Effect of modified flux on MIG arc brazing-fusion welding of aluminum alloy to steel butt joint

2017 ◽  
Vol 245 ◽  
pp. 115-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guoliang Qin ◽  
Yang Ji ◽  
Hong Ma ◽  
Zhiyong Ao
2010 ◽  
Vol 146-147 ◽  
pp. 1402-1405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Che Lah Nur Azida ◽  
Azman Jalar ◽  
Norinsan Kamil Othman ◽  
Nasrizal Mohd Rashdi ◽  
Md Zaukah Ibel

AA6061 Aluminum alloy welded joint using two different filler metals were studied by using X-ray CT-Scan. The filler metals ER 4043 and ER 5356 were used in this present work in order to investigate the effect of using different filler metals on the welded joint quality of AA 6061 aluminum alloy in welded zone microstructure. Gas metal arc welding (GMAW) technique and V grove butt joint with four layers and five passes welded joint were performed. From this investigation, it is found that AA6061 with ER 4043 showed less distribution of porosity compared to AA6061 with ER 5356 welded joint confirmed by X-ray Ct-Scan. The decreasing of porosities and presence of very fine grains in weld region area with ER 5356 compared to ER 4043 will be discussed in term of microstructure analysis.


2022 ◽  
Vol 149 ◽  
pp. 107796
Author(s):  
Na Qi ◽  
Leilei Wang ◽  
Yanqiu Zhao ◽  
Shuhao Tian ◽  
Xiaohong Zhan

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (17) ◽  
pp. 3486 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Joey Griffiths ◽  
Dylan T. Petersen ◽  
David Garcia ◽  
Hang Z. Yu

The repair of high strength, high performance 7075 aluminum alloy is essential for a broad range of aerospace and defense applications. However, it is challenging to implement it using traditional fusion welding-based approaches, owing to hot cracking and void formation during solidification. Here, the use of an emerging solid-state additive manufacturing technology, additive friction stir deposition, is explored for the repair of volume damages such as through -holes and grooves in 7075 aluminum alloy. Three repair experiments have been conducted: double through-hole filling, single through-hole filling, and long, wide-groove filling. In all experiments, additive friction stir deposition proves to be effective at filling the entire volume. Additionally, sufficient mixing between the deposited material and the side wall of the feature is always observed in the upper portions of the repair. Poor mixing and inadequate repair quality have been observed in deeper portions of the filling in some scenarios. Based on these observations, the advantages and disadvantages of using additive friction stir deposition for repairing volume damages are discussed. High quality and highly flexible repairs are expected with systematic optimization work on process control and repair strategy development in the future.


2010 ◽  
Vol 638-642 ◽  
pp. 1494-1499
Author(s):  
Serge Tcherniaeff ◽  
Franck Girot ◽  
Ivan Iordanoff

The understanding of the weld formation process in FSW is difficult due to: (1) the complexities resulting from coupled physical phenomenon’s (thermo mechanical and metallic process); (2) the difficulties characterizing exactly the interactions between the tool and the materials (friction, 3D material flow, …); (3) the collecting of complete and relevant information during the generation of the weld. Technological studies prove that FSW process is easy to realise. In addition to that, the welds may have good mechanical behaviours, in comparison with those resulting from traditional fusion welding as GMAW. The challenge is to relate the main and relevant parameters of the process (geometry of the tool, topologies of the assembly, others parameters such as axial force, torque, tool positioning, the nature of materials to be assembled,..) to the mechanical properties expected for that weld The study proposes an analogical simulation in a modeling clay (plasticine) workpieces environment. The goal is to obtain a better understanding of the joining creation in the case of butt join of homogeneous assembly of two flat plates made of aluminium alloy AA2017T351. By varying different parameters such as geometrical conditions of assembly, geometry of the tool, other kinematics parameters, we can measure the consequences on the dimensional morphology of the weld. The latter is then characterized by geometrical parameters such as penetration, area of the join, geometrical offset between tool axis and weld interface, and chromatic parameters… . A comparison between the assembly of two aluminium alloys sheets and the equivalent in plasticine workpieces will be discussed, so as to outline differences and analogies between them.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document