scholarly journals Effective use of the “clip-flap” method for the endoscopic submucosal dissection of a difficult-to-approach superficial gastric tumor

Endoscopy ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 47 (S 01) ◽  
pp. E318-E319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsumi Yamamoto ◽  
Shiro Hayashi ◽  
Tsutomu Nishida ◽  
Hirotsugu Saiki ◽  
Masafumi Naito ◽  
...  
BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian-Mei Zhu ◽  
Hong Tu ◽  
Bing Hu ◽  
Xiao Wang

Abstract Background Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been recognized as a safe and minimally invasive technique for the removal of early gastric cancer. Here, we describe a case of extended-duration ESD for a gastric tumor associated with intraoperative perforation and bleeding. Unfortunately, the patient developed acute lung injury (ALI) after the operation. Case presentation: A 72-year-old woman received ESD for a gastric tumor under general anesthesia. Preoperatively, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) showed a 3.1 × 3.5 cm hypoechoic, well-defined mass at the junction of the antrum and body of the stomach on the greater curvature, originating in the muscularis propria layer. During the ESD procedure, when the submucosal mass was stripped, it was found to be closely adhered to the muscular layer and serosa layer, and a full-thickness incision was performed. The abdominal cavity was gradually filled with carbon dioxide gas, and abdominal puncture was performed to reduce intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH). Because the mass adhered to the greater omentum and there was more bleeding during the operation, a long duration of hemostasis and suturing of the wound was required. The whole operation lasted nearly 9 h, and total blood loss was 800 ml. After surgery, acute lung injury was suspected, and the patient was sent to the intensive care unit (ICU) for further treatment. Conclusions The operation time of ESD and IAH caused by perforation are closely related to a poor prognosis. We should pay attention to the impact of operation time on patients and improve awareness regarding protecting important organ functions.


2016 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. AB210
Author(s):  
Takuto Hikichi ◽  
Ko Watanabe ◽  
Jun Nakamura ◽  
Yuichi Waragai ◽  
Hitomi Kikuchi ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. AB258
Author(s):  
Tomoyuki Boda ◽  
Shiro Oka ◽  
Masanori Ito ◽  
Yoko Matsumoto ◽  
Makoto Higashiyama ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoyuki Boda ◽  
Masanori Ito ◽  
Shiro Oka ◽  
Yoko Kitamura ◽  
Norifumi Numata ◽  
...  

Background.Recently, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become a standard treatment method for early gastric cancer and concurrent stomach preservation. However, metachronous recurrences have become a major problem. We evaluated the incidence and clinicopathologic features of and examined the risk factors for metachronous gastric tumors.Methods.A total of 357 patients who underwent ESD for gastric tumors (245 early gastric cancers and 112 adenomas) and were followed up for more than 12 months without recurrence within the first 12 months were enrolled. We investigated the incidence and clinicopathologic features of metachronous tumors after ESD. We also analyzed the potential risk factors for metachronous tumors using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox’s proportional hazards model.Results.The annual incidence of metachronous tumors after ESD was 2.4%. The median period until discovery after initial ESD was 26.0 months, and the median observation period was 52.6 months. Male patients developed metachronous tumors more frequently (P=0.04), and the hazard ratio of female to male patients was 0.36 (95% confidence interval: 0.11–0.89).Conclusions.Patients with a previous history of gastric tumors have a high risk of subsequent gastric tumor development and male patients should be carefully followed up after ESD for gastric tumor.


2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (14) ◽  
pp. 2015-2018
Author(s):  
Ikuhiro Kobori ◽  
Yasumi Katayama ◽  
Kazunori Hayashi ◽  
Yo Fujimoto ◽  
Mayuko Kaneko ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. AB303
Author(s):  
Yu Sasaki ◽  
Yasuhiko Abe ◽  
Kazuya Yoshizawa ◽  
Takeshi Sato ◽  
Eiki Nomura ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 205435811988714 ◽  
Author(s):  
William K. Silverstein ◽  
Christopher Teshima ◽  
Simran Jolly ◽  
Jeffrey Perl

Rationale: The evidence supporting the safety of restarting peritoneal dialysis (PD) immediately after abdominal surgery and interventions is scant. In particular, there are no reported cases characterizing periprocedural management of PD for patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric intramucosal tumor removal. Presenting concerns of the patient: A 66-year-old female with end-stage kidney disease secondary to diabetic nephropathy, currently on nocturnal automatic PD, presented with new iron-deficiency anemia. Workup revealed an intramucosal gastric lesion proximal to the pylorus, without surrounding lymph node involvement. Endoscopic submucosal dissection was performed with en bloc endoscopic resection of a 5-cm, partially flat, partially sessile mass along the posterior wall and lesser curvature of the gastric antrum. Pathology revealed low-grade dysplasia without features of malignancy. There was no evidence of hemorrhage or leak post-dissection. Diagnoses: The clinical presentation was consistent with an uncomplicated endoscopic submucosal dissection. Interventions: Peritoneal dialysis was held for 48 hours and restarted thereafter with no complications. The patient did not require bridging with hemodialysis. Outcomes: The patient had an uncomplicated post-endoscopic course, with no subsequent episodes of PD-associated peritonitis after at least 6-month follow-up. Novel finding: This is the first reported case of PD reinitiation after endoscopic submucosal dissection of a gastric tumor.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document