scholarly journals Evaluation of a visual tool co-developed for training hospital staff on the prevention and control of the spread of healthcare associated infections

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 105-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.S. Macdonald ◽  
C. Macduff ◽  
D. Loudon ◽  
S. Wan
2021 ◽  
pp. 175717742110358
Author(s):  
Sailesh Kumar Shrestha ◽  
Swarup Shrestha ◽  
Sisham Ingnam

Information on the burden of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and patterns of antibiotic use are prerequisites for infection prevention and control (IPC) and antibiotics stewardship programmes. However, a few studies have been reported from resource-limited settings and many of them have not used standard definitions to diagnose HAI precluding benchmarking with regional or international data. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of HAIs and antibiotic use in our centre. We conducted a point prevalence survey in a 350-bed university hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal in April 2019. We reviewed all patients aged ⩾ 18 years admitted to the hospital for at least two calendar days and evaluated for the three common HAIs—pneumonia, urinary tract infection and surgical site infection. We used the clinical criteria by the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control to diagnose the HAIs. We also collected information on the antibiotics used. Of 160 eligible patients, 18 (11.25%) had HAIs and 114 (87.5%) were on antibiotics, with more than half of them (61/114 patients, 53.5%) receiving two or more antibiotics. This highlights the need for effective implementation of IPC as well as antibiotics stewardship programmes in our centre.


BMJ ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. j3768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soumya Swaminathan ◽  
Jagdish Prasad ◽  
Akshay C Dhariwal ◽  
Randeep Guleria ◽  
Mahesh C Misra ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 239-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irena Klavs ◽  
Jana Kolman ◽  
Tatjana Lejko Zupanc ◽  
Božena Kotnik Kevorkijan ◽  
Aleš Korošec ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction In the second Slovenian national healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) prevalence survey, conducted within the European point prevalence survey of HAIs and antimicrobial use in acute-care hospitals, we estimated the prevalence of all types of HAIs and identified risk factors. Methods Patients from acute-care hospitals were enrolled into a one-day cross-sectional study in October 2011. Descriptive analyses were performed to describe the characteristics of patients, their exposure to invasive procedures and the prevalence of different types of HAIs. Univariate and multivariate analyses of association of having at least one HAI with possible risk factors were performed to identify risk factors. Results Among 5628 patients, 3.8% had at least one HAI and additional 2.6% were still being treated for HAIs on the day of the survey; the prevalence of HAIs was 6.4%. The prevalence of urinary tract infections was the highest (1.4%), followed by pneumoniae (1.3%) and surgical site infections (1.2%). In intensive care units (ICUs), the prevalence of patients with at least one HAI was 35.7%. Risk factors for HAIs included central vascular catheter (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.0; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 2.9-5.7), peripheral vascular catheter (aOR 2.0; 95% CI: 1.5-2.6), intubation (aOR 2.3; 95% CI: 1.4-3.5) and rapidly fatal underlying condition (aOR 2.1; 95% CI: 1.4-3.3). Conclusions The prevalence of HAIs in Slovenian acute-care hospitals in 2011 was substantial, especially in ICUs. HAIs prevention and control is an important public health priority. National surveillance of HAIs in ICUs should be developed to support evidence-based prevention and control.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
V Bordino ◽  
C Vicentini ◽  
A D'Ambrosio ◽  
F Quattrocolo ◽  
C M Zotti

Abstract Background Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) significantly increase adverse clinical outcomes and healthcare costs. In 2016 Italy participated in the second European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) Point Prevalence Survey (PPS) of HAIs and antimicrobial use in acute care hospitals. The aim of this study was to estimate the burden of the 5 most common HAIs in Italy, by evaluating incidence, attributable deaths, Years of Life Lost (YLL), Years Lived with Disability (YLD) and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years (DALYs). Methods National PPS data were used to establish sex- and age-specific incidence of Healthcare-associated Pneumonia (HAP), HA Urinary tract infections (HA UTI), HA Bloodstream Infections (HA BSI) excluding neonatal BSI, Surgical Site Infections (SSI), HA Clostridium Difficile infections (HA CDI). Patients' life expectancy was adjusted according to the severity of underlying conditions using the McCabe score. Following the methodology from the Burden of Communicable Diseases in Europe (BCoDE)-project, an adapted version of the disease models of the BCoDE toolkit was used. Results An overall yearly incidence of 643434 new cases of HAI in Italy was estimated. The aggregate burden of the 5 HAIs was 426411.98 DALYs (86731.03 YLD + 339680.96 YLL), corresponding to 702.53 DALYs per 100000 total population. HA BSI and HAP had the highest burden with respectively 253868.22? and 126038.26 DALYs. The population strata with the highest burden were the ones with McCabe Score 1 for every considered HAI. The age groups with the highest burden were 70-74 for male and 45-49 for female patients. In total, 56% of DALYs were attributable to men and 44% to women. Conclusions This nation-wide study found a significant burden of disease due to HAIs in Italy. Results of this study could be used to guide policy-makers in the implementation of measures aiming to reduce the impact of HAIs. Key messages This study estimated the burden of 5 HAIs in Italy was 426411.98 DALYs (86731.03 YLD + 339680.96 YLL according to 2016 PPS data. Considering the significant burden of HAIs found in this study, infection prevention and control measures should be a Public Health priority in Italy.


2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (51) ◽  
Author(s):  

The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) is inviting applications for the position of: Senior Expert for Respiratory Diseases in the Surveillance Unit Expert in Surveillance Unit – Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare-associated Infections


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Tchouaket ◽  
Stephanie Robins ◽  
Sandra Boivin ◽  
Drissa Sia ◽  
Kelley Kilpatrick ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) present a major public health problem that significantly affects patients, health care providers and the entire healthcare system. Infection prevention and control programs limit HCAIs and are an indispensable component of patient and healthcare worker safety. The clinical best practices (CBPs) of handwashing, screening, hygiene and sanitation of surfaces and equipment, and basic and additional precautions are keystones of infection prevention and control (IPC). Systematic reviews of IPC economic evaluations report the lack of rigorous empirical evidence demonstrating the cost-benefit of IPC program in general, and point to the lack of assessment of the value of investing in CBPs more specifically. Objective This study aims to assess overall costs associated with each of the four CBPs. Methods Across two Quebec hospitals, 48 healthcare workers were observed for two hours each shift, for two consecutive weeks. A modified time-driven activity-based costing framework method was used to capture all human resources (time) and materials required (e.g. masks, cloths, disinfectants) for each clinical best practice. Using a hospital perspective with a time horizon of one year, median costs per CBP per hour, as well as the cost per action, were calculated and reported in 2018 Canadian dollars. Sensitivity analyses were performed. Results A total of 1831 actions were recorded. The median cost of hand hygiene (N = 867) was 19.6 cents per action. For cleaning and disinfection of surfaces (N = 102), the cost was 21.4 cents per action, while cleaning of small equipment (N = 85) was 25.3 cents per action. Additional precautions median cost was $4.13 per action. The donning or removing or personal protective equipment (N = 720) cost was 75.9 cents per action. Finally, the total median costs for the five categories of clinical best practiced assessed were 27.2 cents per action. Conclusion The costs of clinical best practices were low, from 20 cents to $4.13 per action. This study provides evidence based arguments with which to support the allocation of resources to infection prevention and control practices that directly affect the safety of patients, healthcare workers and the public. Further research of costing clinical best care practices is warranted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document