motility and the relationship between number of IUI applied with motile spermatozoa and the pregnancy rate of IUI. Multiple variables were selected such as, patient parameters like age of female, number of IUI, percentage of motile spermatozoa inseminated, endometrial thickness and ovulation induction protocol which were recorded and statistically analyzed. Results: Among the 596 patients, the overall success rate was 11%. The maximum number of successes were observed in patients with 3 IUI applications whereas the success rate was lower in comparison with decreasing IUI applications. The regression between the success and number of insemination and age indicate that there is a statistically significant positive relationship between number of inseminations completed and the rate of successful pregnancy, but no significant relationship between the number of prewash sperm and successful pregnancy. These could be due to lower population size. As an ovulation inducing agent, a 12.42% success rate was observed among the patients administered with FSH whereas 9.28% was observed for patients administered with GONAL F. The mean endometrial thickness was observed to be 8.914 mm with a minimum thickness of 4.5 mm and a maximum thickness of 19 mm. Conclusion: The rationale for the use of insemination is to increase gamete density at the site of fertilization. This revealed that intrauterine insemination should be a firstchoice treatment rather than more invasive and expensive techniques of assisted reproduction in cases of cervical, unexplained and moderate male factor subfertility. Chatt Maa Shi Hosp Med Coll J; Vol.19 (2); July 2020; Page 41-45


2022 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 136-141
Author(s):  
Rajib Roy ◽  
Agniv Sarkar ◽  
Bibhas Saha Dalal

Background: A combination of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination (IUI) remains an important treatment option for couple having infertility. Success rate of IUI with ovulation induction ranges from 8-20% depending on many factors. Aims and Objectives: To assess the factors affecting the success rate of IUI and to evaluate the success of ovulation Induction by different methods of controlled stimulation protocol. Materials and Methods: It is a duration-based prospective cross-sectional study where total of 67 couples were included by inclusion and exclusion criteria. They underwent 90 cycles of IUI with each couple having a maximum of three cycles. Ovulation induction was done by clomiphene citrate or letrozole or gonadotrophins. Semen preparation was done by density gradient method. The outcomewas measured by positive urine pregnancy test. Range, percentage, confidence interval, mean with standard deviation, median, range, and P-value were calculated. P<0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results: Out of 90 IUI cycles 8 were successful resulting in a success rate of 8.8% per cycle and 11.9% per couple. Factors that had a positive impact were follicle size >21 sqmm, endometrial thickness >9 mm, post wash count >15 million/ml, >2 cycles of IUI and on the number of follicles 2 or more on the day of trigger. Conclusion: The study concluded that IUI after ovulation induction can be a simple and safe cost-effective procedure in selected group of infertile couple. Clinical significance IUI following ovulation induction can be a successful approach for specific indications in a low-resource setting where options for other ART interventions are absent or limited.


2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dayong Lee ◽  
Seul Ki Kim ◽  
Jung Ryeol Lee ◽  
Byung Chul Jee

Endometriosis is a common inflammatory disease in women of reproductive age and is one of the major causes of infertility. Endometriosis causes a sustained reduction of ovarian reserve through both physical mechanisms and inflammatory reactions, which result in the production of reactive oxygen species and tissue fibrosis. The severity of endometriosis is related to ovarian reserve. With regard to infertility treatment, medical therapy as a neoadjuvant or adjuvant to surgical therapy has no definite beneficial effect. Surgical treatment of endometriosis can lead to ovarian injury during the resection of endometriotic tissue, which leads to the deterioration of ovarian reserve. To overcome this disadvantage, a multistep technique has been proposed to minimize the reduction of ovarian reserve. When considering surgical treatment of endometriosis in patients experiencing infertility, it should be kept in mind that ovarian reserve can be reduced both due to endometriosis itself and by the process of removing endometriosis. In cases of mild- to moderate-stage endometriosis, intrauterine insemination with ovarian stimulation after surgical treatment may increase the likelihood of pregnancy. In cases of severe endometriosis, the characteristics of the patient should be considered in a multidisciplinary manner to determine the prioritization of treatment modalities, including surgical treatment and assisted reproduction methods such as <i>in vitro</i> fertilization. The risk of cancer, complications after pregnancy, and infection during oocyte retrieval should also be considered when making treatment decisions.


2017 ◽  
Vol 06 (05) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bushra Ahmed ◽  
Gowri Vaidyanathan ◽  
Silja Arumughan Pillai ◽  
Jokha AlSabti ◽  
Maha Al Khaduri ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. S31
Author(s):  
I. Woo ◽  
M. Christianson ◽  
B. Swelstad ◽  
M. Yates ◽  
J. Garcia

2013 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. S432
Author(s):  
G. Boyraz ◽  
S. Gunalp ◽  
R. Menkveld ◽  
L.K. Sokmensuer ◽  
G. Bozdag ◽  
...  

F&S Reports ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-242
Author(s):  
Pietro Bortoletto ◽  
Stephanie F. Willson ◽  
Phillip A. Romanski ◽  
Owen K. Davis ◽  
Zev Rosenwaks

OALib ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 04 (06) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Hanom H. Syam ◽  
Tita H. Madjid ◽  
Jusuf S. Effendi ◽  
Tono Djuwantono ◽  
Wiryawan Permadi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document