Transdiagnostic and Functional Predictors of Depression Severity and Trajectory in the Penn State Psychiatry Clinical Assessment and Rating Evaluation System (PCARES) Registry

Author(s):  
Hassaan Gomaa ◽  
Ritika Baweja ◽  
Dahlia Mukherjee ◽  
Fan He ◽  
Amanda M. Pearl ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Eric Q.D. Trinh ◽  
J. Eric Vance ◽  
Lindsay A. Maguire ◽  
Shaily Amin ◽  
Tricia M. Lemelle

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ursula Ødum Brinck-Claussen ◽  
Nadja Kehler Curth ◽  
Kaj Sparle Christensen ◽  
Annette Sofie Davidsen ◽  
John Hagel Mikkelsen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Methods to enhance the accuracy of the depression diagnosis continues to be of relevance to clinicians. The primary aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic precision of two different diagnostic strategies using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) as a reference standard. A secondary aim was to evaluate accordance between depression severity found via MINI and mean Major Depression Inventory (MDI) sum-scores presented at referral. Methods This study was a two-armed, cluster-randomized superiority trial embedded in the Collabri trials investigating collaborative care in Danish general practices. GPs performing case-finding were instructed always to use MDI when suspecting depression. GPs performing usual clinical assessment were instructed to detect depression as they would normally do. According to guidelines, GPs would use MDI if they had a clinical suspicion, and patients responded positively to two or three core symptoms of depression. We compared the positive predictive value (PPV) in the two groups. Results Fifty-one GP clusters were randomized. In total, 244 participants were recruited in the case-finding group from a total of 19 GP clusters, and 256 participants were recruited in the usual clinical assessment group from a total of 19 GP clusters. The PPV of the GP diagnosis, when based on case-finding, was 0.83 (95% CI 0.78–0.88) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.89–0.96) when based on usual clinical assessment. The mean MDI sum-scores for each depression severity group indicated higher scores than suggested cut-offs. Conclusions In this trial, systematic use of MDI on clinical suspicion of depression did not improve the diagnostic precision compared with the usual clinical assessment of depression. Trial registration The trial was retrospectively registered on 07/02/2016 at ClinicalTrials.gov. No. NCT02678845.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. e0255995
Author(s):  
Chotiman Chinvararak ◽  
Pantri Kirdchok ◽  
Peeraphon Lueboonthavatchai

Objective We aimed to study attachment patterns and their association with depression severity in Thai depressed patients. Method We conducted a descriptive study of depressed participants at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital from November 2013 to April 2014. The Thai Short Version of Revised Experience of Close Relationships Questionnaire and the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) were administered to all participants. We assessed BDI-II scores, classified by attachment patterns, using one-way analyses of variance. The associated factors and predictors of depression severity were analysed by chi-square and logistic regression analyses, respectively. Results A total of 180 participants (75% female; mean age = 45.2 ± 14.3 years) were recruited. Dismissing attachment was the most common pattern in Thai depressed patients (36.1%). Depressed patients with preoccupied attachment demonstrated the highest BDI-II scores. The best predictor of moderate to severe depression severity was preoccupied/fearful attachment (odds ratio = 3.68; 95% confidence interval = 2.05–7.30). Conclusions Anxious attachment was found to be associated with higher depression severity. Preoccupied/fearful attachment was the predictor of moderate to severe depression severity.


2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek Richards ◽  
Thomas Richardson ◽  
Ladislav Timulak ◽  
Noemi Viganò ◽  
Jacqueline Mooney ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 143 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Radha Dhingra ◽  
Fan He ◽  
Erika F Saunders ◽  
Daniel A Waschbusch ◽  
Amanda M Pearl ◽  
...  

Objective: To understand the burden of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in a psychiatric outpatient population. Methods: We used baseline data from the ongoing Penn State Psychiatry Clinical Assessment and Rating Evaluation System (PCARES) Registry, which is comprised of adult patients who were seen at a psychiatric outpatient clinic affiliated with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health and the Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center. The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data from 3,024 patients who sought psychiatric care between 02/17/2015 and 09/18/2019 were included in this report. We compared the prevalence of CVDs and the mean levels of major CVD risk factors in our sample with that reported in the 2013-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Results: The mean age of the study population was 42.7 (16.7) years, with 63% female and 85% Caucasians. The most common psychiatric diagnoses at baseline were Major Depressive Disorder [ICD-10: F32 & F33] (45%), Generalized Anxiety Disorder [ICD-10: F41.1] (20%), and Bipolar Disorder [ICD-10: F31] (12%). Eighteen percent of patients reported using tobacco products and 1.7% reported using alcohol. The prevalence (%) of CVDs, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia in our sample were 9.1, 20, 48, and 41%, respectively (all significantly higher than the NHANES reports, all p < 0.0001). The baseline means (mg/dl) of total cholesterol (C), LDL-C, HDL-C, and triglycerides (TG) were 186, 108, 48, and 156, respectively (all are significantly lower than that reported from the NHANES, except for TG, which was higher than that of the NHANES, all p < 0.0001), while 22% of all patients had prescriptions for lipid-lowering medications. Baseline mean level of glucose and HbA1C were 111 mg/dl and 6.2% (both significantly higher than that from the NHANES, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: In this systematic registry of psychiatric outpatients from a mid-Atlantic academic medical center, the baseline CVD burden as measured by common cardiovascular diseases, comorbidities and risk factors are significantly higher than the CVD burden in the general US population. Considering that the mean age of this patient population is 5 years younger than that of the NHANES population, our data underscores the need for control and prevention of CVD in patients with psychiatric conditions, and suggests the potential of integrating mental and physical health care in this type of special population.


Kardiologiia ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 1_2015 ◽  
pp. 9-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.E. Golimbet Golimbet ◽  
B.A. Volel Volel ◽  
F.Yu. Kopylov Kopylov ◽  
A.V. Dolzhikov Dolzhikov ◽  
G.I. Korovaitseva Korovaitseva ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela M. Benavides ◽  
Jacob A. Finn ◽  
Xinyu Tang ◽  
Susan Ropacki ◽  
Racine M. Brown ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 586-593
Author(s):  
Yoshinobu Matsuda ◽  
Hitoshi Tanimukai ◽  
Shinichiro Inoue ◽  
Shuji Inada ◽  
Koji Sugano ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The Japanese Psycho-Oncology Society and Japanese Association of Supportive Care in Cancer recently launched the clinical practice guidelines for delirium in adult cancer patients. The aim of the guidelines was to provide evidence-based recommendations for the clinical assessment and management of delirium in cancer patients. This article reports the process of developing the guideline and summarizes the recommendations made. Methods The guidelines were developed in accordance with the Medical Information Network Distribution Service creation procedures. The guideline development group, consisting of multidisciplinary members, formulated nine clinical questions. A systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant articles published prior to through 31 May 2016. Each article was reviewed by two independent reviewers. The level of evidence and the strength of the recommendations were graded using the grading system developed by the Medical Information Network Distribution Service, following the concept of The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. The modified Delphi method was used to validate the recommendation statements. Results This article provides a summary of the recommendations with rationales for each, as well as a short summary. Conclusions These guidelines will support the clinical assessment and management of delirium in cancer patients. However, additional clinical studies are warranted to further improve the management of delirium.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document