scholarly journals Characteristics of community-acquired respiratory viruses infections except seasonal influenza in transplant recipients and non-transplant critically ill patients

Author(s):  
Kyoung Hwa Lee ◽  
Seul Gi Yoo ◽  
Yonggeun Cho ◽  
Da Eun Kwon ◽  
Yeonju La ◽  
...  
Critical Care ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. P341 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Van Someren Gréve ◽  
KF Van der Sluijs ◽  
NP Juffermans ◽  
T Winters ◽  
SP Rebers ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 388-398
Author(s):  
Burçin Halaçlı ◽  
Pervin Hancı ◽  
Ebru Ortaç Ersoy ◽  
Serpil Öcal ◽  
Mine Durusu Tanrıöver ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett A Melnikoff ◽  
René P Myers

Fungal infections remain an important cause of morbidity and mortality in surgical settings, with critically ill patients, transplant recipients, and sick neonates all especially vulnerable. Over the past few decades, technological and scientific advancements have improved physicians’ ability to sustain life in critically ill patients; developments in chemotherapeutics and immune-based therapies have yielded increased survival for many cancer patients; organ transplantation has evolved dramatically; and the use of invasive therapies (eg, ventricular assist devices) has increased markedly. With these changes has come an increase in the incidence of serious fungal infections, including the less common but potentially fatal noncandidal infections caused by Aspergillus and the Zygomycetes Mucor and Rhizopus. This review outlines an approach to the workup and management of the nonneutropenic surgical patient with a suspected noncandidal infection (aspergillosis and zygomycosis). Figures show biopsy samples from an elderly man with chronic progressive disseminated histoplasmosis and thick-walled, broad-based budding yeasts typical for Blastomyces dermatitidis on biopsy material. This review contains 2 figures and 47 references Key words: aspergillosis, aspergillosis prophylaxis, blastomycosis, Cryptococcus, histoplasmosis, noncandidal fungal infections  


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett A Melnikoff ◽  
René P Myers

Fungal infections remain an important cause of morbidity and mortality in surgical settings, with critically ill patients, transplant recipients, and sick neonates all especially vulnerable. Fungal infections remain an important cause of morbidity and mortality in surgical settings, with critically ill patients, transplant recipients, and sick neonates all especially vulnerable. Despite the development of a number of new and useful antifungal agents in the past decade and the noteworthy improvements in therapeutic approaches to fungal infections, physicians’ ability to diagnose these infections in a timely fashion remains limited, and patient outcomes remain poor. Antifungal prophylaxis has emerged as a potential means of reducing the occurrence of serious fungal infections. In patient populations estimated to be at high risk for acquiring a fungal infection, antifungal prophylaxis has reduced infection rates by about 50%; however, it has not been shown to significantly improve mortality. This review discusses both established and newly approved systemic antifungal agents. Tables list characteristics of currently available antifungals and antifungal chemotherapy. This review contains 2 tables and 32 references Key words: antifungal chemotherapy, antifungal prophylaxis, antifungals, Candida prophylaxis, systemic antifungal medications


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett A Melnikoff ◽  
René P Myers

Fungal infections remain an important cause of morbidity and mortality in surgical settings, with critically ill patients, transplant recipients, and sick neonates all especially vulnerable. Over the past few decades, technological and scientific advancements have improved physicians’ ability to sustain life in critically ill patients; developments in chemotherapeutics and immune-based therapies have yielded increased survival for many cancer patients; organ transplantation has evolved dramatically; and the use of invasive therapies (eg, ventricular assist devices) has increased markedly. With these changes has come an increase in the incidence of serious Candida infections. This review covers the definition and classification, epidemiology and risk factors, and clinical evaluation of candidiasis, as well as management of candidemia, acute disseminated candidiasis, nonhematogenous candidiasis, and peritonitis and intra-abdominal abscess. Figures show Candida endophthalmitis in patients with persistent fungemia and superficial candidiasis in the gastrointestinal tract. Tables list clinical presentation and diagnostic methods for common fungal infections, antimicrobial agents of choice for candidal infections, and the latest guidelines for candidiasis. This review contains 2 figures, 3 tables and 131 references Key words: acute disseminated candidiasis, candidemia, candidiasis, candiduria, nonhematogenous candidiasis  


