Recommendations for follow-up interval after colonoscopy with inadequate bowel preparation in a national colonoscopy quality registry

Author(s):  
Audrey H. Calderwood ◽  
Jennifer L. Holub ◽  
David A. Greenwald
2018 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. AB113
Author(s):  
David A. Greenwald ◽  
Glenn Eisen ◽  
Brett B. Bernstein ◽  
Mark B. Pochapin ◽  
Colleen M. Schmitt ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Berger ◽  
E Cesbron-Métivier ◽  
S Bertrais ◽  
A Olivier ◽  
A Becq ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 2740
Author(s):  
Efrat L. Amitay ◽  
Tobias Niedermaier ◽  
Anton Gies ◽  
Michael Hoffmeister ◽  
Hermann Brenner

The success of a colonoscopy in detecting and removing pre-cancerous and cancerous lesions depends heavily on the quality of bowel preparation. Despite efforts, 20–44% of colonoscopy participants have an inadequate bowel preparation. We aimed to assess and compare risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation and for the presence of advanced colorectal neoplasms in routine screening practice. In this cross-sectional study, among 8125 participants of screening colonoscopy in Germany with a comprehensive assessment of sociodemographic factors, lifestyle and medical history, we examined factors associated with inadequate bowel preparation and with findings of advanced neoplasms using adjusted log-binomial regression models. Among the identified risk factors assessed, three factors were identified that were significantly associated with inadequate bowel preparation: age ≥ 70 years (adjusted prevalence ratios, aPR, 1.50 95%CI 1.31–1.71), smoking (aPR 1.29 95%CI 1.11–1.50) and abdominal symptoms (aPR 1.14 95%CI 1.02–1.27). The same risk factors were also associated with the prevalence of advanced neoplasms in our study (aPR 1.72, 1.62 and 1.44, respectively). The risk factors associated with inadequate bowel preparation in this study were also associated with a higher risk for advanced neoplasms. Inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy might lead to missed colorectal cancer (CRC) precursors and the late diagnosis of CRC. People at high risk of advanced neoplasms are in particular need of enhanced bowel preparation.


2014 ◽  
Vol 146 (5) ◽  
pp. S-736-S-737
Author(s):  
Jodie A. Barkin ◽  
Daniel A. Sussman ◽  
James S. Leavitt ◽  
Jamie S. Barkin

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. e021249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilse van Beusekom ◽  
Ferishta Bakhshi-Raiez ◽  
Nicolette F de Keizer ◽  
Dave A Dongelmans ◽  
Marike van der Schaaf

ObjectivesScreening for symptoms of postintensive care syndrome is based on a long list of questionnaires, filled out by the intensive care unit (ICU) survivor and manually reviewed by the health professional. This is an inefficient and time-consuming process. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a web-based triage tool and to compare the outcomes from web-based questionnaires to those from paper-based questionnaires.DesignA mixed-methods study.SettingNine Dutch ICU follow-up clinics.Participants221 ICU survivors and 14 health professionals.InterventionsA web-based triage tool was implemented by nine ICU follow-up clinics. End users, that is, health professionals were interviewed in order to evaluate the feasibility of the triage tool. ICU survivors were invited to fill out web-based questionnaires 3 months after hospital discharge.Primary outcomesOutcomes of the questionnaires were merged with clinical data from a national quality registry to assess the differences in outcomes between paper-based and web-based questionnaires.Results221 ICU survivors received an invitation to fill out questionnaires, 93 (42.1%) survivors did not respond to the invitation. Respondents to the web-based questionnaires (n=54) were significantly younger and had a significantly longer ICU stay than those who preferred the paper-based questionnaires (n=74). The prevalence of mental, physical and nutritional problems was high, although comparable between the groups. Health professionals’ interviews revealed that the software was complex to use (n=8) and although emailing survivors is very convenient, not all survivors have an email address (n=7).ConclusionsWeb-based screening software has major benefits compared with paper-based screening. However, implementation has shown to be rather difficult and there are important barriers to consider. Although different in age, the health status is comparable between the users of the web-based questionnaire and paper-based questionnaire.


2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Magnus Petersson-Ahrholt ◽  
Thomas Wiebe ◽  
Lars Hjorth ◽  
Thomas Relander ◽  
Helena M. Linge

PURPOSE Survival rates after childhood cancer have increased from 20% to 80% since the 1970s. The increased number of survivors emphasizes the importance of late effects and their monitoring. Late effects may have a strong impact on quality of life in survivors. The purpose of this study was to make key data in a quality registry available for direct clinical use, enabling health care professionals to perform efficient and appropriate long-term medical follow-up after childhood cancer treatment. METHODS The population-based quality registry upon which this study is centered contains data on all individuals diagnosed with childhood cancer (diagnosed at 18 years of age or younger) in southern Sweden since January 1, 1970, and treatment data on 5-year survivors. Web tools, which were developed and implemented in a health care setting, generate a personalized treatment summary for each patient and enable risk group stratification of survivors. RESULTS Generation of a personalized treatment summary and risk group stratification of survivors led to identification of women at risk for developing breast cancer as a consequence of childhood cancer treatment. Three novel cases of previously undiagnosed breast cancer were identified. CONCLUSION The registry, together with the developed tools, enabled health care professionals to perform medical follow-up in this at-risk patient population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document