Characterization of the key fuel properties of methyl ester–diesel fuel blends

Fuel ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ertan Alptekin ◽  
Mustafa Canakci
2007 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duran Altıparmak ◽  
Ali Keskin ◽  
Atilla Koca ◽  
Metin Gürü

1996 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.G. Schumacher ◽  
S.C. Borgelt ◽  
D. Fosseen ◽  
W. Goetz ◽  
W.G. Hires

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 1257-1280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abbas Hojati ◽  
Alireza Shirneshan

In this research, a thermodynamic zero-dimensional model has been done to predict performance characteristics (in-cylinder pressure, heat released, and the thermal efficiency) of a diesel engine with the use of biodiesel–diesel fuel blends (B0, B20, B50, B80, and B100) at different compression ratios (14, 15, 16, 17, and 18). The corresponding mathematical and thermodynamic relationships have been solved in MATLAB. Based on the experimental tests, it was found that the developed model can predict the engine variables sufficiently. According to the results, the heat release rate and the cylinder pressure increased for all fuel blends by an increase in the compression ratio. Moreover, with the increasing biodiesel amount in the fuel blend (up to 50%) heat release rate and the cylinder pressure increased but these variables have a reduction when biodiesel percentage increases from 50 to 100 due to the lower heating value of waste cooking oil methyl ester in comparison with neat diesel fuel. Moreover, according to the experimental tests, carbon monoxide emission was reduced when biodiesel proportion increased in the fuel blend but the nitrogen oxides emitted from the engine enhanced when biodiesel amount in the fuel mixture increased. According to the results, it can be concluded that B50 has better combustion characteristics among all fuel blends.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Menelik Walle Mekonen ◽  
Niranjan Sahoo

In this paper, energy, exergy, suitability and economic evaluation of a diesel engine running with diesel fuel and five different types of preheated biodiesel blends were evaluated experimentally. The experiments were carried out at varying engine brake mean effective pressures (bmeps). The energy and exergy rate components of the engine were callcualted and compared for each operating conditions and blends of fuel. The fuel properties of the castor oil methyl ester (COME) at different preheating temeperatures have been tested with a consideration of different biodiesel international standards. The test results shows that the fuel properties of COME improve with increase of fuel inlet temeperatures. At 114°C, kinematic viscosity and density decreased to (5.74 mm2/s and 862 kg/m3), whcich is close to diesel fuel, and the brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) and brake thermal efficiency (BTHE) was improved by 33.1% and 49.6% compared to the fuel preheated temeperature of 42°C. The input fuel energy and exergy rates of blends of fuel were seen to be improved than diesel fuel. The maximum energetic and exergetic efficiency for blended fuels in the test engine at 372 bmep were found in the range of 25−28 % and 23-26%, respectively. The blends of fuel are marginally less sustainable than diesel fuel at every bmeps. The cost analyses show that, all blends of fuel offer quite higher economic cost with respect to diesel fuel. The full economic analysis reveals that only up to 60% blends of fuel is more affordable as compared to diesel.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document