2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (08) ◽  
pp. 571-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manisha Jain ◽  
Shalini Duggal ◽  
Tulsi Das Chugh

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an important and common cause of mortality and morbidity in immunocompromised patients such as those with HIV/AIDS, transplant recipients on immunosuppressive therapy, and malignant hematological disease. After primary infection with CMV the virus becomes latent in multiple organs and can later be reactivated during severe dysregulation of the immune system. A large population carry dormant virus and are thus at risk for reactivation. However, reactivation of CMV has been reported in "non-immunosuppressed patients" such as severe trauma, sepsis, shock, burns, cirrhosis and other critically ill patients lying in the intensive care units. Therefore, the intensivists are increasingly facing a dilemma of identifying such patients to treat and there is a debate if there is a scientific justification for prophylaxis in such immunocompetent patients.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett A Melnikoff ◽  
René P Myers

Fungal infections remain an important cause of morbidity and mortality in surgical settings, with critically ill patients, transplant recipients, and sick neonates all especially vulnerable. Fungal infections remain an important cause of morbidity and mortality in surgical settings, with critically ill patients, transplant recipients, and sick neonates all especially vulnerable. Despite the development of a number of new and useful antifungal agents in the past decade and the noteworthy improvements in therapeutic approaches to fungal infections, physicians’ ability to diagnose these infections in a timely fashion remains limited, and patient outcomes remain poor. Antifungal prophylaxis has emerged as a potential means of reducing the occurrence of serious fungal infections. In patient populations estimated to be at high risk for acquiring a fungal infection, antifungal prophylaxis has reduced infection rates by about 50%; however, it has not been shown to significantly improve mortality. This review discusses both established and newly approved systemic antifungal agents. Tables list characteristics of currently available antifungals and antifungal chemotherapy. This review contains 2 tables and 32 references Key words: antifungal chemotherapy, antifungal prophylaxis, antifungals, Candida prophylaxis, systemic antifungal medications


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S149-S150
Author(s):  
Alex Zimmet ◽  
Douglas Lake ◽  
Amanda M Zimmet ◽  
Shrirang M Gadrey ◽  
Taison Bell ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Transplant recipients are at increased risk of bloodstream infection (BSI), which often leads to critical illness. Due to immunosuppression, BSI in these patients may manifest with different pathophysiology compared to non-transplant recipients. We aimed to identify different trends in the pathophysiology of critically ill patients with BSI based on transplant status. Methods We reviewed data from patients admitted to the medical and surgical/trauma intensive care units (ICUs) at the University of Virginia Medical Center from 2011 to 2015. We included both solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. We performed univariate logistic regression modeling to evaluate trends in different physiological features in both transplant and non-transplant recipients in the 96 hours surrounding a positive blood culture. We then performed multivariate logistic regression modeling to identify features independently associated with a positive blood culture in the next 24 hours in transplant recipients. Results We analyzed 9,954 ICU patient-admissions (including 505 transplant recipients), with a total of 144 patient-years of physiological data, 1.3 million hourly measurements, and 15,577 blood culture instances. Of the 1,068 blood culture instances in transplant recipients, 125 (12%) were positive, compared to 1,051 of 14,509 (7%) blood culture instances in non-transplant recipients. Critically ill transplant recipients with BSI had greater abnormalities in vital signs, oxygen requirement, markers of organ damage, APACHE score, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) compared to non-transplant recipients (Figure 1). Trends in many of these features also differed based on transplant status. The multivariable logistic regression model of BSI in transplant recipients included, in decreasing strength of association: total bilirubin, systolic blood pressure, fraction of inspired oxygen, number of intravenous lines, and CCI. This model had an AUC of 0.75. Figure 1. Trends in pathophysiological abnormalities in 9,954 critically ill patients with BSI based on transplant status, 2011–2015. Each graph demonstrates the average value of the physiological variable over time relative to the acquisition of a positive blood culture. Blue curves depict trends in transplant recipients, while red curves depict trends in non-transplant recipients. We assessed 108 physiological features and show the 24 features with the greatest change around the time of blood culture. Conclusion Critically ill transplant recipients have a higher prevalence of BSI and different pathophysiological manifestations of BSI compared to non-transplant recipients. This may have implications regarding early detection and treatment of BSI in these patients. Disclosures Randall Moorman, MD, Advanced Medical Predictive Devices, Diagnostics, and Displays (Board Member, Shareholder)


