Validation and application of bearing and block tearing resistance; background to prEN1993-1-8:2021

2021 ◽  
Vol 187 ◽  
pp. 106985
Author(s):  
Primož Može ◽  
Fei Yang ◽  
Milan Veljkovic
Keyword(s):  
2004 ◽  
Vol 52 (10) ◽  
pp. 3123-3133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ho Sung Kim ◽  
József Karger-Kocsis
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 602-604 ◽  
pp. 2267-2272
Author(s):  
Shu Lei Zhao ◽  
Zheng Yuan Wei ◽  
Xiao Tian Ding ◽  
Qiang Lin

This paper experimentally examined the impact of four different drying methods (free drying, press drying, vacuum drying and impingement drying) on paper physical properties including roughness, elongation, air permeance, tearing resistance, tensile index and bursting strength. The handsheets materials are HWBKP (Hardwood Bleached Chemical Pulp), SWBKP (Softwood Bleached Chemical Pulp), CTMP (Chemical Thermo mechanical Pulp) and ATMP (Advanced Thermo Mechanical Pulp). Good experimental data were obtained for the four pulps under different drying conditions. The results of our investigation indicate that press drying have lower surface roughness, elongation and air permeance but higher tearing resistance; the vacuum drying have higher roughness, tensile index and bursting strength; the impingement drying have lower tearing resistance, tensile index and bursting strength but higher elongation and air permeance. Selection of different drying conditions for effective productivity and quality improvement potential is proposed as a direction for the future dryer design.


2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
Nicholas Ohms ◽  
Diego Belato Rosado ◽  
Wim De Waele

Pipelines in harsh environments may be subjected to large deformations. Classic stress-based design needs to be complemented with strain-based design. An important parameter in the design is the crack growth resistance. SENT testing (Single Edge Notch Tension) allows to determine the so-called material’s tearing resistance curve. Very recently the first standard on SENT testing, BS 8571:2014, has been published. SENT testing is however still subject to extensive research and different approaches with respect to eg. notch placement, crack extension measurement and analysis exist. In this paper two methods for calculating crack extension based on the unloading compliance procedure are used and compared, proving that they show little difference. This is performed on an API-5L X70 steel grade and this for different configurations, namely an inner diameter notch and a through thickness notch. The results showed little difference between the different configurations, although the inner diameter showed higher crack growth resistance. Furthermore, the results are compared to visual observations of the fracture surfaces and a hardness map. The fracture surfaces corresponded to the obtained resistance curves. However, no real correlation between the hardness map and the other results could be seen.


Author(s):  
Ricardo Tournier ◽  
Fernando Lado

An appropriate tear strength is one of the main properties that concern customers and it is also a significant source of claims. The authors make a review of the production process, focusing on each step that can either damage the natural strength of collagen fibers or improve them, and therefore, the leather. The aim of this work, divided in Part 1 and 2, is to transfer field tannery experiences collected over 40 years of activity in different tanneries, to colleagues that are looking for world class leather production. Part 1 has been published in JALCA, 116 (12), 2021.


1997 ◽  
Vol 41 (01) ◽  
pp. 69-80
Author(s):  
Mark D. Bracco ◽  
Tomasz Wierzbicki

This paper studies the cutting by a wedge of advanced double hull (ADH) small-scale models. A total of six cutting experiments were performed with six different wedge geometries. Complex deformation patterns observed in the damaged specimens were simplified to obtain a closed-form upper bound for the steady-state cutting force. The ADH steady-state cutting force solution varied from 6% above to 12% below the experimental mean steady-state force. The absolute average error is 5%.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document