scholarly journals The role of Ayurveda management in preventing surgical site infections instead of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 263-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subhash Yadav ◽  
Sanjay Jain ◽  
Jatinder Chaudhary ◽  
Rahul Bansal ◽  
Manoj Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis

Reduction in Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis Expenditure and the Rate of Surgical Site Infection by Means of a Protocol That Controls the Use of Prophylaxis

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 1358-1365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marisa I. Gómez ◽  
Silvia I. Acosta-Gnass ◽  
Luisa Mosqueda-Barboza ◽  
Juan A Basualdo
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Final Stage ◽  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Prospective Survey ◽  
Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

Objective.To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention based on training and the use of a protocol with an automatic stop of antimicrobial prophylaxis to improve hospital compliance with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines.Design.An interventional study with a before-after trial was conducted in 3 stages: a 3-year initial stage (January 1999 to December 2001), during which a descriptive-prospective survey was performed to evaluate surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis and surgical site infections; a 6-month second stage (January to June 2002), during which an educational intervention was performed regarding the routine use of a surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis request form that included an automatic stop of prophylaxis (the “automatic-stop prophylaxis form”); and a 3-year final stage (July 2002 to June 2005), during which a descriptive-prospective survey of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis and surgical site infections was again performed.Setting.An 88-bed teaching hospital in Entre Ríos, Argentina.Patients.A total of 3,496 patients who underwent surgery were included in the first stage of the study and 3,982 were included in the final stage.Results.Comparison of the first stage of the study with the final stage revealed that antimicrobial prophylaxis was given at the appropriate time to 55% and 88% of patients, respectively (relative risk [RR], 0.27 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.25-0.30]; P < .01); the antimicrobial regimen was adequate in 74% and 87% of patients, respectively (RR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.45-0.55]; P < .01); duration of the prophylaxis was adequate in 44% and 55% of patients, respectively (RR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.77-0.84]; P < .01); and the surgical site infection rates were 3.2% and 1.9%, respectively (RR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.44-0.79]; P < .01). Antimicrobial expenditure was US$10,678.66 per 1,000 patient-days during the first stage and US$7,686.05 per 1,000 patient-days during the final stage (RR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.86-0.89]; P<.01).Conclusion.The intervention based on training and application of a protocol with an automatic stop of prophylaxis favored compliance with the hospital's current surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines before the intervention, achieving significant reductions of surgical site infection rates and substantial savings for the healthcare system.

Reduction in Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis Expenditure and the Rate of Surgical Site Infection by Means of a Protocol That Controls the Use of Prophylaxis

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 1358-1365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marisa I. Gómez ◽  
Silvia I. Acosta-Gnass ◽  
Luisa Mosqueda-Barboza ◽  
Juan A Basualdo
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Final Stage ◽  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Prospective Survey ◽  
Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

Objective.To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention based on training and the use of a protocol with an automatic stop of antimicrobial prophylaxis to improve hospital compliance with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines.Design.An interventional study with a before-after trial was conducted in 3 stages: a 3-year initial stage (January 1999 to December 2001), during which a descriptive-prospective survey was performed to evaluate surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis and surgical site infections; a 6-month second stage (January to June 2002), during which an educational intervention was performed regarding the routine use of a surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis request form that included an automatic stop of prophylaxis (the “automatic-stop prophylaxis form”); and a 3-year final stage (July 2002 to June 2005), during which a descriptive-prospective survey of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis and surgical site infections was again performed.Setting.An 88-bed teaching hospital in Entre Ríos, Argentina.Patients.A total of 3,496 patients who underwent surgery were included in the first stage of the study and 3,982 were included in the final stage.Results.Comparison of the first stage of the study with the final stage revealed that antimicrobial prophylaxis was given at the appropriate time to 55% and 88% of patients, respectively (relative risk [RR], 0.27 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.25-0.30];P&lt; .01); the antimicrobial regimen was adequate in 74% and 87% of patients, respectively (RR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.45-0.55];P&lt; .01); duration of the prophylaxis was adequate in 44% and 55% of patients, respectively (RR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.77-0.84];P&lt; .01); and the surgical site infection rates were 3.2% and 1.9%, respectively (RR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.44-0.79];P&lt; .01). Antimicrobial expenditure was US$10,678.66 per 1,000 patient-days during the first stage and US$7,686.05 per 1,000 patient-days during the final stage (RR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.86-0.89];P&lt;.01).Conclusion.The intervention based on training and application of a protocol with an automatic stop of prophylaxis favored compliance with the hospital's current surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines before the intervention, achieving significant reductions of surgical site infection rates and substantial savings for the healthcare system.

