scholarly journals Distribution of branch lengths and phylogenetic diversity under homogeneous speciation models

2012 ◽  
Vol 297 ◽  
pp. 33-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanja Stadler ◽  
Mike Steel
2015 ◽  
Vol 370 (1662) ◽  
pp. 20140006 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Jonathan Davies

Biodiversity provides many valuable services to humanity; however, rapid expansion of the human population has placed increasing pressure on natural systems, and it has been suggested that we may be entering a sixth mass extinction. There is an urgent need, therefore, to prioritize conservation efforts if we are to maintain the provisioning of such service in the future. Phylogenetic diversity (PD), the summed branch lengths that connect species on the tree-of-life, might provide a valuable metric for conservation prioritization because it has been argued to capture feature diversity. Frequently, PD is estimated in millions of years, and therefore implicitly assumes an evolutionary model in which features diverge gradually over time. Here, I explore the expected loss of feature diversity when this assumption is violated. If evolution tends to slow down over time, as might be the case following adaptive radiations, losses of feature diversity might be relatively small. However, if evolution occurs in rapid bursts, following a punctuated model, impacts of extinctions might be much greater. PD captures many important properties, but if we use it as a proxy for feature diversity, we first need to ensure that we have the correct evolutionary model.


2016 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 619-628 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Gastauer ◽  
J. A. A. Meira-Neto

Abstract Dated or calibrated phylogenetic trees, in which branch lengths correspond to evolutionary divergence times between nodes, are important requirements for computing measures of phylogenetic diversity or phylogenetic community structure. The increasing knowledge about the diversification and evolutionary divergence times of vascular plants requires a revision of the age estimates used for the calibration of phylogenetic trees by the bladj algorithm of the Phylocom 4.2 package. Comparing the recently released megatree R20120829.new with two calibrated vascular plant phylogenies provided in the literature, we found 242 corresponding nodes. We modified the megatree (R20120829mod.new), inserting names for all corresponding nodes. Furthermore, we provide files containing age estimates from both sources for the updated calibration of R20120829mod.new. Applying these files consistently in analyses of phylogenetic community structure or diversity serves to avoid erroneous measures and ecological misinterpretation.


1994 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel P. Faith

Limited resources for conservation highlight the need for placing priorities on species or other taxa. While priorities or "weightings" based on taxonomic information are now well-established in principle, there is no agreement on a preferred approach. One set of methods attempts to use phylogenetic branch length or divergence information, when available. The "phylogenetic diversity" measure of Faith (1992) uses sums of branch lengths from phylogenetic estimates in order to predict underlying patterns of feature diversity among taxa. An alternative approach suggested by Altschul and Lipman also uses divergence information and would appear to yield results similar to phylogenetic diversity. However, it is demonstrated here that their method in fact can give results opposite to those required if feature diversity is to be maximized. A simple conservation management example, based on mtDNA variation at the population level, illustrates the relative advantage of using phylogenetic diversity to set conservation priorities.


2011 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arne Mooers ◽  
Olivier Gascuel ◽  
Tanja Stadler ◽  
Heyang Li ◽  
Mike Steel

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Wicke ◽  
Arne Mooers ◽  
Mike Steel

AbstractThe extent to which phylogenetic diversity (PD) captures feature diversity (FD) is a topical and controversial question in biodiversity conservation. In this short paper, we formalise this question and establish a precise mathematical condition for FD (based on discrete characters) to coincide with PD. In this way, we make explicit the two main reasons why the two diversity measures might disagree for given data; namely, the presence of certain patterns of feature evolution and loss, and using temporal branch lengths for PD in settings that may not be appropriate (e.g. due to rapid evolution of certain features over short periods of time). Our paper also explores the relationship between the ‘Fair Proportion’ index of PD and a simple index of FD (both of which correspond to Shapley values in cooperative game theory). In a second mathematical result, we show that the two indices can take identical values for any phylogenetic tree, provided the branch lengths in the tree are chosen appropriately.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Wicke ◽  
Arne Mooers ◽  
Mike Steel

Abstract The extent to which phylogenetic diversity (PD) captures feature diversity (FD) is a topical and controversial question in biodiversity conservation. In this short paper, we formalize this question and establish a precise mathematical condition for FD (based on discrete characters) to coincide with PD. In this way, we make explicit the two main reasons why the two diversity measures might disagree for given data; namely, the presence of certain patterns of feature evolution and loss, and using temporal branch lengths for PD in settings that may not be appropriate (e.g., due to rapid evolution of certain features over short periods of time). Our article also explores the relationship between the “Fair Proportion” index of PD and a simple index of FD (both of which correspond to Shapley values in cooperative game theory). In a second mathematical result, we show that the two indices can take identical values for any phylogenetic tree, provided the branch lengths in the tree are chosen appropriately. [Evolutionary distinctiveness; feature diversity; phylogenetic diversity; shapley value.]


2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 380-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxia ZHANG ◽  
Xiaotong MA ◽  
Weidong CAO ◽  
Shanjun WEI ◽  
Jianhui CAI ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Max Christie ◽  
◽  
Curtis R. Congreve ◽  
Mark E. Patzkowsky

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document