Geometry interventions for K-12 students with and without disabilities: A research synthesis

2016 ◽  
Vol 80 ◽  
pp. 134-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carly Bergstrom ◽  
Dake Zhang
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (Sp.Issue) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorin W. Anderson

Distance education has been practised for generations, although its purpose and form have changed. Correspondence courses, in which students receive instruction via mail and respond with assignments or questions to the instructor, date back to the mid-1800s, if not earlier. As technology changed, so did the nature of distance education. Radio, television, computers, and, most recently, the internet have supported distance education over the years. Research studies on the use and effectiveness of distance education focus almost exclusively on higher education. A recent research synthesis suggests that fewer than five per cent of the studies have addressed K-12 education. The Covid-19 pandemic, however, has brought distance education into K-12 schools and classrooms. Distance education in the Covid-19 era has been referred to as ‘emergency remote teaching’ (ERT) because, with little research on which to rely, teachers must improvise quick solutions under less-than-ideal circumstances, a situation that causes many teachers to experience stress. The purpose of this paper is to address five fundamental questions. First, what problems have K-12 school administrators and teachers faced in implementing ERT? Second, under what conditions has ERT been effective since the advent of the Covid-19 pandemic? Third, what are the strengths of ERT in K-12 schools and classrooms? Fourth, what are the weaknesses of ERT in K-12 schools and classrooms? Fifth, to what extent will lessons learned from ERT influence teaching and learning when the pandemic abates? The paper concludes with a brief set of recommendations. Throughout the paper, the focus is on K-12 education.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priyanka Agarwal

Over the last half century, research on gender has consistently debunked male superiority in mathematics. Yet, negation of children and youth on the basis of gender (and race) continue to occur in mathematics education. Scholars have increasingly focused on theorizing and examining ways to make mathematics classrooms more gender-inclusive. In this paper we synthesize prior studies from the lens of gender equity as a form of epistemic justice (Fricker, 2007). We argue that achieving epistemic justice requires an ecological research that seeks the interrelations of micro, meso, and macro levels of inequality and privilege (Weis & Fine, 2012). Together, these constructs lay the groundwork for mathematics education research to understand how do individuals and institutions negotiate, resist, or disrupt epistemic injustice in mathematics education, as established by heteropatriarchy and Whiteness? We identify six emergent themes that speak to the guiding question while highlighting nuances and complexities of studying gender equity in mathematics education. We conclude with a discussion of implications and future directions for research.


2020 ◽  
Vol 228 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Michael Bošnjak ◽  
Nadine Wedderhoff

Abstract. This editorial gives a brief introduction to the six articles included in the fourth “Hotspots in Psychology” of the Zeitschrift für Psychologie. The format is devoted to systematic reviews and meta-analyses in research-active fields that have generated a considerable number of primary studies. The common denominator is the research synthesis nature of the included articles, and not a specific psychological topic or theme that all articles have to address. Moreover, methodological advances in research synthesis methods relevant for any subfield of psychology are being addressed. Comprehensive supplemental material to the articles can be found in PsychArchives ( https://www.psycharchives.org ).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document