Nationwide Longitudinal Study of Independent Risk Factors for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome after Trauma

2018 ◽  
Vol 227 (4) ◽  
pp. e15
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Tignanelli ◽  
Mark R. Hemmila ◽  
Mary A. Rogers ◽  
Krishnan Raghavendran
2021 ◽  
pp. 2100857
Author(s):  
Alexandre Tran ◽  
Shannon M. Fernando ◽  
Laurent J. Brochard ◽  
Eddy Fan ◽  
Kenji Inaba ◽  
...  

PurposeTo summarise the prognostic associations between various clinical risk factors and the development of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) following traumatic injury.MethodsWe conducted this review in accordance with the PRISMA and CHARMS guidelines. We searched six databases from inception through December 2020. We included English language studies describing the clinical risk factors associated with the development of post-traumatic ARDS, as defined by either the American-European Consensus Conference or the Berlin definition. We pooled adjusted odds ratios for prognostic factors using the random effects method. We assessed risk of bias using the QUIPS tool and certainty of findings using GRADE methodology.ResultsWe included 39 studies involving 5 350 927 patients. We identified the amount of crystalloid resuscitation as a potentially modifiable prognostic factor associated with the development of post-traumatic ARDS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.19 for each additional liter of crystalloid administered within first 6 h after injury, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.24, high certainty). Non-modifiable prognostic factors with a moderate or high certainty of association with post-traumatic ARDS included increasing age, non-Hispanic white race, blunt mechanism of injury, presence of head injury, pulmonary contusion, or rib fracture; and increasing chest injury severity.ConclusionWe identified one important modifiable factor, the amount of crystalloid resuscitation within the first 24 h of injury, and several non-modifiable factors associated with development of post-traumatic ARDS. This information should support the judicious use of crystalloid resuscitation in trauma patients and may inform the development of a risk-stratification tools.


2017 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 390
Author(s):  
Eduardo Mantovani Cardoso ◽  
Aniele Tomadon ◽  
Keli Lovison ◽  
Péricles Almeida Delfino Duarte

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aude Gibelin ◽  
Antoine Parrot ◽  
Bernard Maitre ◽  
Christian Brun-Buisson ◽  
Armand Mekontso Dessap ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (7) ◽  
pp. 1405-1410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amory de Roulet ◽  
Rita V. Burke ◽  
Joanna Lim ◽  
Stephanie Papillon ◽  
David W. Bliss ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (144) ◽  
pp. 160116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Confalonieri ◽  
Francesco Salton ◽  
Francesco Fabiano

Since its first description, the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been acknowledged to be a major clinical problem in respiratory medicine. From July 2015 to July 2016 almost 300 indexed articles were published on ARDS. This review summarises only eight of them as an arbitrary overview of clinical relevance: definition and epidemiology, risk factors, prevention and treatment. A strict application of definition criteria is crucial, but the diverse resource-setting scenarios foster geographic variability and contrasting outcome data. A large international multicentre prospective cohort study including 50 countries across five continents reported that ARDS is underdiagnosed, and there is potential for improvement in its management. Furthermore, epidemiological data from low-income countries suggest that a revision of the current definition of ARDS is needed in order to improve its recognition and global clinical outcome. In addition to the well-known risk-factors for ARDS, exposure to high ozone levels and low vitamin D plasma concentrations were found to be predisposing circumstances. Drug-based preventive strategies remain a major challenge, since two recent trials on aspirin and statins failed to reduce the incidence in at-risk patients. A new disease-modifying therapy is awaited: some recent studies promised to improve the prognosis of ARDS, but mortality and disabling complications are still high in survivors in intensive care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document