BRAF inhibitor therapy–associated melanocytic lesions lack the BRAF V600E mutation and show increased levels of cyclin D1 expression

2016 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 79-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kumaran Mudaliar ◽  
Michael T. Tetzlaff ◽  
Madeleine Duvic ◽  
Ana Ciurea ◽  
Sharon Hymes ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (05) ◽  
pp. 228-231
Author(s):  
M. Ahmed ◽  
F. Meier ◽  
S. Beissert

ZusammenfassungDas Langzeitüberleben hat sich für Patienten mit metastasiertem Melanom durch die Etablierung der zielgerichteten Therapien sowie Immuntherapien mit 5-Jahres-Überlebensraten von ca. 50 % deutlich verbessert. Hirnmetastasen stellen jedoch weiterhin eine therapeutische Herausforderung dar. In der Vergangenheit lag das mediane Überleben für Patienten mit neu diagnostizierten Hirnmetastasen bei 2 – 6 Monaten 1. Retrospektive Analysen sprechen für einen Überlebensbenefit unter multimodaler Therapie mit einer 5-Jahres-Überlebensrate von über 20 % 1.Wir berichten über einen 50-jährigen Patienten mit multiplen symptomatischen Hirnmetastasen bei Erstdiagnose. Nach Exstirpation einer symptomatischen Metastase wurde bei BRAF-V600E-Mutation eine Systemtherapie mit dem BRAF-Inhibitor Dabrafenib in Kombination mit dem MEK-Inhibitor Trametinib eingeleitet. Hierunter zeigte sich ein rascher deutlicher Regress der zerebralen und extrazerebralen Metastasen. Nach 8 Wochen wurde die Systemtherapie auf eine Immuntherapie mit Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab umgesetzt. Kurz nach Therapieeinleitung trat ein epileptischer Anfall auf und die Hirnmetastasen zeigten sich wieder progredient. Zwei symptomatische Hirnmetastasen wurden reseziert, eine Ganzhirnradiatio mit Hippocampusschonung wurde eingeleitet und die Immuntherapie fortgesetzt. Aktuell erfolgt eine zielgerichtete Therapie mit Encorafenib und Binimetinib. 17 Monate nach Erstdiagnose befindet sich der Patient in gutem Allgemeinzustand ohne neurologische Defizite. Dieser Fallbericht bestätigt den retrospektiv beobachteten Überlebensbenefit für Patienten mit Hirnmetastasen unter multimodaler Therapie.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 262-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Arcaini ◽  
Silvia Zibellini ◽  
Emanuela Boveri ◽  
Roberta Riboni ◽  
Sara Rattotti ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 262 Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is an indolent neoplasm of small mature B-lymphoid cells, which are found in peripheral blood and bone marrow (BM), and are characterized by hairy projections of their abundant cytoplasm. In clinical practice, HCL needs to be differentiated from similar indolent lymphoid neoplasms. In a study based on massively parallel sequencing of the whole exome of leukemic and matched normal cells from a HCL patient and subsequent targeted resequencing in additional patients, Tiacci et al (N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 16;364:2305–15) have recently identified the BRAF V600E mutation as a genetic alteration associated with this disease. This somatic mutation was previously detected in diverse human cancers, with a particularly high frequency in melanoma (Nature. 2002 Jun 27;417:949–54; N Engl J Med. 2005 Nov 17;353:2135–47). In order to develop a reliable molecular diagnostic tool and verify its sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of HCL, we developed an allele-specific PCR for the BRAF V600E mutation, and searched for this molecular lesion in a series of 239 patients with mature B-cell lymphoid neoplasms. The study population included 62 patients with HCL, 91 with splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL), 29 with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), and 57 with B-cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorders (B-CLPD). Genomic DNA was extracted from bone marrow (BM) biopsies in 61 cases of HCL, from BM in 90 patients with diverse lymphoid neoplasms (33 SMZL, 29 WM, 28 B-CLPD), and from peripheral blood (PB) in the remaining 88 patients (1 HCL, 58 SMZL, 29 B-CLPD). The BRAF V600E mutation was detected in all patients with HCL (62/62) and in none of those with SMZL or WM. Two of the 57 patients with B-CLPD carried the mutation, and their clinical features are as follows. Case #1. This 41 year-old woman presented in November 2008 with asymptomatic lymphocytosis, without any evidence of lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly or hepatomegaly. Laboratory data showed: Hb 12.9 g/dL, WBC count 16 × 109/L (62% lymphoid cells), and PLT count 283 × 109/L. On BM biopsy, an interstitial lymphoid infiltrate (60% of the whole cellularity) composed by small, lymphocyte/centrocyte-like cells was found. By immunohistochemistry, neoplastic cells showed expression of CD20, CD79a and cyclin-D1, but were uniformly negative for CD5, CD10, CD23, CD25 and DBA44, and annexin A1. At flow cytometry analysis, they were CD20 and FMC7 positive and CD10, CD38, CD5, CD23, CD11c, CD25, DBA44 and CD103 negative. FISH for t(11;14), performed for cyclin D1 expression, was negative. Immunoglobulin rearrangement was IGHV3-48*02, IGHD7-27*01 IGHJ4*02. So far, lymphocytosis has remained stable and the patient is regularly followed without any need for treatment. Case #2. This 62 year-old male presented in 2006 with thrombocytopenia and splenomegaly, and was diagnosed with HCL was established in another hospital (no additional data are available). He was treated with cladribine with a partial response. In May 2008, we evaluated this patient in Pavia. The spleen was palpable 3 cm under the costal margin, and laboratory data showed: Hb 15.4 g/dL, WBC count 3.9 × 109/L, and PLT vount 95 × 109/L. BM biopsy showed a 20% lymphoid infiltrate with interstitial and sinusoidal pattern, composed by small to medium sized cells with evident nucleoli, resembling pro-lymphocytes. By immunohistochemistry, cells were positive for CD20 and negative for CD5, CD23, cyclin-D1, CD25, DBA44, and annexin A1. Flow cytometry demonstrated the expression of CD20, FMC7 and CD11c, partial expression (25%) of CD103, and negativity for CD5, CD10, CD38, CD23, DBA44, CD11c and CD25. This patient was asymptomatic and a watch-and wait-policy was adopted. These findings indicate that the allele-specific PCR we developed is able to detect the mutation in the bone marrow of all patients with HCL, and confirm that the BRAF V600E mutation is highly specific for HCL within mature B-cell neoplasms. Only 2/177 (1.1%) patients with lymphoid neoplasms other than HCL (2/57 or 3.5% of patients with B-CLPD) were positive for BRAF V600E. This is in agreement with a previous study that found BRAF mutations in 2.4% of patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (Br J Cancer. 2003 Nov 17;89:1958–60). The detection of the BRAF V600E mutation in the clone (or, at least, in a subclone) of mature B-cell lymphoid neoplasms without typical HCL features might help to define their biology. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (20) ◽  
pp. 9511
Author(s):  
Elena Porumb-Andrese ◽  
Ramona Gabriela Ursu ◽  
Iuliu Ivanov ◽  
Irina-Draga Caruntu ◽  
Vlad Porumb ◽  
...  

