scholarly journals Quantification and characterization of effluents from the seafood processing industry aiming at water reuse: A pilot study

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 138-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas T. Guimarães ◽  
André L.M. Souza ◽  
Ana Iraidy S. Brígida ◽  
Angela A.L. Furtado ◽  
Patrícia C.M. S. Chicrala ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily J Reppert ◽  
Michael D Kleinhenz ◽  
Abbie Viscardi ◽  
Shawnee R Montgomery ◽  
Alison R Crane ◽  
...  

Abstract Lameness is a serious health concern for livestock species. Understanding individual animal response to pain and characterization of lameness are critical when developing appropriate treatments. The objectives of this pilot study was to evaluate two different lameness models and measures for determining response to induced lameness in meat goats. Lameness was induced by intraarticular injection into the left hind lateral claw distal interphalangeal joint with either amphotericin B (Amp-B) or kaolin-carrageenan (K-C). Response to lameness was characterized by behavior scoring, visual lameness scoring (VLS), infrared thermography (IRT) of the affected digit, pressure mat gait analysis (PMT), and plasma cortisol (CORT) analysis. Lame goats had higher VLS compared to controls (P = 0.003). Maximum temperatures measured in hooves from lame vs control goats were significantly higher (P = 0.003). Pressure mat analysis demonstrated, when compared to controls, lame goats had decreased force (P = 0.013), impulse (P = 0.007), contact pressure (P = 0.007), and contact area of the left hind limb (P = 0.009). Mean CORT levels 4 and 6 h after lameness induction were higher in lame goats (P = 0.005, P = 0.01). The two lameness methods reliably induced lameness of varying severity in healthy meat goats.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laszlo Szpisjak ◽  
Gabor Szaraz ◽  
Andras Salamon ◽  
Viola L. Nemeth ◽  
Noemi Szepfalusi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.


2009 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 371-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. Cruz-Aguilar ◽  
I. Ramírez-Salado ◽  
R.V. Arenas-Rosas ◽  
A.M. Santillán-Doherty ◽  
J.I. Muñoz-Delgado

Author(s):  
Mehmet Emrah Yaman ◽  
Izzet Avci ◽  
Nihal Efe Atila ◽  
Alptug Atila ◽  
Haci Mehmet Kayili ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
David Sproule ◽  
Rosemarie Figueroa Jacinto ◽  
Steve Rundell ◽  
Jacob Williams ◽  
Sam Perlmutter ◽  
...  

Virtual reality (VR) and personal head-mounted displays (HMDs) can be a viable tool for the presentation of scientifically accurate and valid demonstrative data in the courtroom. However, the capabilities and limitations of the technology need to be fully characterized. The current pilot study evaluated visual acuity and contrast sensitivity using two commercially available HMDs (Oculus Rift and HTC Vive Pro). Preliminary findings indicated that visual acuity and contrast sensitivity experienced in VR may be less than what is experienced in real-world scenarios. The current pilot study provides a quantitative approach for characterizing the limitations of VR with respect to visual acuity and contrast sensitivity, and provides recommendations for the appropriate use of this technology when performing forensic investigations and developing visualization tools.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document