Septal deviation could be associated with the development of bronchial asthma: a nationwide cohort study

Background Maxillary sinus hypoplasia (MSH), associated with enophthalmos and hypoglobus in the silent sinus syndrome (SSS), is a poorly studied condition. The real incidence of MSH and SSS in the adult population is not known. Our study aims at estimating the radiological prevalence of MSH and identifying undiagnosed cases of SSS in a retrospective cohort. Methods A cross-sectional retrospective cohort study was performed in adults, without a history of maxillofacial surgery or trauma, undergoing head CT scans. A radiological database of 1012 consecutive scans was reviewed independently by two authors to identify patients with signs of MSH and SSS and associated findings (septal deviation, uncinate deviation, concha bullosa, sinus opacification, bony rarefaction, and pterygopalatine fossa enlargement). The findings of MSH and SSS were compared with radiological reports. Results 891 eligible CT scans were analyzed. MSH and SSS prevalences were 6.17% (n = 55) and 0,56% (n = 5), respectively. The maxillary sinus was normally or partially ventilated in 96.36% of MSH patients. Lateralization of the uncinate process was detected in about 50% of MSH patients, while a septal deviation towards the affected sinus was detected in 21.82%. In 20% of MSH scans, a concha bullosa was identified. Radiological reports identified a single MSH case. Conclusions Our study confirmed the literature data on MSH prevalence, while it determined a precedently unknown prevalence for SSS, underestimated in the radiology reports. This prevalence needs further confirmation but suggests a routine accurate comparison of both maxillary sinuses in CT scans.

Download Full-text

Physiologic and pathologic septal deviations: subjective and objective functional rhinologic findings

Rhinology Journal ◽

10.4193/rhino10.089 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 49 (1) ◽

pp. 24-29

Author(s):

G. Gogniashvilli ◽

E. Steinmeier ◽

G. Mlynski ◽

A.G. Beule

Keyword(s):

Cohort Study ◽

Flow Velocity ◽

Healthy Subjects ◽

Subjective Assessment ◽

Septal Deviation ◽

Nasal Resistance ◽

Nasal Breathing ◽

Cohort Study Design ◽

Unselected Group ◽

Definition Of

OBJECTIVE: A high incidence of septal deviation with significant inter-rater variability has been reported. An explanation could be the presence of physiological septal deviation besides pathological ones. We differentiated an unselected cohort by their nasal resistance into groups with physiological normal and pathologically increased resistance to detect differences and analogies in comparison to healthy subjects and a pathological cohort. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: A total of 356 patients were assessed using rhinoresistometry, acoustic rhinometry, endoscopy and visual analogue scales. After definition of a benchmark between physiological and pathological nasal resistance, group differences were calculated and correlations analysed. RESULTS: The normal one-sided inspiratory nasal resistance was defined as less or equal to 0.35 sPa/cm^3 at a flow-velocity of 250 cm^3/s (R250). Using this benchmark, the unselected group of non-rhinological patients was differentiated into 114 subjects with physiological nasal resistance and 44 with pathological septal deviation. Nasal resistance after decongestion was significantly lower for normal or patients with a physiological septal deviation in comparison to the rhinological one on both nasal sides. Healthy subjects and patients with physiological septal deviation showed similarities in objective rhinological parameters as well as rhinological patients and patients with pathological septal deviation derived from the unselected group of non-rhinological patients. Furthermore, this benchmark of nasal resistance shows significant correlations with subjective assessment of nasal breathing. CONCLUSION: Inspiratory nasal resistance obtained at a flow-velocity of 250 cm^3/s using rhinoresistometry may be useful to distinguish patients with physiological and pathological septal deviation. Correlation with subjective assessment and endoscopic findings is improved.

Download Full-text