scholarly journals The impact of hospital volume and charlson score on postoperative mortality of pancreatic surgery for tumors. A Nationwide Study of 12286 patients

HPB ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S750
Author(s):  
M. el Amrani ◽  
X. Lenne ◽  
G. Clement ◽  
C. Laueriere ◽  
d. theis ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 268 (5) ◽  
pp. 854-860 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehdi El Amrani ◽  
Guillaume Clement ◽  
Xavier Lenne ◽  
Moshe Rogosnitzky ◽  
Didier Theis ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 122-122
Author(s):  
Christophe Mariette ◽  
Arnaud Pasquer ◽  
Florence Renaud ◽  
Flora Hec ◽  
Anne Gandon ◽  
...  

122 Background: More than age, patient comorbidity is increasingly considered as the prominent predictor of postoperative mortality (POM) in esophageal and gastric cancer surgery, leading a growing number of elderly to be operated on. However, the respective impact of age and comorbidity on POM remains to be elucidated. The study objective was to investigate the impact of age on POM according to patient comorbidity. Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent esophageal or gastric cancer surgery between 2010 and 2012 in France were included (n = 11,196). The 30-day POM was compared by age groups (20-39, 40-59, 60-79, ≥ 80) and stratified according to the Charlson score (0, 1-2, ≥ 3). The consistency across esophageal (n = 3286) and gastric (n = 7910) subgroups and variations between 30-day and 90-day POM were analyzed. Results: Patients ≥ 60 years represented 73.8% of cases. A linear increase in 30-day and 90-day POM was observed with increasing age, with rates of 0.9% and 2.1%, 2.4% and 5.4%, 4.8% and 8.8%, and 9.3% and 15.9% in 20-39, 40-59, 60-79, ≥ 80 years age groups, respectively ( P< 0.001). Comparing 20-39 and ≥ 80 years age groups, 30-day POM was 1.0% vs. 7.0% for Charlson 0 ( P< 0.001), 3.1% vs. 11.1% for Charlson1-2 ( P< 0.001) and 0% vs. 19.5% for Charlson ≥ 3 ( P= 0.020) patients. A similar linear increase of POM by growing age groups was observed for 90-day POM and in esophagus and stomach subgroups. By multivariable analysis age groups (OR 1.03 95%CI 1.02-1.04, p < 0.001) and Charlson score (OR 1.56 95%CI 1.43-1.70, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of POM. Conclusions: Age and patient comorbidity have a similar and cumulative impact on POM after esophageal and gastric cancer surgery.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 696
Author(s):  
Andreas Andreou ◽  
Pauline Aeschbacher ◽  
Daniel Candinas ◽  
Beat Gloor

As life expectancy is increasing, elderly patients are evaluated more frequently for resection of benign or malignant pancreatic lesions. However, the impact of age on postoperative morbidity, mortality, and treatment costs in octogenarian patients (≥80 years) undergoing major pancreatic surgery needs further investigation. The clinicopathological data of patients who underwent pancreatic surgery between January 2015 and March 2019 in a major hepatopancreatobiliary center in Switzerland were assessed. Postoperative outcomes and hospital costs of octogenarians and younger patients were compared in univariate and multivariate regression analysis. During the study period, 346 patients underwent pancreatic resection. Pancreatoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy, total pancreatectomy, and other procedures were performed in 54%, 20%, 13%, and 13% of patients, respectively. The major postoperative morbidity rate and postoperative mortality rate were 25% and 3.5%, respectively. A total of 39 patients (11%) were ≥80 years old, and 307 patients were <80 years old. The majority of octogenarians suffered from ductal adenocarcinoma, whereas among younger patients, other indications for a pancreatic resection were predominant (ductal adenocarcinoma 64% vs. 41%, p = 0.006). Age ≥80 was associated with more frequent postoperative medical (pulmonary, cardiovascular) and surgical (high-grade pancreatic fistula, postoperative hemorrhage) complications. Postoperative mortality was significantly higher in octogenarians (15.4% vs. 2%, p < 0.0001). This finding may be explained by the higher rate of type C pancreatic fistula (13% vs. 5%), resulting more frequently in postoperative hemorrhage (18% vs. 5%, p = 0.002) among patients ≥80 years old. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, patient age ≥80 years predicted postoperative mortality independently of the tumor entity and surgical technique (p = 0.013, OR 6.71, 95% CI [1.5–30.3]). Increased major postoperative morbidity was responsible for lower cost recovery in octogenarians (94% vs. 102%, p = 0.046). In conclusion, patient age ≥80 years is associated with increased postoperative medical and surgical morbidity after major pancreatic surgery leading to lower cost recovery and a lower chance for successful resuscitation in patients requiring revisional surgery for postoperative hemorrhage and/or pancreatic fistula. In octogenarian patients suffering from pancreatic tumors, careful selection, and thorough prehabilitation is crucial to achieve the best postoperative and long-term oncologic outcomes.


2016 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-30
Author(s):  
Héctor Ortiz ◽  
Sebastiano Biondo ◽  
Antonio Codina ◽  
Miguel Á. Ciga ◽  
José M. Enríquez-Navascués ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 1001-1018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koji Iihara ◽  
Kunihiro Nishimura ◽  
Akiko Kada ◽  
Jyoji Nakagawara ◽  
Kazunori Toyoda ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 158-165
Author(s):  
Ilaria Pergolini ◽  
I. Ekin Demir ◽  
Christian Stöss ◽  
Klaus Emmanuel ◽  
Robert Rosenberg ◽  
...  

Background: This survey aimed to register changes determined by the COVID-19 pandemic on pancreatic surgery in a specific geographic area (Germany, Austria, and Switzerland) to evaluate the impact of the pandemic and obtain interesting cues for the future. Methods: An online survey was designed using Google Forms focusing on the local impact of the pandemic on pancreatic surgery. The survey was conducted at 2 different time points, during and after the lockdown. Results: Twenty-five respondents (25/56) completed the survey. Many aspects of oncological care have been affected with restrictions and delays: staging, tumor board, treatment selection, postoperative course, adjuvant treatments, outpatient care, and follow-up. Overall, 60% of respondents have prioritized pancreatic cancer patients according to stage, age, and comorbidities, and 40% opted not to operate high-risk patients. However, for 96% of participants, the standards of care were guaranteed. Discussion/Conclusions: The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic had an important impact on pancreatic cancer surgery in central Europe. Guidelines for prompt interventions and prevention of the spread of viral infections in the surgical environment are needed to avoid a deterioration of care in cancer patients in the event of a second wave or a new pandemic. High-volume centers for pancreatic surgery should be preferred and their activity maintained. Virtual conferences have proven to be efficient during this pandemic and should be implemented in the near future.


2009 ◽  
Vol 45 (7) ◽  
pp. 1248-1256 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.L. Frederiksen ◽  
M. Osler ◽  
H. Harling ◽  
Steen Ladelund ◽  
T. Jørgensen

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Krautz ◽  
Axel Denz ◽  
Georg F. Weber ◽  
Robert Grützmann

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document