Sa1032 Current State of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Tumor in Patients Treated With Oral Anticoagulants

2016 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. AB210
Author(s):  
Takuto Hikichi ◽  
Ko Watanabe ◽  
Jun Nakamura ◽  
Yuichi Waragai ◽  
Hitomi Kikuchi ◽  
...  
Endoscopy ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 47 (S 01) ◽  
pp. E318-E319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsumi Yamamoto ◽  
Shiro Hayashi ◽  
Tsutomu Nishida ◽  
Hirotsugu Saiki ◽  
Masafumi Naito ◽  
...  

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian-Mei Zhu ◽  
Hong Tu ◽  
Bing Hu ◽  
Xiao Wang

Abstract Background Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been recognized as a safe and minimally invasive technique for the removal of early gastric cancer. Here, we describe a case of extended-duration ESD for a gastric tumor associated with intraoperative perforation and bleeding. Unfortunately, the patient developed acute lung injury (ALI) after the operation. Case presentation: A 72-year-old woman received ESD for a gastric tumor under general anesthesia. Preoperatively, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) showed a 3.1 × 3.5 cm hypoechoic, well-defined mass at the junction of the antrum and body of the stomach on the greater curvature, originating in the muscularis propria layer. During the ESD procedure, when the submucosal mass was stripped, it was found to be closely adhered to the muscular layer and serosa layer, and a full-thickness incision was performed. The abdominal cavity was gradually filled with carbon dioxide gas, and abdominal puncture was performed to reduce intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH). Because the mass adhered to the greater omentum and there was more bleeding during the operation, a long duration of hemostasis and suturing of the wound was required. The whole operation lasted nearly 9 h, and total blood loss was 800 ml. After surgery, acute lung injury was suspected, and the patient was sent to the intensive care unit (ICU) for further treatment. Conclusions The operation time of ESD and IAH caused by perforation are closely related to a poor prognosis. We should pay attention to the impact of operation time on patients and improve awareness regarding protecting important organ functions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (07) ◽  
pp. E857-E864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken Yamashita ◽  
Shiro Oka ◽  
Shinji Tanaka ◽  
Kazuki Boda ◽  
Daiki Hirano ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims Japanese guidelines for gastroenterological endoscopy have recommended temporary withdrawal of anticoagulants (warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants [DOAC], or heparin) to prevent hemorrhagic complications during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal neoplasias (CRNs). However, serious thrombosis might occur during temporary withdrawal of anticoagulants. The current study aimed to evaluate outcomes with anticoagulants in patients undergoing ESD for CRNs. Patients and methods This study was a single-institution retrospective cohort study based on clinical records. We assessed 650 consecutive patients with 698 CRNs who underwent ESD at Hiroshima University Hospital between December 2010 and June 2016. The patients were divided into three groups: the warfarin group (19 patients with 19 CRNs), DOAC group (7 patients with 9 CRNs), and no-antithrombotics group (624 patients with 670 CRNs). We replaced warfarin with heparin 3 to 5 days before endoscopy. Although DOAC was suspended on the morning of endoscopy, we did not replace heparin. Results Bleeding after the procedure occurred in 26.3 % (5/19), 22.0 % (2/9), and 2.7 % (18/670) of patients in the warfarin, DOAC, and no-antithrombotics groups, respectively. In the warfarin group, four patients who bled after the procedure took not only warfarin but also other antiplatelets. En bloc resection rates were 94.7 % (18/19), 100 % (9/9), and 96.6 % (647/670) in the warfarin, DOAC, and no-antithrombotics groups, respectively. No patients experienced ischemic events in the perioperative period. Conclusions Among patients undergoing ESD for CRNs, risk of bleeding was higher among patients who took anticoagulants than among those who did not. In particular, careful attention to patients who took antiplatelets in addition to warfarin before ESD for CRNs is warranted.


2013 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. AB258
Author(s):  
Tomoyuki Boda ◽  
Shiro Oka ◽  
Masanori Ito ◽  
Yoko Matsumoto ◽  
Makoto Higashiyama ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoyuki Boda ◽  
Masanori Ito ◽  
Shiro Oka ◽  
Yoko Kitamura ◽  
Norifumi Numata ◽  
...  

Background.Recently, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become a standard treatment method for early gastric cancer and concurrent stomach preservation. However, metachronous recurrences have become a major problem. We evaluated the incidence and clinicopathologic features of and examined the risk factors for metachronous gastric tumors.Methods.A total of 357 patients who underwent ESD for gastric tumors (245 early gastric cancers and 112 adenomas) and were followed up for more than 12 months without recurrence within the first 12 months were enrolled. We investigated the incidence and clinicopathologic features of metachronous tumors after ESD. We also analyzed the potential risk factors for metachronous tumors using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox’s proportional hazards model.Results.The annual incidence of metachronous tumors after ESD was 2.4%. The median period until discovery after initial ESD was 26.0 months, and the median observation period was 52.6 months. Male patients developed metachronous tumors more frequently (P=0.04), and the hazard ratio of female to male patients was 0.36 (95% confidence interval: 0.11–0.89).Conclusions.Patients with a previous history of gastric tumors have a high risk of subsequent gastric tumor development and male patients should be carefully followed up after ESD for gastric tumor.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document