scholarly journals Reducing Patient Safety Risk with the Implementation of Global Process Improvement Program across a Multi-Site Large Teaching Institution

Author(s):  
T.R. Meier ◽  
J.H. Suh ◽  
M.A. Weller ◽  
A.D. Vassil ◽  
D. LaHurd ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Banks ◽  
Richard Brown ◽  
Alex Laslowski ◽  
Yvonne Daniels ◽  
Phil Branton ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus G. Nether ◽  
Eric J. Thomas ◽  
Amir Khan ◽  
Madelene J. Ottosen ◽  
Lauren Yager

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 111
Author(s):  
Elly Numa Zahroti

Background: Patient safety is an indicator of hospital service quality. A hospital in Surabaya identified six indicators of patient safety goals. There are two indicators which can not achieve the standard, namely effective communication and infection risk reduction.Aims: This study aims to identify the process improvement that can be done to increase indicator performance by using PDSA cycle.Method: A descriptive observational design was used in this study with a case study and participatory approach. There were 5 subjects selected by purposive sampling. Interview and observation were used to collect data that then were analyzed descriptively. The validity of data was done by triangulation of method, source, and theory.Results: The PDSA results indicated that the cause of the poor indicators performance of both patient safety goals is the poor compliance of the health staffs in carrying out read-back procedure and hand hygiene as written in SOP. It was caused by the lack of knowledge and motivation of the health staffs in implementing the SOP.Conclusion: In conclusion, process improvement can be done by socializing read-back SOP and hand hygiene as well as supervision conducted periodically by managers. Plan stage is one step which should be improved. Commitment in implementing the improvement planning is necessary. In addition, further research on factors that influence compliance should be conducted.Keywords: patient safety, PDSA method, process improvement, quality of hospital


2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 4321-4328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Bozzay ◽  
Matthew Bradley ◽  
Angela Kindvall ◽  
Ashley Humphries ◽  
Elliot Jessie ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chantal Backman ◽  
Paul C. Hebert ◽  
Alison Jennings ◽  
David Neilipovitz ◽  
Omar Choudhri ◽  
...  

Purpose Patient safety remains a top priority in healthcare. Many organizations have developed systems to monitor and prevent harm, and have invested in different approaches to quality improvement. Despite these organizational efforts to better detect adverse events, efficient resolution of safety problems remains a significant challenge. The authors developed and implemented a comprehensive multimodal patient safety improvement program called SafetyLEAP. The term “LEAP” is an acronym that highlights the three facets of the program including: a Leadership and Engagement approach; Audit and feedback; and a Planned improvement intervention. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the implementation of the SafetyLEAP program in the intensive care units (ICUs) of three large hospitals. Design/methodology/approach A comparative case study approach was used to compare and contrast the adherence to each component of the SafetyLEAP program. The study was conducted using a convenience sample of three (n=3) ICUs from two provinces. Two reviewers independently evaluated major adherence metrics of the SafetyLEAP program for their completeness. Analysis was performed for each individual case, and across cases. Findings A total of 257 patients were included in the study. Overall, the proportion of the SafetyLEAP tasks completed was 64.47, 100, and 26.32 percent, respectively. ICU nos 1 and 2 were able to identify opportunities for improvement, follow a quality improvement process and demonstrate positive changes in patient safety. The main factors influencing adherence were the engagement of a local champion, competing priorities, and the identification of appropriate resources. Practical implications The SafetyLEAP program allowed for the identification of processes that could result in patient harm in the ICUs. However, the success in improving patient safety was dependent on the engagement of the care teams. Originality/value The authors developed an evidence-based approach to systematically and prospectively detect, improve, and evaluate actions related to patient safety.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 182-191
Author(s):  
Jennifer Browne ◽  
Carrie Jo Braden

Background Increased nursing workload can be associated with decreased patient safety and quality of care. The associations between nursing workload, quality of care, and patient safety are not well understood. Objectives The concept of workload and its associated measures do not capture all nursing work activities, and tools used to assess healthy work environments do not identify these activities. The variable turbulence was created to capture nursing activities not represented by workload. The purpose of this research was to specify a definition and preliminary measure for turbulence. Methods A 2-phase exploratory sequential mixed-methods design was used to translate the proposed construct of turbulence into an operational definition and begin preliminary testing of a turbulence scale. Results A member survey of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses resulted in the identification of 12 turbulence types. Turbulence was defined, and reliability of the turbulence scale was acceptable (α = .75). Turbulence was most strongly correlated with patient safety risk (r = 0.41, n = 293, P < .001). Workload had the weakest association with patient safety risk (r = 0.16, n = 294, P = .005). Conclusions Acknowledging the concepts of turbulence and workload separately best describes the full range of nursing demands. Improved measurement of nursing work is important to advance the science. A clearer understanding of nurses’ work will enhance our ability to target resources and improve patients’ outcomes.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaurav Sharma ◽  
Anuj Dixit ◽  
Swapnil Awasthi ◽  
Garima Sharma

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e000303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Bradley ◽  
Angela Kindvall ◽  
Judy Logan ◽  
Jeffrey Bailey ◽  
Eric Elster ◽  
...  

BackgroundA key component of a process improvement program is the institution of hospital-specific protocols to address certain disparities and streamline patient care. In that regard, we evaluated the implementation of an outpatient laparoscopic appendectomy (OLA) protocol at a tertiary military hospital. We hypothesized that OLA would reduce length of stay (LOS) without increasing complications.MethodsIn August 2016, our institution implemented an OLA protocol—defined as discharge within 24 hours of surgery. Exclusion criteria included age <18 years old, grade 4 or 5 appendicitis, immunosuppression, current pregnancy, and no supervision during the first 24 hours postdischarge. To determine OLA’s effect on LOS, analysis of variance was used to perform a comparison between the years 2014 and 2017. Successful outpatient appendectomies were recorded preprotocol and postprotocol, as well as readmission complications.ResultsIn 2017, the first full year of protocol implementation, 44 of 59 (75%) patients met the inclusion criteria, and all but 2 (42 of 44, 95%) stayed for less than 24 hours. Of the two outliers, one developed acute on chronic kidney disease and one had a slow return of bowel function following grade 3 appendicitis. Complications were low across all years (one per year). In 2017, the readmission was for percutaneous drainage of an abscess. Overall, protocol implementation produced a significant decrease in LOS.DiscussionOLA protocol decreased LOS at a military hospital and should be expanded to other department of defense (DoD) facilities. Further research is needed to identify cost benefit to the military health system.Level of evidenceIII.


2004 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 20-21
Author(s):  
Donna Vanderpool

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document