scholarly journals Differences in Performance of Models for Heterogeneous Cores during Pulse Decay Tests

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (15) ◽  
pp. 3206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guofeng Han ◽  
Yang Chen ◽  
Min Liu ◽  
Xiaoli Liu

Shale and fractured cores often exhibit dual-continuum medium characteristics in pulse decay testing. Dual-continuum medium models can be composed of different flow paths, interporosity flow patterns, and matrix shapes. Various dual-continuum medium models have been used by researchers to analyze the results of pulse decay tests. But the differences in their performance for pulse decay tests have not been comprehensively investigated. The characteristics of the dual-permeability model and the dual-porosity model, the slab matrix, and the spherical matrix in pulse decay testing are compared by numerical modeling in this study. The pressure and pressure derivative curves for different vessel volumes, storativity ratios, interporosity flow coefficients, and matrix-fracture permeability ratios were compared and analyzed. The study found that these models have only a small difference in the interporosity flow stage, and the difference in the matrix shape is not important, and the matrix shape cannot be identified by pulse decay tests. When the permeability of the low permeability medium is less than 1% of the permeability of the high permeability medium, the difference between the dual-permeability model and the dual-porosity model can be ignored. The dual-permeability model approaches the pseudo-steady-state model as the interporosity flow coefficient and vessel volume increase. Compared with the dual-porosity model, the dual-permeability model has a shorter horizontal section of the pressure derivative in the interporosity flow stage. Finally, the conclusions were verified against a case study. This study advances the ability of pulse decay tests to investigate the properties of unconventional reservoir cores.

SPE Journal ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (03) ◽  
pp. 289-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huiyun Lu ◽  
Ginevra Di Donato ◽  
Martin J. Blunt

Summary We propose a physically motivated formulation for the matrix/fracture transfer function in dual-porosity and dual-permeability reservoir simulation. The approach currently applied in commercial simulators (Barenblatt et al. 1960; Kazemi et al. 1976) uses a Darcy-like flux from matrix to fracture, assuming a quasisteady state between the two domains that does not correctly represent the average transfer rate in a dynamic displacement. On the basis of 1D analyses in the literature, we find expressions for the transfer rate accounting for both displacement and fluid expansion at early and late times. The resultant transfer function is a sum of two terms: a saturation-dependent term representing displacement and a pressure-dependent term to model fluid expansion. The transfer function is validated through comparison with 1D and 2D fine-grid simulations and is compared to predictions using the traditional Kazemi et al. (1976) formulation. Our method captures the dynamics of expansion and displacement more accurately. Introduction The conventional macroscopic treatment of flow in fractured reservoirs assumes that there are two communicating domains: a flowing region containing connected fractures and high permeability matrix and a stagnant region of low-permeability matrix (Barenblatt et al. 1960; Warren and Root 1963). Conventionally, these are referred to as fracture and matrix, respectively. Transfer between fracture and matrix is mediated by gravitational and capillary forces. In a dual-porosity model, it is assumed that there is no viscous flow in the matrix; a dual-permeability model allows flow in both fracture and matrix. In a general compositional model (where black-oil and incompressible flow are special cases) we can write[Equation 1], where where Gc is a transfer term with units of mass per unit volume per unit time--it is a rate (units of inverse time) times a density (mass per unit volume). c is a component density (concentration) with units of mass of component per unit volume. The subscript p labels the phase, and c labels the component. Gc represents the transfer of component c from fracture to matrix. The subscript f refers to the flowing or fractured domain. The first term is accumulation, and the second term represents flow--this is the same as in standard (nonfractured) reservoir simulation. We can write a corresponding equation for the matrix, m,[Equation 2] where we have assumed a dual-porosity model (no flow in the matrix); for a dual-permeability model, a flow term is added to Eq. 2.


SPE Journal ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. 77-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ginevra Di Donato ◽  
Huiyun Lu ◽  
Zohreh Tavassoli ◽  
Martin Julian Blunt

