scholarly journals Peer review report 2 on “Clinical impact of small advanced gastric cancer (≤ 40 mm) in elderly patients”

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 454
2017 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 131-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshitake Ueda ◽  
Hajime Fujishima ◽  
Teijiro Hirashita ◽  
Hidefumi Shiroshita ◽  
Tsuyoshi Etoh ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Norio Shiraishi ◽  
Hajime Fujishima ◽  
Hidefumi Shiroshita ◽  
Masafumi Inomata ◽  
Norio Shiraishi ◽  
...  

Background: Little is known about the clinicopathological findings in elderly patients with undifferentiated advanced gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to clarify the clinical impact of clinicopathological characteristics of those cancers in elderly patients. Method: A total of 42 patients aged 80 years or older with advanced gastric cancer who had undergone curative gastrectomy between 1998 and 2015 were included in this study. All patients were classified into two principal subgroups based on histology: undifferentiated group and differentiated group. The two groups were examined and compared with respect to the pathological findings and clinical outcomes. Results: Of the 47 patients, 23 (49%) patients were in the undifferentiated group and 24 (51%) were in the differentiated group. The undifferentiated cancer was less frequently located in the upper third of the stomach than the differentiated cancer (4% vs 42%, P < 0.01). The frequency of the cancer with depth of T4a was higher in the undifferentiated group than in the differentiated group (48% vs. 17%, P < 0.05). The median number of metastatic lymph nodes in the undifferentiated group was more than that in the differentiated group (3 vs. 1, P < 0.05). In short- and long-term outcome after curative gastrectomy, there were no differences between the two groups. Conclusion: In elderly patients, undifferentiated advanced gastric cancer may have more malignant potential than differentiated cancer. However, by curative gastrectomy, the elderly patients with undifferentiated advanced gastric cancer can be obtained the equivalent clinical outcome to those with differentiated cancer.


2014 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. ii39
Author(s):  
Iwasa Satoru ◽  
Hamaguchi Tetsuya ◽  
Nagashima Kengo ◽  
Goto Masahiro ◽  
Okazaki Shunsuke ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 418-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Graziano ◽  
V Catalano ◽  
P Lorenzini ◽  
E Giacomini ◽  
D Sarti ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omer Yalkin ◽  
Nidal Iflazoglu ◽  
Olgun Deniz ◽  
Mustafa Yener Uzunoglu ◽  
Ezgi Isil Turhan

Abstract Objective: The aim of this study was to clarify the prognostic value of the pathological lymph node ratio for elderly and non-elderly gastric cancer patients and to evaluate whether there is a difference in the survival of patients with the same LNR (Lymph Node Ratio).Materials and Methods: A total of 222 patients diagnosed with locally advanced gastric cancer and who underwent gastrectomy were included. The patients were divided into two groups according to age. Clinicopathological properties of the two groups were compared. Potential prognostic factors affecting survival were analyzed. Subsequently, the effect of lymphadenectomy and LNR on survival in both groups was evaluated. Results: Significant differences were detected in terms of the location of primary lesions, hemoglobin and albumin levels between elderly patients and non-elderly patients (p < .05). Overall survival (OS) was significantly worse in elderly patients (22 months vs. 67 months, p<0.001). The survival rates in elderly patients were significantly lower from those of non-elderly in the subgroup LNR Stage 2 (12.1% vs. 47.9 %, P = 0.004) and LNR Stage 3 classification (9.1% vs. 34.1%, P = 0.039). LNR was found to be significant for OS with a cut-off point of 0.18. Conclusion: A survival difference was found between the elderly and non-elderly patients with the same LNR. LNR was found to be an independent factor for survival especially in elderly patients. Survival was found to be further decreased in elderly patients compared to non-elderly patients with increasing LNR.


2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (7) ◽  
pp. 2332-2339
Author(s):  
Yuki Ushimaru ◽  
Yukinori Kurokawa ◽  
Tsuyoshi Takahashi ◽  
Takuro Saito ◽  
Kotaro Yamashita ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. ix229
Author(s):  
D. Egamberdiev ◽  
M. Djuraev ◽  
S. Khudayorov ◽  
O. Nematov ◽  
A. Babaev ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document