Background: The prevalence of melanoma in Romanian patients is underestimated. There is a need to identify the BRAF V600E mutation to accurately treat patients with the newest approved BRAF inhibitor therapy. This is a pilot study in which we first aimed to choose the optimal DNA purification method from formalin fixation and paraffin embedding (FFPE) malignant melanoma skin samples to assess the BRAF mutation prevalence and correlate it with clinical pathological parameters. Methods: 30 FFPE samples were purified in parallel with two DNA extraction kits, a manual and a semi-automated kit. The extracted DNA in pure and optimum quantity was tested for the BRAF V600E mutation using the quantitative allele-specific amplification (quasa) method. quasa is a method for the sensitive detection of mutations that may be present in clinical samples at low levels. Results: The BRAF V600E mutation was detected in 60% (18/30) samples in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma of the skin. BRAFV600E mutation was equally distributed by gender and was associated with age >60, nodular melanoma, and trunk localization. Conclusions: The high prevalence of BRAF V600E mutations in our study group raises awareness for improvements to the national reporting system and initiation of the target therapy for patients with malignant melanoma of the skin.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5895-5895
Author(s):  
Gordon Ruan ◽  
Gaurav Goyal ◽  
Jithma P. Abeykoon ◽  
N. Nora Bennani ◽  
Karen Rech ◽  
...  

