scholarly journals Effect of laser irradiation on bond strength between zirconia and resin cement or veneer ceramic: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 125
Author(s):  
SandroBasso Bitencourt ◽  
LetíciaChaves Ferreira ◽  
LeticiaCerri Mazza ◽  
DanielaMicheline dos Santos ◽  
AldierisAlves Pesqueira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Laser Irradiation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Resin Cement

Effect of laser irradiation on push-out bond strength of dental fiber posts to composite resin core buildups: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 184-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amin Davoudi ◽  
Ramin Mosharraf ◽  
Ali Akhavan ◽  
Fardin Zarei ◽  
Sobhan Pourarz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Laser Irradiation ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Resin Core ◽  
Push Out

The Role of Resin Cement on Bond Strength of Glass-fiber Posts Luted Into Root Canals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of In Vitro Studies

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. E31-E44 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Sarkis-Onofre ◽  
JA Skupien ◽  
MS Cenci ◽  
RR Moraes ◽  
T Pereira-Cenci
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Glass Fiber Posts

SUMMARY Because there are several ways to cement glass-fiber posts (GFPs) into root canals, there is no consensus on the best strategy to achieve high bond strengths. A systematic review was conducted to determine if there is difference in bond strength to dentin between regular and self-adhesive resin cements and to verify the influence of several variables on the retention of GFPs. This report followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. In vitro studies that investigated the bond strength of GFPs luted with self-adhesive and regular resin cements were selected. Searches were carried out in the PubMed and Scopus databases. No publication year or language limit was used, and the last search was done in October 2012. A global comparison was performed between self-adhesive and regular resin cements. Two subgroup analyses were performed: 1) Self-adhesive × Regular resin cement + Etch-and-rinse adhesive and 2) Self-adhesive × Regular resin cement + Self-etch adhesive. The analyses were carried out using fixed-effect and random-effects models. The results showed heterogeneity in all comparisons, and higher bond strength to dentin was identified for self-adhesive cements. Although the articles included in this meta-analysis showed high heterogeneity and high risk of bias, the in vitro literature seems to suggest that use of self-adhesive resin cement could improve the retention of GFPs into root canals.

Influence of Eugenol-based Sealers on Push-out Bond Strength of Fiber Post Luted with Resin Cement: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (9) ◽  
pp. 1418-1423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aline Segatto Pires Altmann ◽  
Vicente Castelo Branco Leitune ◽  
Fabrício Mezzomo Collares
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Fiber Post ◽  
Push Out

Anti-proteolytic agents on shear bond strength: Systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. e35
Author(s):  
F.S. Camim ◽  
M. Vertuan ◽  
D.C. Santin ◽  
R.F.L. Mondelli ◽  
L. Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Meta Analysis

scholarly journals Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites and Glass Ionomer Cements to Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (21) ◽  
pp. 6694
Author(s):  
Flavia Iaculli ◽  
Alessandro Salucci ◽  
Gianni Di Giorgio ◽  
Valeria Luzzi ◽  
Gaetano Ierardo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Primary Teeth ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Deciduous Teeth ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cements ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Flowable Composites

Background: Conventional composites are largely used in pediatric restorative dentistry and demonstrate successful clinical outcomes. However, the need for simplification of operative steps in young or uncooperative children demands reliable alternatives. Therefore, the aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the in vitro bond strength of glass ionomer cements (GICs) and self-adhesive flowable composites (SFCs) on deciduous teeth. Methods: A comprehensive literature search according to the PRISMA checklist was manually and electronically performed by two independent reviewers through the following databases: MEDLINE/PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Embase, to include in vitro studies comparing GICs and SFCs bond strength values of restorations on primary teeth. In addition, three groups of meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models. Results: Three articles meeting the inclusion criteria were selected and subjected to both qualitative and quantitative assessment. No statistically significant difference was found between SFC versus GIC; however, both groups significantly differed with conventional flowable composites (CFs). Conclusions: Despite the absence of significant difference in bond strength values, SFCs may be considered a valid alternative to GICs in the restoration of deciduous teeth, although CFs proved better in vitro performances.

