Association between male infertility and male-specific malignancies: systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based retrospective cohort studies

2020 ◽  
Vol 114 (5) ◽  
pp. 984-996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Del Giudice ◽  
Alex M. Kasman ◽  
Ettore De Berardinis ◽  
Gian Maria Busetto ◽  
Federico Belladelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Male Infertility ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Studies ◽  
Male Specific

scholarly journals Maternal Exposure to Alcohol and Low Birthweight: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (05) ◽  
pp. 333-347
Author(s):  
Priscilla Perez da Silva Pereira ◽  
Fabiana Araújo Figueiredo Da Mata ◽  
Ana Claudia Morais Godoy Figueiredo ◽  
Roberta Borges Silva ◽  
Maurício Gomes Pereira
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Alcohol Consumption ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Literature Search ◽  
Low Birthweight ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Studies

Objective To investigate the relationship between maternal exposure to alcohol and low birthweight (LBW). Methods The literature search was performed in January 2017 using the following electronic databases: Medline, Embase, LILACS, SciELO, Web of Science, Scopus, CINHAL, Proquest, and PsychInfo. The search strategy used the following terms: alcohol drinking, binge drinking, alcohol-related disorders, alcoholism, alcohol addiction/use/abuse/consumption, light/moderate/social/low drinking, low birthweight, case-control studies, retrospective studies, and cohort studies. No restrictions regarding language or publication date were considered. The literature search yielded 2,383 articles, and after screening and eligibility assessment, 39 articles were included in the systematic review, and 38 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Results Maternal alcohol consumption was associated with LBW among retrospective cohort studies (relative risk [RR] = 1.37; 95%CI [confidence interval]:1.10–1.77; I2 = 98.4%; p < 0.01). Prospective cohort studies (RR = 1.11; 95%CI: 0.98–1.25; I2 = 81.5%; p < 0.01), and case-control studies (odds ration [OR] = 1.16; 95%CI: 0.68–1.97; I2 = 61.2%; p = 0.05) showed no association between alcohol and LBW. No publication bias was identified, and the meta-regression showed that the sample size influenced the high heterogeneity among retrospective cohort studies. The subgroup analysis showed differences in association between groups when compared by sample size, type of adjustment, or crude measures and publication year. Conclusions We have not found an association between alcohol consumption during gestation and LBW in the analysis in all of the subgroups. In addition, we have found a high heterogeneity between the primary studies, which is related to methodological differences in the conduction of these studies.

scholarly journals Relationship between serum uric acid, all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. e052274
Author(s):  
Xue Xue ◽  
Chun-Li Lu ◽  
Xin-Yan Jin ◽  
Xue-Han Liu ◽  
Min Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Uric Acid ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Studies ◽  
The Relationship

ObjectivesTo analyse the relationship between serum uric acid (SUA), all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients to inform clinical practice and future research.DesignA systematic review of observational studies.Data sourcesPubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), SinoMed, Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP) and Wan Fang databases were searched from their inception to January 2021 for cohort and case–control studies reporting SUA and mortality in patients with PD.MethodsThe Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used to appraise quality of cohort and case–control studies. Effect estimates were presented as HRs with 95% CIs in a meta-analysis using STATA V.16.0. Data not suitable for pooling were synthesised qualitatively.ResultsFourteen cohort studies with 24 022 patients were included. No case–control studies were identified. For prospective cohort studies, pooled results for the highest SUA category were significantly greater than the lowest for all-cause (one study; 1278participants; HR 1.79; 95% CI 1.17 to 2.75) and CV mortality (one study; 1278 participants; HR 2.63; 1.62–4.27). An increase of 1 mg/dL in SUA level was associated with a 16% increased risk of all-cause mortality (one study; 1278 participants; HR 1.16; 1.03–1.32) and 34% increased CV mortality risk (one study; 1278 participants; HR 1.34; 1.16–1.55). For retrospective cohort studies, the highest SUA category did not demonstrate an elevated all-cause (five studies; 4570 participants; HR 1.09; 0.70–1.70) or CV mortality (three studies; 3748 participants; HR 1.00; 0.44–2.31) compared with the lowest SUA category. Additionally, there was no increase in all-cause (eight studies; 11 541 participants; HR 0.94; 0.88–1.02) or CV mortality (three studies; 7427 participants; HR 0.90; 0.76–1.06) for every 1 mg/dL increase in SUA level.ConclusionsResults of prospective and retrospective cohort studies were inconsistent. Consequently, prospective, multicentre, long-term follow-up studies are required to confirm the relationship between SUA and mortality in patients with PD.

