Longer-term outcome of treatment resistant depression after specialist, multimodal, inpatient treatment: A prospective follow up study

2010 ◽  
Vol 122 ◽  
pp. S53
Author(s):  
S.C. Wooderson ◽  
A. Fekadu ◽  
M.F. Juruena ◽  
L.J. Rane ◽  
K. Markopoulou ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 201 (5) ◽  
pp. 369-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abebaw Fekadu ◽  
Lena J. Rane ◽  
Sarah C. Wooderson ◽  
Kalypso Markopoulou ◽  
Lucia Poon ◽  
...  

BackgroundSystematic studies on the outcome of treatment-resistant depression are scarce.AimsTo describe the longer-term outcome and predictors of outcome in treatment-resistant depression.MethodOut of 150 patients approached, 118 participants with confirmed treatment-resistant depression (unipolar, n= 7; bipolar, n=27; secondary, n=14) treated in a specialist in-patient centre were followed-up for between 8 and 84 months (mean=39, s.d.=22).ResultsThe majority of participants attained full remission (60.2%), most of whom (48.3% of total sample) showed sustained recovery (full remission for at least 6 months). A substantial minority had persistent subsyndromal depression (19.5%) or persistent depressive episode (20.3%). Diagnosis of bipolar treatment-resistant depression and poorer social support were associated with early relapse, whereas strong social support, higher educational status and milder level of treatment resistance measured with the Maudsley Staging Method were associated with achieving quicker remission. Exploratory analysis of treatment found positive associations between treatment with a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOl) in unipolar treatment-resistant depression and attaining remission at discharge and at final follow-up, and duloxetine use predicted attainment of remission at final follow-up.ConclusionsAlthough many patients with treatment-resistant depression experience persistent symptomatology even after intensive, specialist treatment, most can achieve remission. The choice of treatment and presence of good social support may affect remission rates, whereas those with low social support and a bipolar diathesis should be considered at higher risk of early relapse. We suggest that future work to improve the long-term outcome in this disabling form of depression might focus on social interventions to improve support, and the role of neglected pharmacological interventions such as MAOIs.


2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Per Bech ◽  
Lone Lindberg ◽  
Birgit Straasø ◽  
Erik Roj Larsen

ObjectiveWe have made a 2-year follow-up study to evaluate the effect of repeated transcranial pulsating electromagnetic fields (T-PEMF) augmentation in patients who had achieved remission but later on relapsed, as well as to identify factors contributing to treatment-resistant depression in patients who did not respond to T-PEMF.MethodsUsing the Longitudinal Expert Assessment of All Data approach the patients were classified in four groups: A: patients who achieved remission; B: patients with doubtful effect; C: patients with no effect; and D: patients who were hard-to-assess.ResultsIn group A, comprising 27 patients, 13 had relapsed; they obtained a clear remission after a repeated course of T-PEMF augmentation. In group D, comprising 16 patients, we identified misdiagnostic factors both concerning the event of remission after the previous T-PEMF augmentation and concerning the aetiology (psychosocial stressors and co-morbid conditions). Compared with the other groups, the group D patients had a smaller number of previous episodes (p=0.09) and a longer duration of the current episode (p=0.01).ConclusionT-PEMF has an effect among patients who relapsed after remission with the first series of T-PEMF. Treatment-resistant depression is a condition that has a high degree of multivariate problems. Misuse of alcohol or drugs, severe somatic disorders and other psychosocial problems may need other kinds of treatment before T-PEMF augmentation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. e58-e60 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Trottier-Duclos ◽  
Véronique Desbeaumes Jodoin ◽  
Marie-Pierre Fournier-Gosselin ◽  
François Richer ◽  
Nathalie Desjardins ◽  
...  

BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S334-S334
Author(s):  
Timothy Ming ◽  
Tom Denee ◽  
Gemma Scott ◽  
Joachim Morrens ◽  
Christopher Weatherburn

AimsTo assess the incidence and treatments currently used in clinical practice for the treatment of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in Scotland.BackgroundPatients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who have not responded to at least two successive antidepressant (AD) treatments in a single episode are described as having Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD). Epidemiological data on TRD in Scotland is lacking. Furthermore, there is no data to our knowledge on therapies prescribed in Scottish clinical practice to treat TRD.MethodA retrospective, longitudinal cohort study was conducted using Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) medical records. Adult patients were indexed on AD prescription, requiring MDD diagnosis within 90 days, from Jan 2011-May 2018 with 360-day baseline and 180-day minimum follow-up periods. Failure of ≥2 adequate oral AD regimens following indexing constituted TRD classification. Incidence rates of MDD and TRD (within the MDD cohort) and treatment lines following TRD classification were derived.ResultThe analysis included 20,059 patients with MDD (mean age 44 years, 63% female, median follow-up 59 months); 1,374 (6.8%) were classified as TRD. Median time-to-TRD classification was 25 months. The incidence rate of MDD was 15.9 per 1,000 patient-years and for TRD was 14.7 per 1,000 MDD-patient-years. For all first four post-TRD treatment lines, SSRI monotherapy was the most commonly prescribed therapy, followed by combination (dual/triple) therapy and augmentation therapy (at least one oral AD supplemented with lithium, an antipsychotic or an anticonvulsant therapy). At first-line of TRD treatment, 1,050 (76.4%) patients received monotherapy AD, 212 (15.4%) received combination AD therapy and 112 (8.2%) received augmentation therapy. The most common monotherapy treatments at first-line TRD were sertraline (15.6%), mirtazapine (13.8%), fluoxetine (12.2%) and venlafaxine (11.6%). Among combination therapies, mirtazapine, venlafaxine, sertraline and amitriptyline were frequently used. Among the TRD and MDD cohort, no somatic treatments were coded in CPRD, although the use of these treatments was likely underestimated.ConclusionMonotherapy AD treatment was the most common therapy type for all four post-TRD treatment lines. These data support the need for new treatments that can achieve and maintain therapeutic response, and avoid continuous cycling through similar AD therapies.This study was sponsored by Janssen Cilag Ltd.


2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 365-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoine Yrondi ◽  
Bruno Aouizerate ◽  
Djamila Bennabi ◽  
Raphaëlle Richieri ◽  
Thierry D'Amato ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 168 (5) ◽  
pp. 502-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sidney H. Kennedy ◽  
Peter Giacobbe ◽  
Sakina J. Rizvi ◽  
Franca M. Placenza ◽  
Yasunori Nishikawa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document