Is Conventional Resin Cement Adhesive Performance to Dentin Better Than Self-adhesive? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Laboratory Studies

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 484-495
Author(s):  
LL Miotti ◽  
AC Follak ◽  
AF Montagner ◽  
RT Pozzobon ◽  
BL da Silveira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Global Analysis ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Laboratory Studies ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Adhesive Performance

Clinical Relevance Conventional multistep resin cements presented higher adhesive performance to dentin than simplified self-adhesive cements, which is an important criterion for indirect restoration prognosis. SUMMARY This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the literature on laboratory studies assessing bonding performance to dentin of conventional and self-adhesive resin cements, in cementing indirect restorations. This review was reported according to the PRISMA Statement. Of a total of 518 studies, 36 were screened full text and reviewed according to exclusion criteria. Nineteen papers were included in the systematic review and meta-analyses, according to the following inclusion criteria: studies that evaluated the bond strength to dentin of indirect restorations cemented with dual conventional or self-adhesive resin cements and those that presented bond strength data in MPa as an outcome. Statistical analyses were conducted using Rev-Man 5.1. Comparisons were performed with random effects models at 5% significance level. A global analysis comparing conventional and self-adhesive cements and three subgroup analyses comparing immediate and long-term results were performed. Global analysis showed a difference between groups, with conventional resin cements presenting higher bond strength results than self-adhesive resin cements, in immediate and long-term time periods (both p=0.03). Immediate and longterm bond strength results were different for self-adhesive cements, favoring immediate bond strength (p=0.03), but immediate and long-term bond strength results for conventional resin cements were not different (p=0.06). Medium or high risk of bias was found in all studies. Conventional multistep resin cements showed superior overall adhesive performance compared with simplified self-adhesive resin cements when used to cement indirect restorations to dentin.

The Effect of Surface Treatment on Shear Bond Strength between Y-TZP and Veneer Ceramic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 624-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Cantieri de Mello ◽  
Sandro Basso Bitencourt ◽  
Daniela Micheline dos Santos ◽  
Aldiéris Alves Pesqueira ◽  
Eduardo Piza Pellizzer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Effect Of Surface

scholarly journals Effects of the combination of Er:YAG laser and sandblasting on the shear bond strength between zirconia and resin cement

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. e191449
Author(s):  
Urias Silva Vasconcelos ◽  
Thalisson Saymo de Oliveira Silva ◽  
Daylana Pacheco da Silva ◽  
Graciela Maria Oliveira Sipaúba ◽  
Valdimar da Silva Valente ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shear Strength ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Aluminum Oxide ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Laser Irradiation ◽  
Er:Yag Laser ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Zirconia Ceramic ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Luting Cement

Aim: This study was conducted to determine the bond strength between zirconia ceramic and resin luting cement according to the type of surface treatment applied. Methods: Sixty zirconia cylinders measuring 4 x 4 mm were manufactured and distributed into five experimental groups and a control group (n = 10): G1 - sandblasting with 110 μm aluminum oxide; G2 - sandblasting with 30 μm Rocatec Soft®; G3 - Er:YAG laser irradiation at 400 mJ; G4 - Er:YAG laser combined with sandblasting with aluminum oxide; G5 - Er:YAG laser combined with sandblasting with Rocatec Soft®; G6 - no treatment (Control). The zirconia cylinders were bonded in the center of composite resin cylinders (6 mm diameter) using RelyX Ultimate® cement. Shear strength was measured after thermocycling (6000 cycles and 5-55° C). Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc with a 5% significance level. Results: Group 4 had a significantly higher shear strength than all the other groups, except Group 1. Group 3 had a significantly lower shear strength compared with Groups 1 and 4. Conclusion: Sandblasting with 110μm aluminum oxide particles after laser irradiation may be an effective zirconia surface treatment. The use of Er: YAG laser alone is not effective at increasing the bond between resin cement and zirconia.

scholarly journals What Is the Most Effective Technique for Bonding Brackets on Ceramic—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2022 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Inês Francisco ◽  
Raquel Travassos ◽  
Catarina Nunes ◽  
Madalena Ribeiro ◽  
Filipa Marques ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
Dental Materials ◽  
Quality Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Effective Technique

Background: There has been an increase in demand for orthodontic treatment within the adult population, who likely receive restorative treatments using ceramic structures. The current state of the art regarding the most effective method to achieve an appropriate bond strength of brackets on ceramic surfaces isn’t consensual. This systematic review aims to compare the available surface treatments to ceramics and determine the one that allows to obtain the best bond strength. Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and the PICO methodology was used, with the question “What is the most effective technique for bonding brackets on ceramic crowns or veneers?”. The research was carried out in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. In vitro and ex vivo studies were included. The methodological quality was evaluated using the guidelines for reporting of preclinical studies on dental materials by Faggion Jr. Results: A total of 655 articles searched in various databases were initially scrutinized. Sevety one articles were chosen for quality analysis. The risk of bias was considered medium to high in most studies. The use of hydrofluoric acid (HF), silane and laser afforded the overall best results. HF and HF plus laser achieved significantly highest bond strength scores in felsdphatic porcelain, while laser was the best treatment in lithium disilicate ceramics. Conclusions: The most effective technique for bonding brackets on ceramic is dependent on the type of ceramic.

Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (7) ◽  
pp. 765-776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wellington Luiz de Oliveira da Rosa ◽  
Evandro Piva ◽  
Adriana Fernandes da Silva
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Universal Adhesives
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document