scholarly journals The Role of Bacterial Colonization of the Suture Thread in Early Identification and Targeted Antibiotic Treatment of Surgical Site Infections: A Prospective Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 4416
Author(s):  
Francesco Iovino ◽  
Federica Calò ◽  
Consiglia Orabona ◽  
Alessandra Pizza ◽  
Francesca Fisone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Early Identification ◽  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Bacterial Colonization ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Suture Thread

Background: The aim of the present study is to investigate the role of the colonization of suture thread to identify patients at risk of developing a surgical site infection (SSI) after clean surgical procedures. Methods: Patients who underwent elective clean surgery procedures at the Surgery Unit of the AOU-University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli in a 21-month period were prospectively enrolled. For each patient, a synthetic absorbable thread in Lactomer 9-1 was inserted into the surgical site at the end of surgery and microbiologically evaluated after 48 h. Antibiotic prophylaxis was chosen according to international guidelines. Results: A total of 238 patients were enrolled; 208 (87.4%) of them were subjected to clean procedures without the placement of prosthesis, and 30 (12.6%) with prosthesis. Of the 238 patients, 117 (49.2%) underwent an antimicrobial prophylaxis. Overall, 79 (33.2%) patients showed a bacterial colonization of the thread: among the 208 without the implantation of prosthesis, 19 (21.8%) of the 87 with antibiotic prophylaxis and in 58 (47.9%) of the 121 without it; among the 30 patients with the implantation of prosthesis, only two patients showed a colonized thread. The patients with antibiotic prophylaxis developed a colonization of the thread less frequently than those without it (17.9% vs. 47.9%, p < 0.001). SSI was observed in six (2.5%) patients, all of them showing a colonized thread (7.6% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). The bacteria identified in colonized threads were the same as those found in SSIs. Conclusions: Our study presents a new method that is able to precociously assess patients who have undergone clean procedures who may develop SSI, and identify the microorganism involved.

scholarly journals Adherence of Surgeons to Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Guidelines in a Tertiary General Hospital in a Rapidly Developing Country

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Abdel-Aziz ◽  
Ayman El-Menyar ◽  
Hassan Al-Thani ◽  
Ahmad Zarour ◽  
Ashok Parchani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Surgical Units ◽  
Antibiotics Use ◽  
Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Clean Contaminated ◽  
Alternative Antibiotic ◽  
Hospital Protocols

Objectives. To assess the standard practice of care of surgeons regarding surgical antibiotic prophylaxis, to identify gaps, and to set recommendations.Methods. A retrospective analysis of data obtained from different surgical units in a single center in Qatar over a 3-month period in 2012. A total of 101 patients who underwent surgery and followed regimes for surgical prophylaxis as per hospital guidelines were included in the study.Results. The overall use of antibiotic was 89%, whereas the current practice did not match the recommended hospital protocols in 53.5% of cases. Prolonged antibiotics use (59.3%) was the commonest reason for nonadherence followed by the use of an alternative antibiotic to that recommended in the protocol (31.5%) and no prophylaxis was used in 9.2% of cases. The rate of compliance was significantly higher among clean surgery than clean contaminated group (P=0.03). Forty-four percent of clean and 65% of clean-contaminated procedures showed noncompliance with the recommended surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis hospital guidelines.Conclusion. Lack of adherence to hospital protocols is not uncommon. This finding remains a challenge to encourage clinicians to follow hospital guidelines appropriately and to consistently apply the surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. The role of clinical pharmacist may facilitate this process across all surgical disciplines.