Timing of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Relationship With Meniscal Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 036354652096448
Author(s):  
Apostolos D. Prodromidis ◽  
Chrysoula Drosatou ◽  
Georgios C. Thivaios ◽  
Nasri Zreik ◽  
Charalambos P. Charalambous
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Meniscal Tears ◽  
Reconstruction Surgery ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Studies ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures are common, but the ideal timing for ACL reconstruction after injury is unclear with regard to meniscal insult. Purpose: To determine whether there is a relationship between timing from ACL rupture to ACL reconstruction and development of meniscal tears within this period. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic literature search was undertaken independently by 2 reviewers using the Cochrane method for systematic reviews in 5 online databases. The reviewers performed independent data extraction and assessment of risk of bias and study quality. The search included any comparative study, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective cohort studies, and case-control studies of an adult population, that assessed the relationship between timing of ACL reconstruction surgery and rates of meniscal tears. Results: After screening, 12 studies (No. of participants = 3042) out of 3390 records were included for analysis: 3 RCTs (n = 272), 2 prospective cohort studies (n = 307), and 7 retrospective cohort studies (n = 2463). In analysis of these studies, rates of reported meniscal tears were compared for ACL procedures performed at 3 and 6 months after injury. Meta-analysis of 5 studies (n = 2012) showed that ACL reconstruction performed >3 months after injury was associated with a higher rate of medial meniscal tears compared with ACL reconstruction performed within 3 months of injury (estimated OR, 2.235; 95% CI, 1.183-4.223; P = .013) but not with a higher rate of lateral meniscal tears. Similarly, meta-analysis of 4 studies (n = 990) showed that ACL reconstruction performed >6 months after injury was associated with a higher rate of medial meniscal tears compared with ACL reconstruction performed within 6 months of injury (estimated OR, 2.487; 95% CI, 1.241-4.984; P = .01) but not with a higher rate of lateral meniscal tears. Conclusion: Our results suggest that delay of ACL reconstruction surgery >3 months after injury is associated with a higher rate of medial meniscal tears within this prereconstruction time frame. Further high-quality prospective studies may help determine whether this is a causal effect. However, based on current evidence, in those patients for whom ACL reconstruction is indicated, ACL reconstruction within 3 months of injury may be recommended. Registration: CRD42016032846 (PROSPERO)

scholarly journals Efficacy of Intrawound Treatments to Prevent Surgical Site Infection after Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. E709-E720
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Povidone Iodine ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Studies

