scholarly journals Smoking and common mental disorders in patients with chronic conditions: An analysis of data collected via a web-based screening system

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 12-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faith Matcham ◽  
Amy Carroll ◽  
Natali Chung ◽  
Victoria Crawford ◽  
James Galloway ◽  
...  
Crisis ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 215-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Hemelrijk ◽  
Wouter van Ballegooijen ◽  
Tara Donker ◽  
Annemieke van Straten ◽  
Ad Kerkhof

Background: Common mental disorders have been found to be related to suicidal ideation and behavior. Research in the field of web-based interventions for common mental disorders, however, usually excludes participants with a suicidal risk, although a large proportion of participants might suffer from suicidal ideation. Aims: To investigate the prevalence of suicidal ideation in common mental disorders in an online sample. Method: In total, 502 participants completed nine web-based questionnaires on common mental disorders, of which 120 were also interviewed by telephone to obtain a diagnosis. Logistic regression analyses were applied to investigate associations between disorders and suicidal ideation. Results: Based on web-based self-report, 53% of participants had some form of suicidal ideation. Fewer participants reported suicidal ideation during the interview by telephone. Depression (multivariate odds ratio 7.1), generalized anxiety disorder (2.1), social phobia (2.1), and posttraumatic stress disorder (1.7) were significantly associated with suicidal ideation, while a higher number of comorbid common mental disorders increased the risk. Conclusion: Researchers and clinicians should be aware that one out of every two helpseekers on the internet with common mental disorders may have suicidal ideation. Comorbidity of two or more disorders greatly increase the risk of suicidal ideation.


2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fábio Monteiro da Cunha Coelho ◽  
Ricardo Tavares Pinheiro ◽  
Bernardo Lessa Horta ◽  
Pedro Vieira da Silva Magalhães ◽  
Carla Maria Maia Garcias ◽  
...  

A cross-sectional population-based study was conducted to identify the prevalence of common mental disorders and verify the association with chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and the self-reported number of chronic diseases. The Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20) was applied in a multi-stage random sample of 1,276 adults aged 40 and older. Socio-demographic, behavioral, and health-related variables were also obtained using a structured questionnaire. Prevalence of common mental disorders was 30.2%. Lower schooling and social class and the 46-55-year age bracket were associated with psychiatric morbidity. Each chronic illness was independently associated with common mental disorders. However, a stronger association was found between common mental disorders and the total number of self-reported chronic conditions, with a prevalence ratio of 4.67 (95%CI: 3.19-6.83) for five or more self-reported NCDs. The current study emphasizes the importance of common mental disorders in chronically ill patients, particularly in those with more total chronic conditions.


2002 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Hickie ◽  
Tracey Davenport ◽  
Elizabeth Scott ◽  
Hugh Morgan

Objective: To highlight opportunities for enhancing mental health services in primary care through utilisation of e-health systems. Specifically, an information-based website (provided by ‘beyondblue: the national depression initiative’) and a web-based support system for general practitioners (provided by ‘SPHERE: a national depression project’) are described. Conclusions: Recommendations regarding potential roles for e-health systems in association with Australian primary care are outlined.


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e028739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eirini Karyotaki ◽  
Anke M Klein ◽  
Heleen Riper ◽  
Leonore de Wit ◽  
Lisa Krijnen ◽  
...  

IntroductionThe college years are a peak period for the onset of common mental disorders. Poor mental health is associated with low academic attainment, physical, interpersonal and cognitive impairments. Universities can use online approaches to screen students for mental disorders and treat those in need. The present study aims to assess the effectiveness of a guided web-based transdiagnostic individually tailored intervention to treat students with symptoms of depression and/or anxiety.Methodsand analysisThe present study is a randomised controlled trial. Participants are Dutch college students (≥18 years) with mild to moderate depression and/or anxiety symptoms. The intervention is a guided web-based transdiagnostic individually tailored intervention that targets symptoms of depression and/or anxiety. The intervention consists of seven online sessions with a duration ranging from 4 to 7 weeks depending on individual progress. A booster session is administered 4 weeks after the completion of the seventh session. Primary outcome measures are the Patient Health Questionnaire for depression and the Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale for anxiety. These scales are administered at screening, post-treatment and follow-up assessments (6 and 12 months post-randomisation).Ethics and disseminationThe Medical Ethics Committee of the Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre has approved the protocol (registration number 2016.583, A2017.362andA2018.421). Results of the trial will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration numberNTR6797; Pre-results.


Author(s):  
Christina van der Feltz-Cornelis ◽  
Harm van Marwijk ◽  
Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen

This critical review sketches the principles of collaborative care models in general practice for treatment of common mental disorders, such as depressive, anxiety, or somatoform disorders. Such disorders may not be self-limiting and have a tendency to become chronic, and their treatment in the general-practice setting demands a change in organization of general practice according to a chronic care model, i.e. collaborative care. In collaborative care, at least two of the following three professionals work together to alleviate the mental health burden of the patient: the general practitioner (GP), the nurse care-manager (CM), and the consultant psychiatrist (CL). The model is commonly effective but it is also more expensive. The implementation of collaborative care depends on the availability of CMs and CLs, guidelines for psychiatric consultation, reimbursement, and adequate web-based decision aids for the professionals. Its structural implementation in general practice requires a sustained effort at national level.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document