An Audit Of Glucose Lowering Therapies in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Hospitalisation for Heart Failure

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. S358
Author(s):  
D. Gayed ◽  
M. Azraai ◽  
B. Liu ◽  
C. McMaster ◽  
R. O’Donavan ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
pp. 823-830 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline K. Kramer ◽  
Chang Ye ◽  
Sara Campbell ◽  
Ravi Retnakaran

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 205-224
Author(s):  
Elisa Fabbri ◽  
Maurizio Nizzoli

Heart failure (HF) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) often coexist and having both the diseases compared to having one alone is associated with greater challenges in their management/treatment and worse outcomes. The present review of the literature is aimed at providing a comprehensive synopsis of the main evidences about the treatment of the two coexisting conditions. In particular, the recent introduction of new glucose-lowering drugs has been deeply changing the therapeutic approach to T2D. Big randomized controlled trails (RCTs) developed to test the cardiovascular safety of these new drugs consistently highlighted a reduction of the risk of hospitalization for HF in patients with T2D treated with sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, suggesting a potential and revolutionary class effect probably related to their diuretic effect. Moreover, a renal protective effect of this drug class has also been emerging and the beneficial effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on the risk of HF hospitalization seems to be even greater in patients with worse renal function. In conclusion, although the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood, SGLT2 inhibitors appear to be a promising tool to treat HF and T2D. Ongoing RCTs specifically enrolling patients with HF treated with SGLT2 inhibitors will provide more insights and further information.


2019 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 211-217
Author(s):  
Pieter Martens ◽  
Joyce Janssens ◽  
Jobbe Ramaekers ◽  
Matthias Dupont ◽  
Wilfried Mullens

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerard Marshall Raj ◽  
Mukta Wyawahare

Dapagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor used in the management of Type 2 diabetes mellitus, has been recently approved for the control of worsening cardiovascular events, including deaths and hospitalizations, in adults with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Previously, canagliflozin had a label change with regards to its additional usage in the reduction of risk of hospitalization for heart failure in patients with both Type 2 diabetes mellitus and diabetic nephropathy with albuminuria. On the other hand, the therapeutic application of empagliflozin and ertugliflozin in heart failure is yet to be delineated comprehensively. The beneficial effects of these SGLT2 inhibitors, dapagliflozin in particular, in heart failure are found to be independent of neither the glucose-lowering nor the SGLT2 inhibiting effects.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Tanaka ◽  
Shigeru Toyoda ◽  
Takumi Imai ◽  
Kazuki Shiina ◽  
Hirofumi Tomiyama ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce the risk of a deterioration in heart failure (HF) and mortality in patients with a broad range of cardiovascular risks. Recent guidelines recommend considering the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and HF, irrespective of their glycemic control status and background use of other glucose-lowering agents including metformin. However, only a small number of studies have investigated whether the effects of SGLT2 inhibitor in these patients differ by the concomitant use of other glucose-lowering agents. Methods This was a post-hoc analysis of the CANDLE trial (UMIN000017669), an investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial. The primary aim of the analysis was to assess the effect of 24 weeks of treatment with canagliflozin, relative to glimepiride, on N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentration in patients with T2D and clinically stable chronic HF. In the present analysis, the effect of canagliflozin on NT-proBNP concentration was assessed in the patients according to their baseline use of other glucose-lowering agents. Results Almost all patients in the CANDLE trial presented as clinically stable (New York Heart Association class I to II), with about 70% of participants having HF with a preserved ejection fraction phenotype (defined as a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 50%) at baseline. Of the 233 patients randomized to either canagliflozin (100 mg daily) or glimepiride (starting dose 0.5 mg daily), 85 (36.5%) had not been taking any glucose-lowering agents at baseline (naïve). Of the 148 patients who had been taking at least one glucose-lowering agent at baseline (non-naïve), 44 (29.7%) and 127 (85.8%) had received metformin or a dipeptidyl dipeptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, respectively. The group ratio (canagliflozin vs. glimepiride) of proportional changes in the geometric means of NT-proBNP concentration was 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76 to 1.18, p = 0.618) for the naïve subgroup, 0.92 (95% CI 0.79 to1.07, p = 0.288) for the non-naïve subgroup, 0.90 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.20, p = 0.473) for the metformin-user subgroup, and 0.91 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.08, p = 0.271) for the DPP-4 inhibitor-user subgroup. No heterogeneity in the effect of canagliflozin, relative to glimepiride, on NT-proBNP concentration was observed in the non-naïve subgroups compared to that in the naïve subgroup. Conclusion The impact of canagliflozin treatment on NT-proBNP concentration appears to be independent of the background use of diabetes therapy in the patient population examined. Trial registration University Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry, number 000017669. Registered on May 25, 2015


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Müller-Wieland ◽  
J. Brandts ◽  
M. Verket ◽  
N. Marx ◽  
K. Schütt

AbstractReduction of glucose is the hallmark of diabetes therapy proven to reduce micro- and macro-vascular risk in patients with type 1 diabetes. However glucose-lowering efficacy trials in type 2 diabetes didn’t show major cardiovascular benefit. Then, a paradigm change in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes has emerged due to the introduction of new blood glucose-lowering agents. Cardiovascular endpoint studies have proven HbA1c-independent cardioprotective effects for GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT-2 inhibitors. Furthermore, SGLT-2 inhibitors reduce the risk for heart failure and chronic kidney disease. Mechanisms for these blood glucose independent drug target-related effects are still an enigma. Recent research has shown that GLP-1 receptor agonists might have anti-inflammatory and plaque stabilising effects whereas SGLT-2 inhibitors primarily reduce pre- and after-load of the heart and increase work load efficiency of the heart. In addition, reduction of intraglomerular pressure, improved energy supply chains and water regulation appear to be major mechanisms for renoprotection by SGLT-2 inhibitors. These studies and observations have led to recent changes in clinical recommendations and treatment guidelines for type 2 diabetes. In patients with high or very high cardio-renal risk, SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists have a preferred recommendation independent of baseline HbA1c levels due to cardioprotection. In patients with chronic heart failure, chronic kidney disease or at respective risks SGLT-2 inhibitors are the preferred choice. Therefore, the treatment paradigm of glucose control in diabetes has changed towards using diabetes drugs with evidence-based organ protection improving clinical prognosis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 73-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Prattichizzo ◽  
Lucia La Sala ◽  
Lars Rydén ◽  
Nikolaus Marx ◽  
Marc Ferrini ◽  
...  

