A systematic scoping review and textual narrative synthesis of the qualitative evidence related to adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Author(s):  
Ryan Essex ◽  
Gemma Bruce ◽  
Molly Dibley ◽  
Paul Newton ◽  
Trevor Thompson ◽  
...  
BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. e032865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maciej Płaszewski ◽  
Weronika Grantham ◽  
Ejgil Jespersen

IntroductionAdolescent idiopathic scoliosis, the diagnosis and management of this condition, may lead to poorer body image and diminished psychosocial functioning. Furthermore, treatment, especially bracing and surgery as well as screening, remain controversial and debated, with an unclear evidence base. Personal experiences in terms of issues such as person-centred care, shared decision making, and patient and public involvement, are contemporarily recognised as highly valued. Nonetheless, people’s experiences related to adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is an issue underrepresented in current systematic reviews and systematically developed recommendations. There appears a substantial imbalance between a vast amount of biomedical research reports, and sporadic biopsychosocial publications in this field. The objective of this planned scoping review is to explore and map the available evidence from various sources to address a broad question of what is known about experiences of all those touched, directly and indirectly, by the problem of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.Methods and analysisWe based our protocol on the Joanna Briggs Institute’s scoping review method, including the Population – Concept – Context framework, to formulate the objectives, research questions, eligibility criteria and conduct characteristics of the study. We will consider any primary study designs, research synthesis reports, as well as narrative reviews and opinion pieces. We will not restrict eligible publications to English language. Search and selection processes will include academic and grey literature searches using multiple electronic databases, search engines and websites, hand searches, and contacting the authors. We will use a customised data charting table and present a narrative synthesis of the results.Ethics and disseminationScoping review is a secondary study, aiming at synthesising data from publicly available publications, hence it does not require ethical approval. We will submit the report to a peer-reviewed journal and disseminate it among professionals involved in scoliosis management, guideline and recommendation development, and policymaking.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edyta Matusik ◽  
Jacek Durmala ◽  
Magdalena Olszanecka-Glinianowicz ◽  
Jerzy Chudek ◽  
Pawel Matusik

Author(s):  
Gideon W Blumstein ◽  
Lindsay Andras ◽  
Austin E. Sanders ◽  
Alexander Broom ◽  
Paul D. Choi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document