BACKGROUND: Intrawound treatments have been reported to have favorable efficacy for preventing surgical site infection (SSI); however, the best strategy remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of intrawound treatments to prevent SSI after spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Library, EMbase, PubMed, Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Data from the date of inception to March 2, 2020. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies were identified and extracted by 2 reviewers independently. We performed a traditional pairwise meta-analysis to evaluate overall efficacy of intrawound treatments. Meanwhile, a network meta-analysis was performed to compare and rank the treatment efficacy using frequentist approach. RESULTS: Thirty-three publications (6 RCTs and 27 retrospective cohort studies) were included, involving 22,763 patients. For pairwise meta-analysis, the combined results showed that the intrawound treatment had a significantly lower SSI rate than the control group (CG) (odds ratio [OR] = 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31–0.55). For network meta-analysis, the treatment of vancomycin (VA) (OR = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.39-0.71), povidone-iodine (PI) (OR = 0.10; 95% CI, 0.04 - 0.23), and vancomycin + povidone-iodine (VA+PI) (OR = 0.25; 95% CI, 0.11-0.58) were found to be significantly more efficacious than CG on reduction of SSI rate. PI ranked first on reducing SSI, followed by PI+HP, VA+PI, gentamicin (GM), VA, and hydrogen peroxide (HP); CG ranked last. LIMITATIONS: Firstly, only 6 RCTs are included in this systematic review. Retrospective cohort studies tend to exaggerate the real results, although most of them are high-quality according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOQAS). More high-quality RCTs need to be included to obtain convincing conclusions. Secondly, the population of this study involves both adult and pediatric cohorts, patients with tumor, congenital disease, or degenerative disease. There is no subgroup analysis for ages and type of diseases, which might have influence on the overall pooled analysis. Thirdly, we define the application of saline solution and no intrawound treatment as the control group, which might ignore their heterogeneity. Fourthly, follow-up periods are variable and the sample size of HP is small. Finally, additional research is needed to compare the complications of different treatments and the benefits of various dosages. CONCLUSION: We found that VA and PI show promising results on reducing SSI. PI is recommended as the most efficacious intrawound treatment to prevent SSI after spine surgery. KEY WORDS: Intrawound treatments, network meta-analysis, spine, surgery, surgical site infection

scholarly journals Is obstructive sleep apnea associated with difficult airway? Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective and retrospective cohort studies

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. e0204904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahesh Nagappa ◽  
David T. Wong ◽  
Crispiana Cozowicz ◽  
Satya Krishna Ramachandran ◽  
Stavros G. Memtsoudis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Difficult Airway ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Studies

scholarly journals Incidence of Myocardial Injury in COVID-19-Infected Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Diseases ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Narut Prasitlumkum ◽  
Ronpichai Chokesuwattanaskul ◽  
Charat Thongprayoon ◽  
Tarun Bathini ◽  
Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Myocardial Injury ◽  
Event Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Acute Myocardial Injury ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Studies ◽  
Meta Regression ◽  
Substantial Heterogeneity

Introduction: The incidence of acute myocardial injury (AMI) among Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19)-infected patients remain unclear. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to further explore the incidence AMI in these patients. Methods: We comprehensively searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases from their inception to August 2020. The included studies were prospective or retrospective cohort studies that reported the event rate of AMI in COVID-19 patients. Data from each study were combined using random-effects to calculate the pooled incidence with 95% confidence intervals. Results: We identified twenty-seven studies consisting of 8971 hospitalized COVID-19-infected patients. The study demonstrated that 20.0% (95% CI 16.1–23.8% with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 94.9%)) of hospitalized COVID-19 patients had AMI. In addition, our meta-regression suggested that older age, male and comorbidities were associated with a higher risk of AMI. Conclusion: The incidence of COVID-19-related myocardial injury ranges from 16.1–23.8%. Further larger studies are anticipated, as the pandemic is still ongoing.

scholarly journals Prevalence of adenomyosis in endometrial cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Raffone ◽  
Renato Seracchioli ◽  
Diego Raimondo ◽  
Manuela Maletta ◽  
Antonio Travaglino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Included Study ◽  
Pooled Prevalence ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Studies

Abstract Introduction Several studies have assessed the histological co-existence of endometrial carcinoma (EC) and adenomyosis. However, the significance of this association is still unclear. Objective To assess the prevalence of adenomyosis in women with EC for a better understanding of the association between the two diseases. Materials and methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by searching electronics databases from their inception to March 2020, for all studies that allowed extraction of data about prevalence of adenomyosis in EC patients. Adenomyosis prevalence was calculated for each included study and as pooled estimate, with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Eight retrospective cohort studies assessing 5573 EC patients were included in our analysis. Of total, 1322 were patients with adenomyosis, and 4251 were patients without adenomyosis. Pooled prevalence of adenomyosis in EC patients was 22.6% (95% CI 12.7–37.1%). Conclusion Adenomyosis prevalence in EC patients was not different from that reported for other gynecological conditions. The supposed association between the two diseases appears unsupported.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document