Introduction: The landmark VE-BASKET trial demonstrated that Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) patients with the BRAF-V600E mutation can be effectively treated with vemurafenib 1920 mg/day. However, all patients required dose reductions due to adverse effects. The efficacy of low dose BRAF-inhibitors is not well established in ECD. Further, as Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) also harbors BRAF-V600E mutations in 50-60% of patients, BRAF-inhibitors may be effective in this disease as well. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of low dose BRAF-inhibitors (vemurafenib and dabrafenib) in the treatment of ECD and LCH. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of ECD and LCH patients who were seen at our institution from January 1998 to July 2018. All patients had a diagnosis of ECD and LCH determined by clinical criteria in conjunction with histopathologic findings. Based on the standard doses approved for malignant melanoma and ECD, patients were categorized into the low dose BRAF-inhibitor group if they were treated with vemurafenib < 960 mg/day or dabrafenib ≤ 150mg/day at any point in time. We used a simple response criteria that defined clinical progressive disease (PD) as worsening of symptoms attributed to ECD/LCH or radiologic PD as a progression or worsening of proven or suspected lesions due to ECD/LCH. The minimum duration for symptom improvement to be considered a response was set at 3 months. Results: A total of 89 ECD patients and 186 LCH patients were identified. Within the ECD cohort, 24 of 44 (55%) patients who were tested had the BRAF-V600E mutation. Eight patients were included in the low dose BRAF-inhibitor group. The median age at diagnosis was 57 years (range 37-74) and 5 (63%) were male. The most common areas of involvement included bone (88%), cardiovascular system (63%), kidneys (63%), and brain parenchyma (50%). The median time of follow up was 66 months (range 23-165) and the median time on low-dose BRAF-inhibitor was 10 months (range 1-27) [Table 1]. Three patients had a starting dose of vemurafenib 1920 mg/day, 4 had 960 mg/day, and 1 had 480 mg/day. All patients required dose reductions and 50% of the patients ultimately discontinued vemurafenib due to side effects. Side effects included fatigue, pruritus, nausea, facial swelling, blisters, papillomas, and/or subcutaneous nodules. Four patients were able to remain on low-dose vemurafenib for a median follow up time of 24.5 months (range 12-28) with ongoing response and no signs of clinical or radiologic PD. Within the LCH cohort, 18 of 31 tested (58%) patients had the BRAF-V600E mutation. Four patients were included in the low dose BRAF-inhibitor group. The median age at diagnosis of this cohort was 43 years (range 34-69) and 2 (50%) were male. Areas of involvement included bone (100%), brain parenchyma (hypothalamus/optic stalk and pons; 50%), and skin (25%). The median time of follow up was 31 months (range 21-46) and the median time on low-dose BRAF-inhibitor was 4 months (range 3-24) [Table 2]. Two patients had a starting dose of vemurafenib 960mg/day. The patients with brain parenchymal involvement had a starting dose of dabrafenib 150mg/day or 100mg/day. All patients taking vemurafenib 960mg/day required dose reductions and one patient discontinued treatment due to skin blistering in her feet. In the patients taking dabrafenib, no side effects have yet been reported. 3 patients had an ongoing response and did not have clinical or radiologic PD. Patient #10 however, had clinical and radiologic PD after being on vemurafenib 720mg/day for 22 months. Conclusion: Our study suggests a potential role for lower doses of BRAF-inhibitors in ECD and LCH patients harboring BRAF-V600E mutations. Dabrafenib was found to be particularly efficacious and well-tolerated in LCH involving the brain parenchyma. However, patients who undergo dose reductions should be closely monitored due to the risk of disease progression. Careful balance of toxicities and efficacy is needed for optimizing patient outcomes with targeted therapies. Disclosures Bennani: Adicet Bio: Other: Advisory board; Kite Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Purdue Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Purdue Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board; Purdue Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Adicet Bio: Other: Advisory board; Kite Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Adicet Bio: Other: Advisory board; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board. OffLabel Disclosure: Vemurafenib and dabrafenib for Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Vemurafenib dosage for Erdheim-Chester disease is less than the approved dose of 960mg every 12 hours.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9074-9074
Author(s):  
Miguel F. Sanmamed ◽  
Sara Fernandez-Landazuri ◽  
Eduardo Castanon ◽  
Jose Echeveste ◽  
Maria D. Lozano ◽  
...  