Summary We develop a physically motivated approach to modeling displacement processes in fractured reservoirs. To find matrix/fracture transfer functions in a dual-porosity model, we use analytical expressions for the average recovery as a function of time for gas gravity drainage and countercurrent imbibition. For capillary-controlled displacement, the recovery tends to its ultimate value with an approximately exponential decay (Barenblatt et al. 1990). When gravity dominates, the approach to ultimate recovery is slower and varies as a power law with time (Hagoort 1980). We apply transfer functions based on these expressions for core-scale recovery in field-scale simulation. To account for heterogeneity in wettability, matrix permeability, and fracture geometry within a single gridblock, we propose a multirate model (Ponting 2004). We allow the matrix to be composed of a series of separate domains in communication with different fracture sets with different rate constants in the transfer function. We use this methodology to simulate recovery in a Chinese oil field to assess the efficiency of different injection processes. We use a streamline-based formulation that elegantly allows the transfer between fracture and matrix to be accommodated as source terms in the 1D transport equations along streamlines that capture the flow in the fractures (Di Donato et al. 2003; Di Donato and Blunt 2004; Huang et al. 2004). This approach contrasts with the current Darcy-like formulation for fracture/matrix transfer based on a shape factor (Gilman and Kazemi 1983) that may not give the correct average behavior (Di Donato et al. 2003; Di Donato and Blunt 2004; Huang et al. 2004). Furthermore, we show that recovery is exceptionally sensitive to parameters that describe the physics of the displacement process, highlighting the need to make careful core-scale measurements of recovery. Introduction Di Donato et al.(2003) and Di Donato and Blunt (2004) proposed a dual-porosity streamline-based model for simulating flow in fractured reservoirs. Conceptually, the reservoir is composed of two domains: a flowing region with high permeability that represents the fracture network and a stagnant region with low permeability that represents the matrix (Barenblatt et al. 1960; Warren and Root 1963). The streamlines capture flow in the flowing regions, while transfer from fracture to matrix is accommodated as source/sink terms in the transport equations along streamlines. Di Donato et al. (2003) applied this methodology to study capillary-controlled transfer between fracture and matrix and demonstrated that using streamlines allowed multimillion-cell models to be run using standard computing resources. They showed that the run time could be orders of magnitude smaller than equivalent conventional grid-based simulation (Huang et al. 2004). This streamline approach has been applied by other authors (Al-Huthali and Datta-Gupta 2004) who have extended the method to include gravitational effects, gas displacement, and dual-permeability simulation, where there is also flow in the matrix. Thiele et al. (2004) have described a commercial implementation of a streamline dual-porosity model based on the work of Di Donato et al. that efficiently solves the 1D transport equations along streamlines.


Author(s):  
Mahdi Abbasi ◽  
Alireza Kazemi ◽  
Mohammad Sharifi

Fractured reservoirs contain most of the oil in the world’s reserves. The existence of two systems of matrix and fracture with completely different characteristics has caused the modeling of the mechanisms of fractured reservoirs to be more complex than conventional ones. Modeling of this type of reservoirs is possible using two methods of single and dual porosity model. Modeling via single porosity scheme is very time-consuming as it takes into account huge matrix blocks (low permeability and high porosity) and small fractures (high permeability and low porosity) alongside each other explicitly. The dual porosity model, however, attempts to solve this problem using the concept of shape factor, which is defined as the amount of fluid transferred from the matrix to the fracture. The shape factor coefficients expressed so far have been derived via simplifying assumptions which keep them away from real conditions prevailing in fractured reservoirs. In this paper, shape factor is calculated more realistically with consideration of the quadratic pressure gradient in the diffusivity equation, the heterogeneity of the matrix block and the change of the rock properties by pressure change. For these three cases, the analytical modeling of the flow of fluid from the matrix to the fracture system has been discussed and its results with previous models have been compared. In addition, the dependence of shape factor on the stated parameters was evaluated and in order to validate the results of the proposed analytical model, its results were compared with the results of a commercial simulator. Investigating the shape factor with the assumptions about the physics of the fractured reservoirs will improve our understanding of the fluid transfer between the matrix and the fracture, and this capability will allow numerical and commercial simulators to predict the behavior of fractured reservoirs more accurately.


SPE Journal ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (04) ◽  
pp. 670-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.. Geiger ◽  
M.. Dentz ◽  
I.. Neuweiler

Summary A major part of the world's remaining oil reserves is in fractured carbonate reservoirs, which are dual-porosity (fracture-matrix) or multiporosity (fracture/vug/matrix) in nature. Fractured reservoirs suffer from poor recovery, high water cut, and generally low performance. They are modeled commonly by use of a dual-porosity approach, which assumes that the high-permeability fractures are mobile and low-permeability matrix is immobile. A single transfer function models the rate at which hydrocarbons migrate from the matrix into the fractures. As shown in many numerical, laboratory, and field experiments, a wide range of transfer rates occurs between the immobile matrix and mobile fractures. These arise, for example, from the different sizes of matrix blocks (yielding a distribution of shape factors), different porosity types, or the inhomogeneous distribution of saturations in the matrix blocks. Thus, accurate models are needed that capture all the transfer rates between immobile matrix and mobile fracture domains, particularly to predict late-time recovery more reliably when the water cut is already high. In this work, we propose a novel multi-rate mass-transfer (MRMT) model for two-phase flow, which accounts for viscous-dominated flow in the fracture domain and capillary flow in the matrix domain. It extends the classical (i.e., single-rate) dual-porosity model to allow us to simulate the wide range of transfer rates occurring in naturally fractured multiporosity rocks. We demonstrate, by use of numerical simulations of waterflooding in naturally fractured rock masses at the gridblock scale, that our MRMT model matches the observed recovery curves more accurately compared with the classical dual-porosity model. We further discuss how our multi-rate dual-porosity model can be parameterized in a predictive manner and how the model could be used to complement traditional commercial reservoir-simulation workflows.


