“Ouch! it Hurts”: An Approach About the Factors Contributing to the Experience of Pain During Receptive Anal Intercourse

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. e277-e278
Author(s):  
Mahamoud Baydoun ◽  
Carla Maria de Abreu Pereira ◽  
Carmita Helena Najjar Abdo ◽  
Giancarlo Spizzirri
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin C. Wilson ◽  
Christopher J. Hernandez ◽  
Susan Scheer ◽  
Dillon Trujillo ◽  
Sean Arayasirikul ◽  
...  

AbstractTransgender women face a serious risk of HIV infection. Despite this, there is limited knowledge and use of Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). We measured the continuity of prevention across services in the PrEP cascade and correlates of PrEP use among trans women in San Francisco enrolled in the 2019/20 National HIV Behavioral Surveillance Study. Knowledge and use of PrEP among trans women in San Francisco increased in recent years; almost all (94.0%) had heard about PrEP, 64.7% had discussed PrEP with a healthcare provider, and 44.8% had taken PrEP in the past 12 months. PrEP use was associated with participation in a PrEP demonstration project (aOR = 31.44, p = 0.001) and condomless receptive anal intercourse (aOR = 3.63, p = 0.024). Injection drug use was negatively associated (aOR = 0.19, p = 0.014). Efforts are needed to combat the gender-based stigma and discrimination faced by trans women, which can result in avoidance and mistrust of the medical system.


2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
D J Wiley ◽  
Diane M Harper ◽  
David Elashoff ◽  
Michael J Silverberg ◽  
Christine Kaestle ◽  
...  

Few analytic opportunities have allowed us to evaluate the role that specific sexual acts and male latex condoms play in the acquisition of external anal warts (EAW) using longitudinal data. The acquisition of EAWs occurs from epithelial contact with other HPV-infected surfaces, and hence is dependent upon sexual behaviour. Our objectives were to classify the relative importance of condom use, receptive anal intercourse (RAI) and prior history of EGWs on acquisition of EAWs. The observational Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study followed 2925 men over nine semiannual study visits for behavioural and physical examinations with laboratory testing. The main outcome measure was the occurrence of examiner-diagnosed EAWs in a homosexual population. EAWs were diagnosed among 10% of men studied across 22,157 visits reviewed for this study. Men with history of EGWs were more likely than those previously unaffected to have developed EAWs (cOR = 2.4 (2.0, 2.9)), as were men who reported multiple anoreceptive intercourse partners (e.g., compared with men who reported no RAI partners, men with 1, 2–5, ≥6 RAI partners had crude risk ratios 1.0 (0.8, 1.3), 1.6 (1.2, 2.1), 3.9 (2.7, 5.8), respectively). These relations persisted after other demographic and sexual risk factors were controlled for in the analyses. Consistent condom usage showed no protective effect for EAWs in our crude or adjusted analyses. Patient education messages should be tailored to reflect our uncertainty about the protective nature of condoms for the development of anal warts, but to continue to assert the protective effects of a limited lifetime number of sexual partners and the heightened risk for wart recurrence once infected.


2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 318-322
Author(s):  
Vincent J Cornelisse ◽  
Eric P F Chow ◽  
Rosie L Latimer ◽  
Janet Towns ◽  
Marcus Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Syphilis control among men who have sex with men (MSM) would be improved if we could increase the proportion of cases who present for treatment at the primary stage rather than at a later stage, as this would reduce their duration of infectivity. We hypothesized that MSM who practiced receptive anal intercourse were more likely to present with secondary syphilis, compared to MSM who did not practice receptive anal intercourse. Methods In this retrospective analysis of MSM diagnosed with primary or secondary syphilis at Melbourne Sexual Health Centre between 2008 and 2017, we analyzed associations between the stage of syphilis (primary vs secondary) and behavioral data collected by computer-assisted self-interviews. Results There were 559 MSM diagnosed with primary (n = 338) or secondary (n = 221) syphilis. Of these, 134 (24%) men reported not practicing receptive anal sex. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, MSM were more likely to present with secondary rather than primary syphilis if they reported practicing receptive anal intercourse (adjusted odds ratio 3.90; P < .001) after adjusting for age, human immunodeficiency virus status, and condom use. MSM with primary syphilis who did not practice receptive anal intercourse almost always (92%) had their primary syphilis lesion on their penis. Conclusions The finding that MSM who practiced receptive anal intercourse more commonly presented with secondary syphilis—and hence, had undetected syphilis during the primary stage—implies that anorectal syphilis chancres are less noticeable than penile chancres. These men may need additional strategies to improve early detection of anorectal chancres, to reduce their duration of infectivity and, hence, reduce onward transmission. Men who practiced receptive anal intercourse (AI) were more likely to present with secondary syphilis, compared to men who exclusively practiced insertive AI. Hence, men who practice receptive AI may need additional strategies to detect anal chancres, to reduce transmission.


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 667-681
Author(s):  
James Stannah ◽  
Romain Silhol ◽  
Jocelyn Elmes ◽  
Branwen Owen ◽  
Barbara L. Shacklett ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 938-950 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavo Machado Rocha ◽  
◽  
Mark Drew Crosland Guimarães ◽  
Ana Maria de Brito ◽  
Ines Dourado ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. e0194306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laio Magno ◽  
Inês Dourado ◽  
Luís Augusto V. da Silva ◽  
Sandra Brignol ◽  
Leila Amorim ◽  
...  

Sexual Health ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 571
Author(s):  
Eugenio Nelson Cavallari ◽  
Gabriella d'Ettorre ◽  
Giancarlo Ceccarelli ◽  
Sara Serafini ◽  
Alessandra Pierangeli ◽  
...  

Background The risk of progression to cancer from HPV infection is increased in HIV-positive subjects. Anal HPV infection is a concern among men who have sex with men (MSM), especially in the setting of HIV infection. Methods: Cross-sectional study including 62 HIV-positive injection drug users (IDUs) without history of receptive anal intercourse and 110 HIV-positive MSM. All patients were receiving HAART with HIV-RNA <37 copies/mL. Patients answered a self-administered questionnaire investigating their sexual habits. Participants underwent anal brushing collecting samples for cytology examination (Bethesda 2001 criteria for cervical cytology) and high resolution anoscopy collecting samples for histological classification. HPV-DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) identification was performed. Results: Of the IDUs, 62.5% showed CD4 nadir <200 cell/mmc compared with 12% of MSM (P < 0.05), the actual CD4+ T-cells count did not show a statistical difference. HPV-DNA PCR tested positive in 52% of IDUs and 69% of MSM (P < 0.05). Presence of high-risk genotypes did not show significant difference between the groups (38% of IDUs and 31% of MSM). LSIL prevalence was higher among MSM than IDUs (38% v. 23%), HSIL was higher among IDUs than MSM (26% v. 21%). The prevalence of anal cancer was similar in the two populations (3% in each group). All patients, except for men presenting with anal cancer, were completely asymptomatic. Conclusions: Anal HPV infection and anal SIL may be acquired in the absence of anal intercourse in HIV-infected men. The prevalence of HSIL is high among HIV-positive IDUs. All HIV-infected men, regardless of history of anal intercourse, should be considered for anal cytology screening.


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 996-1007 ◽  
Author(s):  
C F Kelley ◽  
C S Kraft ◽  
T JB de Man ◽  
C Duphare ◽  
H-W Lee ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 1288-1294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Carballo-Diéguez ◽  
Cody Lentz ◽  
Rebecca Giguere ◽  
Edward J. Fuchs ◽  
Craig W. Hendrix

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document