9074 Background: MIA and S-100 have been proposed as tumor markers for patients with melanoma, but they are not widely accepted. BRAF V600E mutation has been reported in more than 50% of melanomas. Recently, selective BRAF inhibitors have proved to be more active than DTIC in first line treatment of BRAF V600E melanoma patients. The aim of the present work is to evaluate the utility of MIA and S-100 during iBRAF treatment. Methods: BRAF V600E mutation was analyzed in 77 patients with metastatic melanoma by automated direct sequencing in tumor DNA. Tumor markers (MIA, S-100 and LDH) were studied in serum from all patients. Sixteen of these patients received iBRAF therapy (11 Vemurafenib, 5 Dabrafenib) and tumor markers were analyzed sequentially: baseline, best response and progression. MIA and S-100 were determined by immunometric methods and LDH by a spectrophotometric assay. The cut-off points were MIA=9 ug/L, S-100=0.1 ug/L, and LDH=290 U/L. Non-parametric statistical analysis was performed. Results: Forty-three patients had BRAF V600E mutation and 34 were wild type (WT). The percentage of cases with MIA above the cut-off in patients with V600E mutation was significantly higher than in the WT group (76.3% vs. 52.9%; p<0.05), while the frequency of elevated S-100 and LDH was similar. Among patients treated with iBRAF, the response rate was 87.5% (5 CR, 9PR). In responding patients, MIA and S100 levels decreased dramatically, but not LDH (Table). At the time of this report, thirteen patients have progressed. Upon progression, MIA and S-100 increased significantly above levels achieved at best response (Table). Conclusions: Serum MIA and S-100 are potentially useful markers in the clinical and follow-up management of patients receiving iBRAF therapy. Validation in a larger series is needed. [Table: see text]


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8009-8009 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Planchard ◽  
Julien Mazieres ◽  
Gregory J. Riely ◽  
Charles M. Rudin ◽  
Fabrice Barlesi ◽  
...  

8009 Background: Activating BRAF V600E mutations in NSCLC are present in < 2% of tumors, primarily adenocarcinoma. The BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib has demonstrated clinical activity in BRAF V600 mutation–positive melanoma. Here we report interim efficacy and safety data obtained in 17 BRAF V600E–mutant NSCLC patients enrolled in dabrafenib phase II study BRF113928. Methods: Single-arm, 2-stage, phase II study in stage IV BRAF V600E mutation–positive NSCLC pts who failed at least 1 line of chemotherapy. Dabrafenib dosed at 150 mg orally twice daily. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 criteria. Results: The median age of the 17 pts was 69 years (range, 51-77 years). Most pts (12/17) were male, all were white with adenocarcinoma, and 13 were former smokers. All pts had failed at least 1 line of prior anticancer therapy, and 5 subjects had failed ≥ 2. At the time of reporting, 11 pts remain on therapy, and 6 have stopped therapy (5 with PD and 1 due to an AE). Thirteen pts were evaluable for efficacy. The best response for these pts included 7 PRs (5 confirmed PRs), 1 SD, and 4 PD; 1 pt discontinued due to an SAE (hypersensitivity reaction) prior to response assessment (ORR, 54%). The median duration of treatment for all 17 pts is approximately 9 weeks (range, 1-69 weeks). Among the 5 pts with confirmed PRs, duration of response was 29 and 49 weeks for the 2 pts who progressed, while the remaining 3 pts were responding for 6+ to 24+ weeks. The safety of dabrafenib in NSCLC pts appears to be generally consistent with what has been previously observed. The most common AEs were decreased appetite, fatigue, asthenia, dyspnea, and nausea, mostly grade 1 or 2. Five pts (29%) had a grade 3 AE, and 1 pt (6%) had a grade 4 SAE (hemorrhage). Conclusions: Dabrafenib shows early antitumor activity in BRAF V600E mutation–positive pretreated NSCLC pts, with an ORR of 54% and with the longest duration of response of 49 weeks thus far. Dabrafenib is generally well tolerated, and the study has met the minimum response rate (≥ 3 of first 20 pts) to continue into the second stage. This study represents the first clinical evidence of BRAF as a therapeutic target in NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT01336634.


2005 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 334-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Turner ◽  
Monib A. Zirvi ◽  
Francis Barany ◽  
Rosalie Elenitsas ◽  
John Seykora

2008 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 2876-2883 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. S.M. Smalley ◽  
M. Lioni ◽  
M. D. Palma ◽  
M. Xiao ◽  
B. Desai ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document