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 205435812110521
Author(s):  
A. Cau ◽  
M. P. Cheng ◽  
Terry Lee ◽  
A. Levin ◽  
T. C. Lee ◽  
...  

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a potentially fatal complication of Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19). Binding of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus responsible for COVID-19, to its viral receptor, angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), results in viral entry and may cause AKI. Objectives: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the frequencies of AKI and renal replacement therapy (RRT) in critically ill COVID-19 patients and compared those frequencies with patients who were infected by respiratory viruses that bind or downregulate ACE2 (ACE2-associated viruses) and viruses that do not bind nor downregulate ACE2 (non-ACE2-associated viruses). Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Setting: Observational studies on COVID-19 and other respiratory viral infections reporting AKI and RRT were included. The exclusion criteria were non-English articles, non-peer-reviewed articles, review articles, studies that included patients under the age of 18, studies including fewer than 10 patients, and studies not reporting AKI and RRT rates. Patients: Adult COVID-19, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), and influenza patients. Measurements: We extracted the following data from the included studies: author, year, study location, age, sex, race, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, shock, vasopressor use, mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, ICU mortality, AKI, and RRT. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed and EMBASE for articles reporting AKI or RRT. AKI was defined by authors of included studies. Critical illness was defined by ICU admission. We performed a random effects meta-analysis to calculate pooled estimates for the AKI and RRT rate within each virus group using a random intercept logistic regression model. Results: Of 23 655 hospitalized, critically ill COVID-19 patients, AKI frequencies were not significantly different between COVID-19 patients (51%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 44%-57%) and critically ill patients infected with ACE2-associated (56%, 95% CI: 37%-74%, P = .610) or non-ACE2-associated viruses (63%, 95% CI: 43%-79%, P = .255). Pooled RRT rates were also not significantly different between critically ill, hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (20%, 95% CI: 16%-24%) and ACE2-associated viruses (18%, 95% CI: 8%-33%, P = .747). RRT rates for both COVID-19 and ACE2-associated viruses were significantly different ( P < .001 for both) from non-ACE2-associated viruses (49%, 95% CI: 44%-54%). After adjusting for shock or vasopressor use, AKI and RRT rates were not significantly different between groups. Limitations: Limitations of this study include the heterogeneity of definitions of AKI that were used across different virus studies. We could not match severity of infection or do propensity matching across studies. Most of the included studies were conducted in retrospective fashion. Last, we did not include non-English publications. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that viral ACE2 association does not significantly alter the rates of AKI and RRT among critically ill patients admitted to the ICU. However, the rate of RRT is lower in patients with COVID-19 or ACE2-associated viruses when compared with patients infected with non-ACE2-binding viruses, which might partly be due to the lower frequencies of shock and use of vasopressors in these two virus groups. Prospective studies are necessary to demonstrate whether modulation of the ACE2 axis with Renin-Angiotensin System inhibitors impacts the rates of AKI and whether they are beneficial or harmful in COVID-19 patients.


2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. e117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank van Someren Gréve ◽  
Marcus J. Schultz ◽  
Menno D. de Jong ◽  
Nicole P. Juffermans

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document