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a major risk factor for developing cardiovascular disease, and many patients with diabetes have prevalent cardiovascular complications. Recent cardiovascular outcome clinical trials suggest that certain new glucose-lowering drugs are accompanied by additional cardioprotective properties. Indeed, selected glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists have a proved cardiovascular benefit in terms of a reduced incidence of ischaemic events, while sodium/glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors have also shown significant protection, with a striking effect on heart failure and renal endpoints. These findings have been integrated in recent guidelines which now recommend prescribing (when initial metformin monotherapy fails) a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist or a sodium/glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor with clinical trial-confirmed benefit in patients with diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and a sodium/glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor in such patients with heart failure or chronic kidney disease at initial stages. Furthermore, the new 2019 European Society of Cardiology guidelines in collaboration with the European Association for the Study of Diabetes recommend a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist or a sodium/glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor in treatment-naive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with pre-existing cardiovascular disease or at high cardiovascular risk. Future research will disentangle the mechanisms underpinning these beneficial effects and will also establish to what extent these results are generalisable to the whole diabetes population. In the meantime, available evidence should prompt a wide diffusion of these two classes of drugs among patients with diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Here, we briefly summarise recent findings emerging from cardiovascular outcome clinical trials, discuss their impact on treatment algorithms and propose new possible approaches to improve our knowledge further regarding the cardiovascular effect of glucose-lowering medications.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
William Hinton ◽  
Michael D. Feher ◽  
Neil Munro ◽  
Mark Joy ◽  
Simon de Lusignan

Abstract Background Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) are licenced for initiation for glucose lowering in people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m2). However, recent trial data have shown that these medications have renal and cardio-protective effects, even for impaired kidney function. The extent to which trial evidence and updated guidelines have influenced real-world prescribing of SGLT-2is is not known, particularly with co-administration of diuretics. Methods We performed a cross-sectional analysis of people with T2DM registered with practices in the Oxford-Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Research and Surveillance Centre (RSC) database on the 31st July 2019. We calculated the percentage of people prescribed SGLT-2is according to eGFR categories (< 45, 45–59, and ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m2), with a heart failure diagnosis and stratified by body mass index categories (underweight, normal weight, overweight, obese), and with concomitant prescription of a diuretic. Multilevel logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether heart failure diagnosis and renal function were associated with SGLT-2i prescribing. Results From a population of 242,624 people with T2DM across 419 practices, 11.0% (n = 26,700) had been prescribed SGLT-2is. The majority of people initiated SGLT-2is had an eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m2 (93.2%), and 4.3% had a heart failure diagnosis. 9,226 (3.8%) people were prescribed SGLT-2is as an add-on to their diuretic prescription. People in the highest eGFR category (≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m2) were more likely to be prescribed SGLT-2is than those in eGFR lower categories. Overweight (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.841–2.274) and obese people (OR 3.84, 95% CI 3.472–4.250) were also more likely to be prescribed these medications, whilst use of diuretics (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.682–0.804) and heart failure (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.653–0.998) were associated with lower odds of being prescribed SGLT-2is. Conclusions Prescribing patterns of SGLT-2is for glucose lowering in T2DM in primary care generally concur with licenced indications according to recommended renal thresholds. A small percentage of people with heart failure were prescribed SGLT-2is for T2DM. An updated analysis is merited should UK National Institute for Health Care and Excellence prescribing guidelines for T2DM be revised to incorporate new data on the benefits for those with reduced renal function or with heart failure.


2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 609-613
Author(s):  
Мaryana М. Rоsul ◽  
Мiroslava М. Bletskan ◽  
Nataliya V. Ivano ◽  
Marina O. Korabelschykova ◽  
Yelyzaveta І. Rubtsova

The aim is to explore the possibilities of improving the effectiveness in preventing cardiovascular diseases and heart failure using sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors. Materials and methods: The analysis of the existing clinical and experimental data on the effect of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors on the cardiovascular system, the condition of kidneys, cardiovascular risk factors. Review: SGLT-2 inhibitors are the first class of glucose-lowering agents in large-scale studies (EMPA-REG OUTCOME, CANVAS, CVD-REAL, CVD-REAL2) which have demonstrated the ability to improve cardiorenal outcomes and reduce the risk of hospitalization with heart failure in patients with diabetes. In addition to hypoglycaemic action, SGLT-2 inhibitors show a number of pleiotropic effects, which are potentially capable of reducing cardiovascular risk: diuretic effect, decrease in: blood pressure, arterial wall stiffness, waist and body weight, expression of albuminuria, etc. The use of drugs of this class opens great prospects not only in terms of glycaemic control, but also in the prevention of cardiovascular complications of diabetes. Conclusions: 1. When choosing glucose-lowering agents in patients with type 2 diabetes, it is necessary to take into account their impact on the risk of development and the course of heart failure. 2. SGLT-2 inhibitors ought to be considered as a preferred method of treatment for type 2 diabetes in patients with heart failure or with a risk of heart failure that meets the latest recommendations of the European and American Diabetes Association.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document