scholarly journals PCN101 - COSTS AND HEALTHCARE RESOURCE USE ASSOCIATED WITH MAINTENANCE THERAPY IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S31
Author(s):  
D. Cherepanov ◽  
S. Kayaniyil ◽  
H. Huang ◽  
D. Romanus ◽  
R. Labotka ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Rutherford ◽  
Dieter Götte

Abstract Background and Aims ANCA associated vasculitis (AAV) treatment aims to quickly control vasculitis activity and then prevent relapse during the maintenance phase of this long term condition. Patients are at risk from disease and treatment related complications with high dose and/or long term glucocorticoid use being a major concern. This retrospective study examined adverse events, infections and healthcare resource use in patients managed in routine practice. Method 1478 AAV patients (France, Germany, Italy, Spain and UK) managed by 493 physicians (61% Nephrologists) who completed induction therapy for new or relapsing organ or life threatening AAV and initiated maintenance therapy between 2014-16 were studied. Data were collected at the time maintenance was determined to begin by the physician and then at 6, 12, 18 and 36 months. 51% had microscopic polyangiitis, mean age 54.2 years with 56% male. BVAS was not used routinely but 56% had moderate systemic disease and 44% severe systemic disease at the time of start of induction remission treatment. Results 78% patients had comorbidity (48% hypertension, 20% dylipidaemia, 17% type 2 diabetes mellitus, 14% depression, 13% COPD/asthma and 9% had BMI > 35) at induction treatment start. Maintenance was defined by physicians as starting approximately 6 months into treatment. AEs potentially linked to GCs were common (values are %, bp = hypertension, DM = diabetes mellitus) during the maintenance phase and many patients remained on long term glucocortioids. Infections were also common, in particular upper (URTI) and lower respiratory tract (LRTI) infection and urinary tract infections (UTI). Hospitilisations still occurred during maintenance period, in particular these are due to infections. Maintenance treatment varied and was changed over follow up (in 13-19% patients at each time point) and in a proportion of patients the change in treatment was precipitated by an adverse event or infection (6 months 21%, 12 months 22%, 18 months 23%, 38 months 26%). Conclusion Comorbidity is common in AAV patients and needs to be considered carefully when making treatment decisions. Patients receiving maintenance therapy frequently experience potentially GC related AEs and infections are also common. Healthcare resource use continues in the maintenance phase and this is on the background of comorbidity, less then complete remission rates and high use of long term steroids. New approaches are required to reduce clinical and healthcare system burdens during the maintenance treatment phase of AAV.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. e39-55
Author(s):  
Justin Hall ◽  
Reza Mirza ◽  
James Quinlan ◽  
Evan Chong ◽  
Karen Born ◽  
...  

Background: Resident doctors are integral to healthcare delivery in Canada. Engaging residents in resource stewardship is important for professional development, but also as they are drivers of healthcare resource use. To date, no national resident-specific resource stewardship guideline has been developed. Resident Doctors of Canada (RDoC) in collaboration with Choosing Wisely Canada (CWC) sought to develop an evidence-informed, consensus-based list of five recommendations to promote resource stewardship.                  Methods: RDoC convened a taskforce with diverse geographic and specialty representation to develop candidate recommendations targeting resident resource stewardship behaviours using a consensus-based process, supported by a literature review. Residents across the country provided feedback on the candidate recommendations via an online questionnaire. The taskforce used this feedback to finalize the list.Results: The taskforce prepared 28 candidate recommendations for consideration. A detailed literature review and consensus process narrowed this list to 12 candidate recommendations for consultation. A total of 754 residents (754/10,068 residents = 7.5%) representing all provinces and levels of residency training reviewed and ranked the candidate recommendations. The highest-ranked recommendations comprised the final list.Conclusion: Resident doctors are willing and able to demonstrate leadership in advancing resource stewardship by the development of a national resident-specific list of Choosing Wisely Canada recommendations.


2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 477-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Nash Smyth ◽  
Ilaria Conti ◽  
James E. Wooldridge ◽  
Lee Bowman ◽  
Li Li ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. A751
Author(s):  
HM Blommestein ◽  
SG Verelst ◽  
A Zagorska ◽  
J Stevanovic ◽  
A Engstrom ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. e049623
Author(s):  
Leona K Shum ◽  
Herbert Chan ◽  
Shannon Erdelyi ◽  
Lulu X Pei ◽  
Jeffrey R Brubacher

IntroductionRoad trauma (RT) is a major public health problem affecting physical and mental health, and may result in prolonged absenteeism from work or study. It is important for healthcare providers to know which RT survivors are at risk of a poor outcome, and policy-makers should know the associated costs. Unfortunately, outcome after RT is poorly understood, especially for RT survivors who are treated and released from an emergency department (ED) without the need for hospital admission. Currently, there is almost no research on risk factors for a poor outcome among RT survivors. This study will use current Canadian data to address these knowledge gaps.Methods and analysisWe will follow an inception cohort of 1500 RT survivors (16 years and older) who visited a participating ED within 24 hours of the accident. Baseline interviews determine pre-existing health and functional status, and other potential risk factors for a poor outcome. Follow-up interviews at 2, 4, 6, and 12 months (key stages of recovery) use standardised health-related quality of life tools to determine physical and mental health outcome, functional recovery, and healthcare resource use and lost productivity costs.Ethics and disseminationThe Road Trauma Outcome Study is approved by our institutional Research Ethics Board. This study aims to provide healthcare providers with knowledge on how quickly RT survivors recover from their injuries and who may be more likely to have a poor outcome. We anticipate that this information will be used to improve management of all road users following RT. Healthcare resource use and lost productivity costs will be collected to provide a better cost estimate of the effects of RT. This information can be used by policy-makers to make informed decisions on RT prevention programmes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document