SPE Journal ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (03) ◽  
pp. 367-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reza Naimi-Tajdar ◽  
Choongyong Han ◽  
Kamy Sepehrnoori ◽  
Todd James Arbogast ◽  
Mark A. Miller

Summary Naturally fractured reservoirs contain a significant amount of the world oil reserves. A number of these reservoirs contain several billion barrels of oil. Accurate and efficient reservoir simulation of naturally fractured reservoirs is one of the most important, challenging, and computationally intensive problems in reservoir engineering. Parallel reservoir simulators developed for naturally fractured reservoirs can effectively address the computational problem. A new accurate parallel simulator for large-scale naturally fractured reservoirs, capable of modeling fluid flow in both rock matrix and fractures, has been developed. The simulator is a parallel, 3D, fully implicit, equation-of-state compositional model that solves very large, sparse linear systems arising from discretization of the governing partial differential equations. A generalized dual-porosity model, the multiple-interacting-continua (MINC), has been implemented in this simulator. The matrix blocks are discretized into subgrids in both horizontal and vertical directions to offer a more accurate transient flow description in matrix blocks. We believe this implementation has led to a unique and powerful reservoir simulator that can be used by small and large oil producers to help them in the design and prediction of complex gas and waterflooding processes on their desktops or a cluster of computers. Some features of this simulator, such as modeling both gas and water processes and the ability of 2D matrix subgridding are not available in any commercial simulator to the best of our knowledge. The code was developed on a cluster of processors, which has proven to be a very efficient and convenient resource for developing parallel programs. The results were successfully verified against analytical solutions and commercial simulators (ECLIPSE and GEM). Excellent results were achieved for a variety of reservoir case studies. Applications of this model for several IOR processes (including gas and water injection) are demonstrated. Results from using the simulator on a cluster of processors are also presented. Excellent speedup ratios were obtained. Introduction The dual-porosity model is one of the most widely used conceptual models for simulating naturally fractured reservoirs. In the dual-porosity model, two types of porosity are present in a rock volume: fracture and matrix. Matrix blocks are surrounded by fractures and the system is visualized as a set of stacked volumes, representing matrix blocks separated by fractures (Fig. 1). There is no communication between matrix blocks in this model, and the fracture network is continuous. Matrix blocks do communicate with the fractures that surround them. A mass balance for each of the media yields two continuity equations that are connected by matrix-fracture transfer functions which characterize fluid flow between matrix blocks and fractures. The performance of dual-porosity simulators is largely determined by the accuracy of this transfer function. The dual-porosity continuum approach was first proposed by Barenblatt et al. (1960) for a single-phase system. Later, Warren and Root (1963) used this approach to develop a pressure-transient analysis method for naturally fractured reservoirs. Kazemi et al. (1976) extended the Warren and Root method to multiphase flow using a 2D, two-phase, black-oil formulation. The two equations were then linked by means of a matrix-fracture transfer function. Since the publication of Kazemi et al. (1976), the dual-porosity approach has been widely used in the industry to develop field-scale reservoir simulation models for naturally fractured reservoir performance (Thomas et al. 1983; Gilman and Kazemi 1983; Dean and Lo 1988; Beckner et al. 1988; Rossen and Shen 1989). In simulating a fractured reservoir, we are faced with the fact that matrix blocks may contain well over 90% of the total oil reserve. The primary problem of oil recovery from a fractured reservoir is essentially that of extracting oil from these matrix blocks. Therefore it is crucial to understand the mechanisms that take place in matrix blocks and to simulate these processes within their container as accurately as possible. Discretizing the matrix blocks into subgrids or subdomains is a very good solution to accurately take into account transient and spatially nonlinear flow behavior in the matrix blocks. The resulting finite-difference equations are solved along with the fracture equations to calculate matrix-fracture transfer flow. The way that matrix blocks are discretized varies in the proposed models, but the objective is to accurately model pressure and saturation gradients in the matrix blocks (Saidi 1975; Gilman and Kazemi 1983; Gilman 1986; Pruess and Narasimhan 1985; Wu and Pruess 1988; Chen et al. 1987; Douglas et al. 1989; Beckner et al. 1991; Aldejain 1999).


Ground Water ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 558-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seiyed Mossa Hosseini ◽  
Behzad Ataie-Ashtiani

2007 ◽  
Vol 205 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 123-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin H. Larsson ◽  
Kristian Persson ◽  
Barbro Ulén ◽  
Anders Lindsjö ◽  
Nicholas J. Jarvis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document