Bacteriologic analysis of bone biopsy from diabetic foot infections within a VA patient population

The Foot ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Charles Parks ◽  
Sandy Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Patient Population ◽  
Bone Biopsy ◽  
Diabetic Foot Infections

scholarly journals Are surrogate markers for diabetic foot osteomyelitis remission reliable?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter A Crisologo ◽  
Matthew Malone ◽  
Javier La Fontaine ◽  
Orhan Oz ◽  
Kavita Bhavan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Bone Biopsy ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Surrogate Markers ◽  
Bone Culture ◽  
Soft Tissue Infections ◽  
Diabetic Foot Infections ◽  
Index Site ◽  
Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate surrogate markers commonly used in the literature for diabetic foot osteomyelitis remission after initial treatment for diabetic foot infections. Methods: Thirty-five patients with diabetic foot infections were prospectively enrolled and followed for 12 months. Osteomyelitis was determined from bone culture and histology initially and for recurrence. Chi square and Fischer's exact test were used for dichotomous variables and the student's t-test and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables with an alpha of 0.05. Results: Twenty-four patients were diagnosed with osteomyelitis and eleven patients with soft-tissue infections. 16.7% (n=) of patients with osteomyelitis had a re-infection based on bone biopsy. The success of osteomyelitis treatment varied based on the surrogate marker used to define remission: osteomyelitis infection (16.7%), failed wound healing (8.3%), re-ulceration (20.8%), re-admission (16.7%), amputation (12.5%). There was no difference in outcomes among patients who were initially diagnosed with osteomyelitis and soft tissue infections. There were no differences in osteomyelitis re-infection (16.7% vs 45.5%, p=0.07), wounds that failed to heal (8.3% vs 9.1%, p=0.94), re-ulceration (20.8% vs 27.3%, p=0.67), re-admission for diabetic foot infections at the same site (16.7% vs 36.4%, p=0.20), amputation at the same site after discharge (12.5% vs 36.4%, p=0.10). Osteomyelitis at the index site based on bone biopsy indicated that failed therapy was 16.7%. Indirect markers demonstrated a failure rate ranging from 8.3-20.8%. Conclusions: Most osteomyelitis markers were similar to markers in soft tissue infection subjects. Commonly reported surrogate markers were not shown to be specific to identify patients that failed osteomyelitis treatment when compared with patients that had soft tissue infections. Given this, these surrogate markers are not reliable for use in practice to identify osteomyelitis treatment failure.

scholarly journals Diagnosing Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: Narrative Review and a Suggested 2-Step Score-Based Diagnostic Pathway for Clinicians

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anurag Markanday
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
English Language ◽  
Bone Biopsy ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Initial Assessment ◽  
Medline Search ◽  
Diagnostic Pathway ◽  
Diabetic Foot Infections ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

Abstract The diabetic foot infection remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in many patients and remains a challenging diagnosis for most clinicians. Diagnosis is largely based on clinical signs supplemented by various imaging tests. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not readily available to many clinicians, and bone biopsy, which is the accepted criterion standard for diagnosis, is rarely performed routinely. This evidence-based review and the proposed diagnostic scoring pathway substratifies the current International Working Group on the Diabetes Foot guidelines for diagnosing diabetic foot osteomyelitis into a convenient 2-step diagnostic pathway for clinicians. This proposed diagnostic approach will need further validation prospectively, but it can serve as a useful diagnostic tool during the initial assessment and management of diabetic foot infections. A MEDLINE search of English-language articles on diabetic foot osteomyelitis published between 1986 and March 2014 was conducted. Additional articles were also identified through a search of references from the retrieved articles, published guidelines, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses.

629-P: Bedside Blind Bone Biopsy for Diagnosis of Diabetic Foot Osteitis Allows Similar Healing Rate as Conventional Bone Biopsy

Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 629-P
Author(s):  
FLORINE FÉRON ◽  
LOUIS POTIER ◽  
GAUTHIER PÉAN DE PONFILLY ◽  
DIANE-CÉ CILE GAUTHIER ◽  
ANNE-LISE MUNIER ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Healing Rate ◽  
Bone Biopsy

scholarly journals Spectral and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Pathogens Isolated from Saudi Patients with Diabetic Foot Infections

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-20
Author(s):  
Samiah Hamad S Al-Mijalli
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Antibiotic Susceptibility ◽  
Empirical Therapy ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Foot Ulcers ◽  
Sensitivity Testing ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Diabetic Foot Infections ◽  
Microbiological Methods

Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) are a significant health issue and a common complication among patients with diabetes. To develop antibiotic therapy for these high-risk patients, the current study evaluates the scope of DFIs and identifies the causing microbes. It also measures spectrum and antibiotic susceptibility of the pathogens isolated from adults with DFIs in Saudi Arabia. To achieve the study objectives, a cross-sectional study was implemented and the baseline characteristics for 44 patients with DFIs were defined. Optimal aerobic and anaerobic microbiological techniques were utilized to culture specimens isolated from infected foot ulcers. The standard microbiological methods were employed to identify the bacterial isolates and antibiotic susceptibility testing was conducted following the procedures of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Results showed that 12 microorganisms were isolated from the participants’ diabetic foot ulcers. Staphylococcus Aureus was ranked first because it appeared in 29 (65.9%) cases. Streptococcus Agalactiae was ranked second and multi-microbial infections were also found. Most of the organisms were susceptible to Vancomycin, Ciprofloxacin, and Cefalexin, but they were resistant to Methicillin, Gentamicin, and Ampicillin antibiotics. Staphylococcus Aureus was most sensitive to Ciprofloxacin, while it was resistant to Methicillin. About 10% of the isolates were multidrug-resistant. The study concludes that while Vancomycin should be used empirically for Gram-positive isolates, Ciprofloxacin can be taken into consideration for most of the Gram-negatives aerobes. Based on including various microorganisms and the advent of multidrug-resistant strains, proper culture and sensitivity testing are necessary prior to the empirical therapy.

Clinical, Microbiological and Inflammatory Markers of Severe Diabetic Foot Infections

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Aragón‐Sánchez ◽  
Gerardo Víquez‐Molina ◽  
María Eugenia López‐Valverde ◽  
Javier Aragón‐Hernández ◽  
José María Rojas‐Bonilla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Inflammatory Markers ◽  
Diabetic Foot Infections

scholarly journals Association Between Diabetic Foot Infection Wound Culture Positivity and 1-Year Admission for Invasive Infection: A Multi-Center Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Westyn Branch-Elliman ◽  
Daniel Sturgeon ◽  
Adolf W Karchmer ◽  
Hillary J Mull
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Systemic Infection ◽  
Causative Organism ◽  
Invasive Infection ◽  
Diabetic Foot Ulcers ◽  
Diabetic Foot Infections ◽  
Culture Positivity ◽  
Wound Culture ◽  
Culture Positive ◽  
Culture Negative

Abstract Inpatients with culture-positive diabetic foot infections are at elevated risk for subsequent invasive infection with the same causative organism. In outpatients with index diabetic foot ulcers, we found that wound culture positivity was independently associated with increased odds of 1-year admission for systemic infection when compared to culture-negative wounds.

scholarly journals Prevalence of Peripheral Vascular Disease in Diabetic Foot Infections and its Effect on Management Outcome

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-17
Author(s):  
Farah Nobi ◽  
Syed Al Nahian ◽  
Afrin Sultana ◽  
Rokhsana Sarmin ◽  
Ayesha Rahman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Disease ◽  
Peripheral Vascular Disease ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Peripheral Vascular ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Diabetic Foot Infection ◽  
Diabetic Foot Infections

Background: Foot infection is a common problem affecting diabetics. Ischemia is a major factor contributing to progress and morbidity of the disease. The prevalence of peripheral vascular disease is higher in diabetics with faster progression. Aim: This study aimed to observe the prevalence of peripheral vascular disease in patients with diabetic foot infections presenting to this tertiary care centre. Methods: This prospective observational study evaluated 250 patients with diabetic foot infection admitted to Ibrahim Medical College and BIRDEM General Hospital, Dhaka, from 1st January 2015 to 31st December 2015.Total 72 patients were selected for Duplex study of lower limb vessels, Ankle Brachial Pressure Index (ABPI) and Pulse oxymetrywhich established the diagnosis of peripheral vascular disease and all patients were treated according to the standard protocol. Results: Of the 72 patients peripheral vascular disease was found in 25 patients (34.7%) and majority of them (88%) had distal below the knee vessel stenosis. There was significant correlation with older age (75%) and history of tobacco use (64%). The clinical presentations and outcomes such as hospital stay, healing time, pain were worse in individuals with peripheral vascular compromise on Duplex study of lower limb vessels, ABPI and pulse oxymetry. Conclusion: In this study we observed that significant number of diabetics presenting with foot infections have underlying peripheral vascular disease .The patients might not all be symptomatic or show obvious signs of PVD but need to be investigated for the same. Early detection of peripheral vascular disease in patients presenting with diabetic foot infection, using Duplex study,ABPI and Pulse oxymetrywith routine clinical and laboratory assessment can be of great value in long term care of these individuals. J Bangladesh Coll Phys Surg 2020; 38(1): 12-17

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document