scholarly journals Role of preoperative biliary stents, bile contamination and antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical site infections after pancreaticoduodenectomy

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Gavazzi ◽  
Cristina Ridolfi ◽  
Giovanni Capretti ◽  
Maria Rachele Angiolini ◽  
Paola Morelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Biliary Stents

scholarly journals 884. Evaluation of Surgical Site Infections in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients with Beta-Lactam Allergies

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S477-S478
Author(s):  
Clayton Mowrer ◽  
Trevor C Van Schooneveld ◽  
Stephen Matthews ◽  
Erica J Stohs
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Organ Transplant ◽  
Systemic Infection ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Solid Organ Transplant ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Beta Lactam ◽  
Lactam Antibiotic ◽  
Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis

Abstract Background Beta-lactam allergies (BLA) are common, but the prevalence and impact on solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is largely unknown. We assessed the prevalence of BLA labels in SOT recipients at the time of transplant and evaluated their influence on surgical site infection (SSI) prophylaxis and SSI incidence. Methods All patients undergoing first heart, kidney, liver SOT at our institution were retrospectively reviewed (1/1/2015-12/31/2019). Antibiotic allergies, surgical antibiotic prophylaxis, and SSIs were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Reported BLA reactions were classified as potentially IgE-mediated, delayed, or non-allergic based on documentation. SSIs were reported according to NHSN definitions, and the incidence of SSI was compared between patients with and without reported BLA. SSI prophylaxis regimens were compared to institutional guidelines. Basic descriptive statistics were performed. Results Out of a total cohort of 751 patients (122 heart, 435 kidney, 209 liver, 4 multi-organ), 129 (17%) reported at least one BLA, with 104 (15%) with reactions to penicillins, 26 (3%) to cephalosporins, and 1 (0.1%) to carbapenems. Commonly reported reactions were rash (38%), hives (25%), and “other” (21%); 28% of documented reactions were not documented or classified as non-allergic. SSI developed in 7 (6.1%) of heart, 10 (2.5%) of kidney, and 16 (9.4%) of liver transplant recipients. Excluding 44 patients already on antibiotics for treatment of systemic infection, guideline concordant beta-lactam antibiotic surgical prophylaxis was administered to 6 (5.2%) of BLA group vs 490 (85.8%) in the non-BLA group (p&lt; 0.01); among the BLA group who did not receive a beta-lactam, 96 (83%) received a regimen concordant with institutional guidelines for penicillin allergy and 14 (12%) received guideline non-adherent regimens. Patients reporting BLA did not have a higher incidence of SSIs compared to those without BLA: 6 (4.8%) vs 27 (4.5%) respectively, p=0.86. Conclusion BLA prevalence in our SOT population was similar to previously reported rates, but many reported reactions were not allergic in nature. Pre-transplant allergy evaluation for patients with reported BLA may improve SSI antibiotic prophylaxis compliance. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals The “Torment” of Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis among Surgeons

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 1357
Author(s):  
Massimo Sartelli ◽  
Federico Coccolini ◽  
Angeloantonio Carrieri ◽  
Francesco M. Labricciosa ◽  
Enrico Cicuttin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Operative Measures

Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) is one of the peri-operative measures for preventing surgical site infections (SSIs). Its goal is to counteract the proliferation of bacteria in the surgical site during intervention in order to reduce the risk of SSIs. SAP should be administered for surgical interventions where the benefit expected (prevention of SSIs) is higher compared to the risk (serious side effects, such as acute kidney injury, Clostridioides difficile infection, and the spread of antimicrobial resistance). In prescribing SAP, surgeons should have both the awareness necessary “to handle antibiotics with care”, and the knowledge required to use them appropriately.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document