Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (7) ◽  
pp. 765-776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wellington Luiz de Oliveira da Rosa ◽  
Evandro Piva ◽  
Adriana Fernandes da Silva
Polymers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 814
Author(s):  
Louis Hardan ◽  
Rim Bourgi ◽  
Naji Kharouf ◽  
Davide Mancino ◽  
Maciej Zarow ◽  
...  

Currently, the availability of a wide variety of universal adhesives makes it difficult for clinicians to choose the correct system for specific bonding situations to dentin substrate. This study aimed to determine whether there are any alternative techniques or additional strategies available to enhance the bond strength of universal adhesives to dentin through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Two reviewers executed a literature search up to September 2020 in four electronic databases: PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Scopus, and EMBASE. Only in vitro studies that reported the dentin bond strength of universal adhesives using additional strategies were included. An analysis was carried out using Review Manager Software version 5.3.5 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark). The methodological quality of each in vitro study was assessed according to the parameters of a previous systematic. A total of 5671 potentially relevant studies were identified. After title and abstract examination, 74 studies remained in systematic review. From these, a total of 61 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The bond strength of universal adhesives to dentin was improved by the use of one of the following techniques: Previous application of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) inhibitors (p < 0.001), prolonged application time (p = 0.007), scrubbing technique (p < 0.001), selective dentin etching (p < 0.001), non-atmospheric plasma (p = 0.01), ethanol-wet bonding (p < 0.01), prolonged blowing time (p = 0.02), multiple layer application (p = 0.005), prolonged curing time (p = 0.006), and hydrophobic layer coating (p < 0.001). On the other hand, the use of a shortened application time (p = 0.006), and dentin desensitizers (p = 0.01) impaired the bond strength of universal adhesives to dentin. Most of the analyses performed showed a high heterogenicity. The in vitro evidence suggests that the application of universal adhesives using some alternative techniques or additional strategies may be beneficial for improving their bonding performance to dentin. This research received no external funding. Considering that this systematic review was carried out only with in vitro studies, registration was not performed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. e35
Author(s):  
F.S. Camim ◽  
M. Vertuan ◽  
D.C. Santin ◽  
R.F.L. Mondelli ◽  
L. Wang ◽  
...  

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (21) ◽  
pp. 6694
Author(s):  
Flavia Iaculli ◽  
Alessandro Salucci ◽  
Gianni Di Giorgio ◽  
Valeria Luzzi ◽  
Gaetano Ierardo ◽  
...  

Background: Conventional composites are largely used in pediatric restorative dentistry and demonstrate successful clinical outcomes. However, the need for simplification of operative steps in young or uncooperative children demands reliable alternatives. Therefore, the aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the in vitro bond strength of glass ionomer cements (GICs) and self-adhesive flowable composites (SFCs) on deciduous teeth. Methods: A comprehensive literature search according to the PRISMA checklist was manually and electronically performed by two independent reviewers through the following databases: MEDLINE/PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Embase, to include in vitro studies comparing GICs and SFCs bond strength values of restorations on primary teeth. In addition, three groups of meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models. Results: Three articles meeting the inclusion criteria were selected and subjected to both qualitative and quantitative assessment. No statistically significant difference was found between SFC versus GIC; however, both groups significantly differed with conventional flowable composites (CFs). Conclusions: Despite the absence of significant difference in bond strength values, SFCs may be considered a valid alternative to GICs in the restoration of deciduous teeth, although CFs proved better in vitro performances.


2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 624-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Cantieri de Mello ◽  
Sandro Basso Bitencourt ◽  
Daniela Micheline dos Santos ◽  
Aldiéris Alves Pesqueira ◽  
Eduardo Piza Pellizzer ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 125
Author(s):  
SandroBasso Bitencourt ◽  
LetíciaChaves Ferreira ◽  
LeticiaCerri Mazza ◽  
DanielaMicheline dos Santos ◽  
AldierisAlves Pesqueira ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Inês Francisco ◽  
Raquel Travassos ◽  
Catarina Nunes ◽  
Madalena Ribeiro ◽  
Filipa Marques ◽  
...  

Background: There has been an increase in demand for orthodontic treatment within the adult population, who likely receive restorative treatments using ceramic structures. The current state of the art regarding the most effective method to achieve an appropriate bond strength of brackets on ceramic surfaces isn’t consensual. This systematic review aims to compare the available surface treatments to ceramics and determine the one that allows to obtain the best bond strength. Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and the PICO methodology was used, with the question “What is the most effective technique for bonding brackets on ceramic crowns or veneers?”. The research was carried out in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. In vitro and ex vivo studies were included. The methodological quality was evaluated using the guidelines for reporting of preclinical studies on dental materials by Faggion Jr. Results: A total of 655 articles searched in various databases were initially scrutinized. Sevety one articles were chosen for quality analysis. The risk of bias was considered medium to high in most studies. The use of hydrofluoric acid (HF), silane and laser afforded the overall best results. HF and HF plus laser achieved significantly highest bond strength scores in felsdphatic porcelain, while laser was the best treatment in lithium disilicate ceramics. Conclusions: The most effective technique for bonding brackets on ceramic is dependent on the type of ceramic.


Author(s):  
Amin Davoudi ◽  
Elham Shadmehr ◽  
Melika Savoj ◽  
Mehrdad Akhavan-Khaleghi ◽  
Mahtab Tabesh ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document